Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Tony Shipley’

Call to action, Traffic scamera vote in public safety committee Tues 2-9

February 7th, 2010 No comments

The Show” blog gives below some important information on the upcoming vote on revenue cameras used by cities in Tennessee.

The vote is set to take place after the Transportation committee (they start at 3:30pm Nashville time).

HB 3024

Here are the subcommittee members.

Committee Officers

* Vince Dean, Chair
Phone (615) 741-1934
Fax (615) 253-0271
rep.vince.dean@capitol.tn.gov

* Tony Shipley, Vice-Chair
Phone: (615) 741-2886
rep.tony.shipley@capitol.tn.gov
Facebook page

Members

Ty Cobb

Phone: (615) 741-3005
rep.ty.cobb@capitol.tn.gov
Facebook page

* Chad Faulkner

Phone: (615) 741-3335
rep.chad.faulkner@capitol.tn.gov
Facebook page

* Pat Marsh

Phone (615) 741-6824
Fax (615) 253-0344
rep.pat.marsh@capitol.tn.go

* Ben West

Phone (615) 741-6959
Fax (615) 253-0331
rep.ben.west@capitol.tn.gov


Here is the bill

*HB 3024 by *Harmon, McCord, Tidwell, West. (SB 2918 by *Burchett.)

Traffic Safety – As introduced, directs the comptroller to study traffic surveillance cameras, places a two-year moratorium on new cameras, and revises fines from traffic violations captured by such cameras. – Amends TCA Title 55, Chapter 8, Part 1.

Fiscal Summary

Not Available

Bill Summary

Present law requires that any state agency or political subdivision of the state that installs, owns, operates or maintains a traffic-control signal light located in an intersection that employs a surveillance camera for the enforcement or monitoring of traffic violations must ensure that:

(1) The surveillance camera does not identify as a violation of the “stop on red” requirement of the rules of the road any vehicle that legally entered the intersection during the green or yellow intervals; and
(2) Appropriate signage is located not less than 500 feet but not more than 1,000 feet in advance of the intersection informing drivers as to the presence of surveillance cameras at the approaching intersection.

A traffic citation that is based solely upon evidence obtained from a surveillance camera that has been installed to enforce or monitor traffic violations is considered a nonmoving traffic violation. If the state agency or political division of the state violates (1), as described above, then any traffic citation based solely on evidence generated by the surveillance camera is deemed to be invalid.

Present law prohibits the placement of any surveillance cameras on federal interstate highways, except for Smart Way cameras, other intelligent transportation system cameras or, when workers are present, surveillance cameras used to enforce or monitor traffic violations within work zones designated by the department of transportation; provided, that the cameras must be operated only by a state entity.

This bill requires the comptroller to conduct a comprehensive study of the use of traffic surveillance cameras by government agencies in Tennessee and to provide a copy of such study to the transportation committee of each chamber by January 15, 2011.

Beginning January 1, 2011, this bill prohibits any local government from placing or operating a surveillance camera used to enforce traffic safety on any highway receiving state financial aid unless:

(1) The local governing body exhausts all reasonable engineering solutions pursuant to department of transportation standards to enhance traffic safety; and
(2) Any contract for the operation of such surveillance camera by a private vendor provides only for payment for services rendered, and no payment is based on a percentage of traffic citations generated by such surveillance camera.

This bill prohibits any local or county government from entering or renewing any contract with a private vendor for the operation of any surveillance camera used to enforce traffic safety until July 1, 2012, except that such prohibition will not apply to the portion of the roadway between blocks 2900 through 3200 of Hixson Pike in Hamilton County. Any contract entered into or renewed after July 1, 2012, must comply with the following:

(1) Rules promulgated by the department of transportation that prescribe traffic and engineering studies be conducted before the installation of a traffic violation surveillance camera;
(2) Rules promulgated by the department of safety that prescribe traffic safety considerations be addressed before the installation of a traffic violation surveillance camera; and
(3) Guidelines established by the comptroller for local government contracts with private vendors for installation and use of traffic surveillance traffic cameras.

This bill requires that the departments of transportation and safety consult with the Tennessee Association of Chiefs of Police and the Tennessee Sheriffs’ Association before filing rules pursuant to this bill with the secretary of state. This bill also requires that any local governmental entity seeking to install or operate traffic surveillance traffic cameras must, by majority vote, request that the comptroller verify that such local governmental entity has met all the requirements of the rules promulgated by the departments prior to the installation or operation of traffic surveillance cameras. A local governmental entity must vote to approve the installation or operation of traffic surveillance cameras after receipt of notice by the comptroller of compliance with the rules. Any rules promulgated pursuant to this bill must be presented to the transportation committees of each chamber for review and comment before being considered by the government operations committees of each chamber.

This bill requires that each local governing body that contracts for placement or operation a traffic surveillance camera on any highway receiving state financial aid on or after July 1, 2012, must submit the contract to the comptroller. This bill authorizes the comptroller to conduct compliance audits of any local governing body that has placed or is operating a traffic surveillance camera.

This bill sets the penalty for a person charged by a traffic citation that is based solely upon evidence obtained from a surveillance camera as follows:

(1) For a first offense by a fine of $10.00 only;
(2) For a second offense by a fine of $25.00 only; and
(3) For a third or subsequent offense by a fine of $50.00 only.

A person will not be considered a multiple offender under this bill if three years have passed since the prior violation. This bill also limits the court costs in any such case to $10.00 and prohibits the assessment of litigation taxes against any person who pays the ticket on time.

This bill adds to present law by requiring that the law enforcement employee who reviews video evidence from a traffic light signal monitoring system and makes a determination as to whether a violation has occurred must be certified by the peace officer standards and training commission.

Shocking News About Sullivan County Aging Population

October 8th, 2009 1 comment

I have done many posts concerning the median age and population in Sullivan County, Tennessee and  Sullivan County has one of the oldest populations in the state (click here to view the data).

The data below is from the state and I hope will help illustrate exactly what will happen if Sullivan County continues as it has in the past.

Below in the graph is a breakdown on the population for the different age groups in Sullivan County for the census year 2000 and projections for year 2025.  Sullivan County population in year 2000 was 153,048 and is projected to be 161,262 in year 2025.

Note that in the graph below that the 2025 population for all age groups are less for age groups that are under the 55 to 59 age group.  The year 2025 graph shows that the population numbers shows the population growing for for ages group 55 and up.  The largest single age group with the largest population is the age group 75 and up and the larger part of them are females.

Sulivan-County-2000-to-2025

Is Sullivan County equipped to handle the aging population?  There should great demand for those businesses offering services to the elderly.  But, if you are a pediatric physician, you might want to start your practice elsewhere because of the low birth rate in Sullivan County.

The table below gives the actual population numbers for the different age groups.  I have added the year 2010 which is not plotted in the above graph so you can see what is projected for 2010.  The data from the state is given as number of males and females for each age group and I have added the male and female population numbers together in the table below and the graph.

Population Projections for Sullivan County, TN



Year
Age Group 2000 2010 2025
0 to 4 8,542 8,593 7,897
5 to 9 9,411 9,012 8,498
10 to 14 9,709 8,697 8,538
15 to 19 9,204 8,330 7,514
20 to 24 7,778 8,692 7,638
25 to 29 9,625 9,751 8,180
30 to 34 10,420 8,669 9,154
35 to 39 11,534 10,078 9,887
40 to 44 11,873 10,864 10,597
45 to 49 11,543 11,697 9,357
50 to 54 11,241 11,644 10,368
55 to 59 9,776 11,501 11,410
60 to 64 8,066 10,981 11,817
65 to 69 6,919 9,112 11,197
70 to 74 6,358 6,981 9,705
75 and up 11,049 13,960 19,506
Total 153,048 158,560 161,262

You can view the data for other Tennessee Counties which includes projections for every five years up to year 2025.  Click on the link below to go to the Tennessee webpage

Demographic Information on Age-Gender Composition

In addition to the population projections for each Tennessee city and county contained in the report above, you may access more detailed cohort-component data for a city or county below. (Please note that updated demographic projections will be forthcoming.)

Please either click a county on the Tennessee state map or click a county name in the alphabetical list below the map to access the cohort-component data. Note the Word of Caution following table listed below.

Click here to view state data for Tennessee Counties


I am one of the older population and am concerned about the future of Sullivan County.   No, you can’t move us out of the county, but you should be concerned about the future of the county when we have left this world.  There must be something in place to keep young people in Sullivan County.  A good start would be get companies that have good paying jobs to locate here.   If you too are concerned, talk to your elected officials.  You can email them at the following links.

email Kingsport BMA

email Candidates for Tennessee Governor

email Tennessee Legislators for area

email Sullivan County Commissioners

See list for

or

Comments are welcome.

Update: Against Building Taxpayer Funded Denominational Medical School in East TN

July 16th, 2009 6 comments

King College, a denominational college located in Bristol, Tennessee, has been in discussions with Kingsport, Bristol, and Sullivan County officials to build a medical school in Kingsport and Bristol.

The cost for the medical school would be about $150 million.  King is looking for $50 million to come from the cities of Kingsport ($40 million) and Bristol ($10 million), $50 million from the State of Tennessee, and the remaining $50 million from private donations.

At the July 7, 2009, Kingsport, Tennessee Board of Mayor and Alderman, a resolution was passed on first reading to endorse the King College Medical School Initiative, and pledged its commitment to work with Bristol, Sullivan County, and King College to advance the project.

While it does sound like a good project for the area, there will be a major impact on the taxpayers if this is funded via a property tax increase.

Mayor Dennis Phillips has stated that if Kingsport were to fund $40 million for the project, property taxes would have to be raised 25 cents.

Below are tax rates that have been extracted from the Tennessee Property Tax Rates that show the top 20 cities that have the highest tax rates in Tennessee from 406 different tax rates for the different cities and counties.

I have added 25 cents to the tax rates for the two Kingsport line items (Kingsport-Sullivan and Kingsport-Hawkins) in the table below.  Kingsport, with the 25 cents added, would have a rank of 10 and 12 as having the most expensive tax rates in the state.  Bristol has a rank of 14 and I have no knowledge if they would increase property taxes.

Top 20 Cities with the most expensive property tax rates
R
a
n
k
County City Total County and City Tax Property Tax for $150k Home Household Median Income % Taxes from Household Income Median Home Value
1 SHELBY MEMPHIS $7.29 $2,734 $32,285 8.47% $130,695
2 SHELBY GERMANTOWN $5.63 $2,111 $113,733 1.86% $278,800
3 SHELBY BARTLETT $5.63 $2,111 $74,091 2.85% $164,600
4 KNOX KNOXVILLE $5.50 $2,063 $32,538 6.34% $102,300
5 ANDERSON OAK RIDGE $5.45 $2,044 $45,474 4.49% $120,100
6 SHELBY COLLIERVILLE $5.37 $2,014 $99,239 2.03% $255,400
7 HAMILTON CHATTANOOGA $5.36 $2,009 $35,913 5.59% $121,100
8 SHELBY MILLINGTON $5.32 $1,995 $43,753 4.56% $124,144
9 MADISON HUMBOLDT $5.30 $1,988 $50,007 3.98% $181,800
10 HAWKINS KINGSPORT $5.11* $1,916 $34,391 5.57% $99,900
11 SHELBY ARLINGTON $5.09 $1,909 $59,131 3.23% $233,597
12 SULLIVAN KINGSPORT $5.08* $1,905 $34,391 5.54% $99,900
13 ROANE OAK RIDGE $5.04 $1,890 $45,474 4.16% $120,100
14 SULLIVAN BRISTOL $5.03 $1,886 $36,454 5.17% $94,000
15 MORGAN OAKDALE $4.98 $1,868 $32,174 5.81% $47,502
16 COFFEE MANCHESTER $4.96 $1,860 $36,674 5.07% $112,275
17 HAMILTON LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN $4.95 $1,858 $117,767 1.58% $515,354
18 HAMILTON RIDGESIDE $4.95 $1,858 $103,995 1.79% $293,387
19 LAUDERDALE HENNING $4.95 $1,856 $23,407 7.93% $65,212
20 HAMILTON SIGNAL MOUNTAIN $4.93 $1,848 $78,175 2.36% $283,948

* The current city and county combined tax rate for Kingsport-Sullivan County is $4.86 and Kingsport-Hawkins County is $4.86.  Twenty-five cents has been added to each of the Kingsport tax rates in the above table.


The table below again shows the top 20 cites and the effect on the taxpayers’ Household Median Income.  There appears to be a disconnect with those cities having a high tax rate, lower Household Median Income and the percentage of Household Income needed to pay property taxes.

The household median income for Kingsport is $34,391 and the Kingsport majority of Kingsport property owners would pay over 5.5 percent of household income ($150k home) for property taxes if  the 25 cents is added to the Kingsport tax rate.  The Kingsport rank is 6 and 7 and Bristol comes in at a rank of 8 in the table below for the largest percent of household income needed to pay property taxes.

A taxpayer funded medical school would reduce the already low Kingsport household income and would reduce the standard of living for the majority of Kingsport citizens so the city could reap the benefits of increased revenue to spend on other pet projects.

Top 20 Cities that take the highest percentage of income for property taxes
R
a
n
k
County City Total County and City Tax Property Tax for $150k Home Household Median Income % Taxes from Household Income Median Home Value
1 SHELBY MEMPHIS $7.29 $2,734 $32,285 8.47% $130,695
2 LAUDERDALE HENNING $4.95 $1,856 $23,407 7.93% $65,212
3 KNOX KNOXVILLE $5.50 $2,063 $32,538 6.34% $102,300
4 MORGAN OAKDALE $4.98 $1,868 $32,174 5.81% $47,502
5 HAMILTON CHATTANOOGA $5.36 $2,009 $35,913 5.59% $121,100
6 HAWKINS KINGSPORT $5.11* $1,916 $34,391 5.57% $99,900
7 SULLIVAN KINGSPORT $5.08* $1,905 $34,391 5.54% $99,900
8 SULLIVAN BRISTOL $5.03 $1,886 $36,454 5.17% $94,000
9 COFFEE MANCHESTER $4.96 $1,860 $36,674 5.07% $112,275
10 SHELBY MILLINGTON $5.32 $1,995 $43,753 4.56% $124,144
11 ANDERSON OAK RIDGE $5.45 $2,044 $45,474 4.49% $120,100
12 ROANE OAK RIDGE $5.04 $1,890 $45,474 4.16% $120,100
13 MADISON HUMBOLDT $5.30 $1,988 $50,007 3.98% $181,800
14 SHELBY ARLINGTON $5.09 $1,909 $59,131 3.23% $233,597
15 SHELBY BARTLETT $5.63 $2,111 $74,091 2.85% $164,600
16 HAMILTON SIGNAL MOUNTAIN $4.93 $1,848 $78,175 2.36% $283,948
17 SHELBY COLLIERVILLE $5.37 $2,014 $99,239 2.03% $255,400
18 SHELBY GERMANTOWN $5.63 $2,111 $113,733 1.86% $278,800
19 HAMILTON RIDGESIDE $4.95 $1,858 $103,995 1.79% $293,387
20 HAMILTON LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN $4.95 $1,858 $117,767 1.58% $515,354

* The current city and county combined tax rate for Kingsport-Sullivan County is $4.86 and Kingsport-Hawkins County is $4.86.  Twenty-five cents has been added to each of the Kingsport tax rates in the above table.


I have heard some members of the Kingsport BMA express their desire to have a college located in Kingsport.  They should keep in mind that there are very large number of cities that have been successful without having a college and who also have a better standard of living than Kingsport.

College Cities

Household Median Income

Knoxville $32,538
Bristol $36,454
Chattanooga $35,913
Johnson City $35,746
Memphis $35,181

The above cities that have a college appear not to have increased the standard of living and have a low household median income.

Below is the household income distribution for Kingsport and the household median income for Kingsport is $34,391.  In the graph below there are 2,636 people who earn less than $10,000  classifying them as living in poverty.

I challenge the elected officials to venture outside of their social and political groups and try to understand the plight of the majority of wage earners in the Kingsport area.  The medical school would bring jobs, but some of these jobs will be imported jobs and the common folks would not have the background or training for these jobs.  Ask what you can do to raise the standard of living (higher income) for Kingsport citizens without imposing a property tax burden.

I feel that the taxpayers should not be taking the risk of funding a medical school when there already is a state funded one in Johnson City.  The need for doctors in this area is questionable since the population is declining in Sullivan County.  If they area has trouble attracting doctors or keeping doctors, then take a hard look at the reason.

Quality of Life issues are important, but a good Standard of Living for local folks just might make the area prosper by increased spending by the majority of citizens.

The bottom line is that the area needs good paying jobs without the additional burden on the taxpayers.

I need to point out that no funding has been voted on so far, but projects such as this grows legs very fast and then its then to late to react.  The intent of this post is to make you aware of the issues so you can make your views know.  Update:  Many elected officials have expressed their support of this project including Lt. Governor Ron Ramsey who may make it a part of his campaign for governor.  Again, I must point out that I am not against the project but am very concerned about it being funded by taxpayers.

Please contact your elected officials and tell them NO to a taxpayer funded denominational medical school.  Click on the email links below and add your comments in your own email program.

email Kingsport BMA
Mayor Dennis Phillips
Vice Mayor Ben Mallicote
Alderman Larry Munsey
Alderman Jantry Shupe
Alderwoman Valerie Joh
Alderman Ken Marsh, Jr.
Alderman Tom Parham
email Tennessee Legislators for area
Lt. Governor Ron Ramsey
Senator Mike Faulk
Rep. Jason E. Mumpower
Rep. Tony Shipley
Rep. Jon Lundberg
Rep. Dale Ford
email Sullivan County Commissioners
See list for
Commissioners individual emails
or
email Mayor and all Sullivan County Commissioners
email this post to a friend
email Candidates for Tennessee Governor
Mike McWherter
Roy Herron
Ward Cammack
Zack Wamp
Bill Haslam
Ron Ramsey
Kim McMillan
Jim Kyle

Do you know who your elected officials are?

February 11th, 2009 2 comments

Do you know who your elected officials are?  Do you want to know what they are doing and how they voted, etc?

I have made available on the Menu Bar above the posts a tab labeled “Elected Officials”.   Put your mouse over the tab and you will see a drop down sub-menu and you can select the following:

  • BMA Members
  • Sullivan County
  • TN Legislators
  • U.S. Congress

Below is an example of a page for TN Legislators.   Click on the “More Info.” button to see some of the things they have been doing.


Below are the Tennessee Legislators that have districts in the Kingsport, TN area.  If you are from another area in Tennessee, go to Tennessee General Assembly to find your elected official.

Click on “More Info.” button for information on bills sponsored, etc.  This is a way of tracking what your elected officials are actually doing for you.

Lt. Governor Ron Ramsey

R-Blountville
District 2 — Johnson and Sullivan Counties — Map
District Address

3311 Highway 126
Blountville, TN 37617
Phone (423) 323-8700

Nashville Address

1 Legislative Plaza
Nashville, TN 37243-0219
Phone (615) 741-4524
Fax (615) 253-0197
lt.gov.ron.ramsey@capitol.tn.gov <-email

Senator Mike Faulk
R-Kingsport
District 4 — Claiborne, Grainger, Hancock, Hawkins, Jefferson, and Union Counties — Map
District Address

1001 Darby Court
Kingsport, TN 37660
Phone: (423) 357-8088

Nashville Address

11A Legislative Plaza
Nashville, TN 37243
Phone (615) 741-2061
sen.mike.faulk@capitol.tn.gov <-email

Rep. Jason E. Mumpower

R-Bristol
District 3 — Johnson and part of Sullivan Counties — Map
District Address

P.O. Box 2221 Bristol, TN 37621
Phone (423) 989-3234

Nashville Address

103 War Memorial Building
Nashville, TN 37243-0103
Phone (615) 741-2050
Fax (615) 253-0298
rep.jason.mumpower@capitol.tn.gov <-email

Rep. Tony Shipley
R-Kingsport
District 2 — Part of Sullivan County — Map
District Address

P.O. Box 6173
Kingsport 37663

Nashville Address

207 War Memorial Bldg.
Nashville TN 37243
Phone: (615) 741-2886
rep.tony.shipley@capitol.tn.gov <-email

Rep. Jon Lundberg
R-Bristol
District 1 — Part of Sullivan County — Map
District Address

212 Skyline Drive
Bristol, TN 37620

Nashville Address

205 War Memorial Building
Nashville, TN 37243-0104
Phone (615) 741-7623
Fax (615) 253-0272
rep.jon.lundberg@capitol.tn.gov <-email

Rep. Dale Ford
R-Jonesborough
District 6 — Part of Washington and Hawkins County — Map
District Address

678 Brethern Church Rd.
Jonesborough, TN 37659

Nashville Address

202A War Memorial Building
Nashville, TN 37243-0106
Phone (615) 741-1717
Fax (615) 253-0301
rep.dale.ford@capitol.tn.gov

Sullivan County, Tennessee November 4, 2008 Election Results

November 5th, 2008 1 comment

The election results for Sullivan County, Tennessee are listed below.  To view the detail results, go to Sullivan County election 

Lamar Alexander – UNITED STATES SENATE
Phil Roe – UNITED STATES HOUSE of REPRESENTATIVES 1st Congressional District
Ron Ramsey – TENNESSEE SENATE 2nd Senatorial District
Jon Lundberg – TENNESSEE HOUSE of REPRESENTATIVES 1st Representative District
Tony Shipley – TENNESSEE HOUSE of REPRESENTATIVES 2nd Representative District
Jason Mumpower – TENNESSEE HOUSE of REPRESENTATIVES 3rd Representative District

John McCain visits Tri-Cities, Tennessee

November 3rd, 2008 No comments

VIEW FULL SPEECH VIDEO: McCain Campaigns At TCRA

  Senator John McCain visited the Tri-Cities today to present his message to Southwest Virginia and East Tennessee citizens.  There was a large crowd and it was estimated that there were approximately 10,000 supporters in attendance..

Speakers included former VA Governor Gilmore, who is running for the US Senate, Delegate Terry Kilgore, and other VA VIPs.

Also attending were Gov. Tom Rich (PA), Gov. Mel Martinez (FL), Senator Joe Liberman(CT), Senator Rich Burr (NC), Senator George Allen (VA)

Tennessee was started off with Minority Leader Mumpower, who introduced Rep Lungberg and Tony Shipley. Lt Governor Ramsey spoke and introduced State Senate candidate Mike Faulk.

US Senator Corker spoke and introduced US Senator Alexander. Former Presidential candidate, Senator Fred Thompson also spoke.

All speakers followed the normal McCain message with local emphasis placed on the Republican plan to use clean coal technology and NOT bankrupt the coal industry. Coal and energy were the main points main during today’s visit.

Senator McCain spoke about being ready to lead from the first day in office. "I have been tried and tested, and I am ready to be President of the United States," said McCain.

McCain was accompanied by his wife, who stood beside him throughout his speech.