Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Population’

Household Median Income for Tennessee Counties

July 30th, 2009 No comments

Below is the household median income for the top 20 Tennessee Counties that had the largest retail sales.  The household median income is for the county and may be different for cities within the county.  Below is the household median Income for Sullivan County cities

Kingsport  $34,391  – Individuals below poverty level 18.0%

Bristol  $36,454 – Individuals below poverty level 14.6%

Sullivan County – Individuals below poverty level 15.8%


CountyRankHousehold Median Income
Williamson1$84,205
Wilson2$60,503
Sumner3$52,970
Rutherford4$50,623
Montgomery5$49,248
Blount6$46,009
Knox7$45,309
Maury8$44,990
Davidson9$44,486
Hamilton10$44,384
Shelby11$43,512
Anderson12$41,346
Bradley13$39,761
Madison14$39,721
Sevier15$39,534
Washington16$39,238
Hamblen17$37,661
Sullivan18$37,559
Coffee19$37,076
Putnam20$34,923

 

Below is the household income distribution for Kingsport and the household median income for Kingsport is $34,391.  In the graph below there are 2,636 people who are living in poverty.

 

The 2009 Poverty Guidelines for the 48 Contiguous States and the District of Columbia

Persons in familyPoverty guideline
1$10,830
2$14,570
3$18,310
4$22,050
5$25,790
6$29,530
7$33,270
8$37,010

For families with more than 8 persons, add $3,740 for each additional person.

 

Young adults continue to leave Sullivan County, TN

July 29th, 2009 No comments

I would be embarrassed to be a current or past elected leader or those having been responsible for economic development in Sullivan County, Kingsport, and Bristol Tennessee.  The ongoing problem of several decades with the young adults leaving the area and the fact that Sullivan County and its cities have an older population has not been addressed to stop the pattern of a declining population.

I am sure that our elected leaders would not want to publicly discuss this subject, but this blog will continue to make the public aware of the situation.  In my opinion, having a company like Eastman Chemical and the Bristol Nascar Race is good for the area, but having them has made the area complacent and the leaders have not done enough to get other good paying jobs here.

There may be some who may be wondering why approach this subject because of the negative impact it may have on future people moving to the area.  My answer is that there are about two decades of not addressing this problem with results.  Enough is enough!!  Let’s get it out front and center so the citizens/leaders can understand the problems and find solutions.

The graph below is from the State of Tennessee and gives a comparison for Sullivan County against Tennessee.  The time span for the graph is from 1990 to 2000 and shows that Sullivan did lag behind in the number of young people residing in the county.  Note in the graph that it appears that the age bracket 18-24 shows that our young folks are leaving the area and the age bracket 25-44 only had a 0.1% increase.  The 65 and over age bracket in Sullivan County did better than the state with a 19.1 percent increase.

The last line in the graph gives the county rank and Sullivan County did not fare well.  In the 18-24 age bracket, Sullivan County came in as having the worst rank of all 95 counties in the state.  The 65 and over age bracket gave Sullivan County a better rank of 28.

Population Growth Rate (1990 to 2000) was 6.6% which gave Sullivan County a rank of 90 out of 95 counties.  The growth rate for years 2000- 2008 is .56%

*A rank of 1 indicates the best condition.

Population Growth by Age Bracket, 1990 to 2000

Using more current data from the U.S. Census shows that Sullivan County and its cities have a low birth rate, young adults are still leaving the area, high median age and a high percentage of older adults age 65 and over.

The age distribution graph below on the left shows that Kingsport has a greater number of young adults leaving the area and has more older adults.

The graph on the right compares Tennessee, Florida, and Sullivan County.  Most folks have an impression that Florida has a lot of retirement-age people, but Sullivan County has a larger percentage of older adults.

Percent 65 Years and Over

  • Kingsport, Tennessee  20.1
  • Bristol, Tennessee  19.5
  • Sullivan County, Tennessee  17.8
  • Florida  17.4

Median Age

  • Bristol, Tennessee  43.2
  • Sullivan County, Tennessee  42.9
  • Kingsport, Tennessee  42.6
  • Florida  39.8

2005-2007 age distribution data from U. S. Census

The City of Kingsport uses a method of water meter turn on and off to keep track of its movement in the population.  This method is flawed since the young adults are more likely living with their parents and would not be picked up by the water meter method when they leave the area.

Sullivan County death rate is higher than the birth rate and the county gained only 850 in population in the time span of 2000 to 2008.  The gain has come from new arrivals to the area.

Sullivan County is considered one of the larger populated counties in Tennessee.  In 1994, Sullivan County was the fifth most populated county.  Because of the growth in other counties and the declining population in Sullivan County, the rank of Sullivan County is estimated to be 11 in year 2030.

Tennessee County Ranking Report for Population Growth

July 27th, 2009 No comments

County Population Estimates

Annual Estimates of the Resident Population for Counties: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2008

Tennessee Counties are ranked in the table below as percent growth in the highlighted column.  Sullivan County growth rate was .56 percent and gained 852 people over an eight year period.  Sullivan County rank was 75 and Shelby County rank was 72.

Data is from U.S. Census and you can see data for all states by going to the following link.

County Population Estimates

Geographic AreaPopulation Estimate 07/01/2008Change, 2000 to 2008Rank
NumberPercent
Rutherford County249,27067,24736.94%1
Williamson County171,45244,81435.39%2
Fayette County38,1739,36732.53%3
Wilson County109,80320,99423.64%4
Sequatchie County13,5802,21019.44%5
Robertson County64,89810,46519.23%6
Sevier County84,83513,66519.20%7
Sumner County155,47425,02519.18%8
Bedford County44,6967,11018.92%9
Loudon County46,4457,35918.83%10
Maury County81,93812,44017.90%11
Monroe County45,6486,68717.16%12
Jefferson County51,0746,78015.31%13
Montgomery County154,75619,98814.83%14
Blount County121,51115,68814.82%15
Cumberland County53,5906,78814.50%16
Tipton County58,7067,43514.50%17
Putnam County71,1608,84514.20%18
Knox County430,01947,98712.56%19
Marshall County29,7312,96411.07%20
Dickson County47,8844,72810.96%21
Washington County118,63911,44110.67%22
Grainger County22,7082,0499.92%23
Davidson County626,14456,2539.87%24
Cheatham County39,3963,4849.70%25
Bradley County96,4728,5079.67%26
Tennessee6,214,888525,6059.24%
White County25,1292,0278.77%27
Coffee County52,1344,1208.58%28
Rhea County30,7812,3818.38%29
Hamilton County332,84824,9528.10%30
Moore County6,1954557.93%31
Smith County19,1071,3957.88%32
Trousdale County7,8225637.76%33
Cannon County13,8049787.63%34
Hawkins County57,4773,9147.31%35
DeKalb County18,6941,2717.30%36
McMinn County52,5113,4967.13%37
Macon County21,8381,4527.12%38
Hickman County23,8411,5466.93%39
Stewart County13,2268566.92%40
Hamblen County62,1324,0046.89%41
Union County19,0081,2006.74%42
Meigs County11,7907046.35%43
Cocke County35,6882,1236.33%44
Fentress County17,6671,0426.27%45
Bledsoe County13,1427756.27%46
Lincoln County33,1161,7765.67%47
Henderson County26,9161,3945.46%48
Greene County66,1573,2485.16%49
Claiborne County31,4611,5995.34%50
Chester County16,3097694.95%51
Madison County96,3764,5394.94%52
Carter County59,4922,7504.85%53
Franklin County41,1651,8954.83%54
Scott County22,0399124.32%55
McNairy County25,7241,0714.34%56
Overton County20,9758574.26%57
Warren County39,8421,5664.09%58
Anderson County74,1692,8393.98%59
Johnson County18,1126133.50%60
Morgan County20,4046473.27%61
Roane County53,4301,5202.93%62
Campbell County40,9361,0822.72%63
Lawrence County40,9541,0282.57%64
Hardin County26,2276492.54%65
Gibson County49,2571,1052.29%66
Henry County31,7706552.11%67
Lewis County11,5641971.73%68
Marion County28,2474711.70%69
Perry County7,7531221.60%70
Humphreys County18,1492201.23%71
Shelby County906,8259,3531.04%72
Dyer County37,6003210.86%73
Houston County8,137490.61%74
Sullivan County153,9008520.56%75
Unicoi County17,718510.29%76
Van Buren County5,481-27-0.49%77
Grundy County14,220-112-0.78%78
Giles County29,184-263-0.89%79
Hardeman County27,848-257-0.91%80
Jackson County10,847-137-1.25%81
Hancock County6,693-93-1.37%82
Wayne County16,614-228-1.35%83
Lauderdale County26,692-409-1.51%84
Benton County16,193-344-2.08%85
Clay County7,794-182-2.28%86
Crockett County14,186-346-2.38%87
Polk County15,671-379-2.36%88
Carroll County28,719-756-2.56%89
Pickett County4,801-144-2.91%90
Obion County31,375-1,075-3.31%91
Decatur County11,288-443-3.78%92
Haywood County19,024-773-3.90%93
Weakley County33,375-1,520-4.36%94
Lake County7,323-631-7.93%95

100 Fastest Growing Counties – Tennessee Has Three

July 27th, 2009 No comments

Tennessee has three counties that made it in the U.S.Census 100 Fastest Growing Counties.  You can see all 100 counties by clicking on the Excel link below.

Resident Population Estimates for the 100 Fastest Growing U.S. Counties with 10,000 or More Population in 2008: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2008(CO-EST2008-08)

Excel (30k) CSV (7k)

Table 8: Resident Population Estimates for the 100 Fastest Growing U.S. Counties with 10,000 or More Population in 2008: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2008

Rank

Geographic Area

Population Estimates

Change, 2000 to 2008

July 1, 2008

April 1, 2000 Estimates Base

Number

Percent

57

Rutherford County, TN

249,270

182,023

67,247

36.9

70

Williamson County, TN

171,452

126,641

44,811

35.4

87

Fayette County, TN

38,173

28,796

9,377

32.6

Median Age Continues to Rise in Sullivan County, TN

July 26th, 2009 No comments

The median age of the population in Sullivan County and its major cities has been rising.  This is a function of young adults leaving the area and the low birth rate.


TennesseeSullivan County
2008 U.S. Census Estimate37.242.9
2000 Census340
1990 Census3437

Below in the table are median ages for the nine largest Tennessee Counties, Tennessee and Florida.Median-Age.gif

Data in the graph from U.S.Census

State Ranking Report Shows Where People Retire

July 24th, 2009 No comments

Below is data that show the percent of people that are age 65 and older for the states below.  I have included Sullivan County, Tennessee and its two largest cities (Kingsport and Bristol).  The percent of poverty for those 65 and older in Sullivan County, TN is 15 percent and the household median income is $28,070.

The percent below is the percent of the population for the locations below.  Do not assume that the top three high-lighted areas below in the table are a haven for retires.  For the three high-lighted areas, it more of a function of low birth rates and young adults leaving the area.  There will have another post with the details on on all ages for Sullivan County, TN.

United States — States GCT-T4-R. Percent of the Total Population Who Are 65 Years and Over (geographies ranked by estimate). Data Set: 2008 Population Estimates

Rank

Geographic area

Percent 65 Years and Over

Kingsport, Tennessee

20.1*

Bristol, Tennessee

19.5*

Sullivan County, Tennessee

17.8

1

Florida

17.4

2

West Virginia

15.7

3

Pennsylvania

15.3

4

Maine

15.1

5t

Hawaii

14.8

5t

Iowa

14.8

7

North Dakota

14.7

8

South Dakota

14.4

9

Arkansas

14.3

10

Montana

14.2

11

Rhode Island

14.1

12t

Delaware

13.9

12t

Vermont

13.9

14

Alabama

13.8

15t

Connecticut

13.7

15t

Ohio

13.7

17

Missouri

13.6

18t

Nebraska

13.5

18t

Oklahoma

13.5

20t

Massachusetts

13.4

20t

New York

13.4

22t

Arizona

13.3

22t

Kentucky

13.3

22t

New Jersey

13.3

22t

Oregon

13.3

22t

South Carolina

13.3

22t

Wisconsin

13.3

28

Tennessee

13.2

29t

Kansas

13.1

29t

New Mexico

13.1

31

Michigan

13

32

New Hampshire

12.9

33

Indiana

12.8

34

Mississippi

12.6

35

Minnesota

12.5

36

North Carolina

12.4

37

Wyoming

12.3

38t

Illinois

12.2

38t

Louisiana

12.2

40t

Maryland

12.1

40t

Virginia

12.1

42t

Idaho

12

42t

Washington

12

44

District of Columbia

11.9

45

Nevada

11.4

46

California

11.2

47

Colorado

10.3

48

Texas

10.2

49

Georgia

10.1

50

Utah

9

51

Alaska

7.3

* – 2007 Estimate

All data is from U.S. Census

East TN County needs young adults to populate county

July 22nd, 2009 No comments

In the table below are the top nine largest populated counties in Tennessee.

The table shows that the Sullivan County death rate is 1,228 more than the birth rate.  Sullivan County had a Total Population Change of 850 people over an eight year period (April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2008) whereas Washington County that adjoins Sullivan County had a net gain of 11,441.

The data below is from U.S. Census and you can download the data set for any state at the following link.  The data is in XLS spreadsheet format. County Population Estimates

If you want to see just the Tennessee County data, go to the link below.

http://www.census.gov/popest/counties/tables/CO-EST2008-04-47.xls

Table 4: Cumulative Estimates of the Components of Resident Population Change for Counties of Tennessee: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2008
Geographic AreaTotal Population Change1Natural IncreaseVital EventsNet Migration
BirthsDeathsTotalInternational2Domestic
Shelby County9,35355,307119,38264,075-41,66112,192-53,853
Davidson County56,25533,87875,78141,903-1,09219,295-20,387
Rutherford County67,24717,21227,53810,32650,9142,41348,501
Montgomery County19,98613,34520,8217,4767,052-6017,653
Knox County47,98711,77041,88830,11831,7883,11128,677
Williamson County44,8119,79916,1426,34335,4941,69333,801
Hamilton County24,9386,95533,51726,5624,8343,3591,475
Sumner County25,0256,41315,7619,34819,2251,18518,040
Washington County11,4411,41911,0969,67710,5997659,834
Sullivan County850-1,22813,66014,8882,7126612,051

Using the data set from the U.S. Census and sorting all Tennessee Counties on the Natural Increase column shows Sullivan County as having the largest decrease for Natural Increase in the state.  Shown below are the top ten Tennessee Counties that had the largest Natural Decrease. (more deaths than births)

Table 4: Cumulative Estimates of the Components of Resident Population Change for Counties of Tennessee: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2008
Geographic AreaTotal Population Change1Natural IncreaseVital EventsNet Migration
BirthsDeathsTotalInternational2Domestic
Sullivan County850-1,22813,66014,8882,7126612,051
Roane County1,520-6334,4655,0982,3531602,193
Henry County667-6213,0183,6391,426851,341
Carroll County-767-5672,8883,455-8939-128
Unicoi County51-5621,5002,062681-4685
Gibson County1,108-5125,1455,6571,8571471,710
Cumberland County6,789-5054,3214,8267,434667,368
Benton County-344-4641,3601,82420214188
Hardin County649-4022,3382,7401,167331,134
Carter County2,752-3965,0265,4223,3191473,172
1 Total population change includes a residual. This residual represents the change in population that cannot be attributed to any specific demographic component. See State and County Terms and Definitions at http://www.census.gov/popest/topics/terms/state
2 Net international migration includes the international migration of both native and foreign-born populations. Specifically, it includes: (a) the net international migration of the foreign born, (b) the net migration between the United States and Puerto
Note: The April 1, 2000 estimates base reflects changes to the Census 2000 population resulting from legal boundary updates, other geographic program changes, and Count Question Resolution actions. All geographic boundaries for the 2008 population estima
Suggested Citation:
Table 4: Cumulative Estimates of the Components of Resident Population Change for Counties of Tennessee: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2008 (CO-EST2008-04-47)
Source: Population Division, U.S. Census Bureau
Release Date: March 19, 2009

Population Comparison For Top Nine Largest Tennessee Counties

July 20th, 2009 No comments

Google has a neat way of plotting State and County population by just clicking on a state or counties within a state.  The public U.S. Census data is shown as in the graphs below and its quick and easy to see the exact population for a given year by moving your mouse over the plotted line.  The population data available for plotting goes back to 1980.

Below on the left is Sullivan County population and the right side graph shows nine of the largest counties in Tennessee.  Sullivan County population is not growing and has not shown any significant growth for some time.  Elected officials and economic development folks for Sullivan County and its cities should review so they can see the progress they have made in prior years.

The link is:  Graph other states and counties

imageimage

Update: Against Building Taxpayer Funded Denominational Medical School in East TN

July 16th, 2009 No comments

King College, a denominational college located in Bristol, Tennessee, has been in discussions with Kingsport, Bristol, and Sullivan County officials to build a medical school in Kingsport and Bristol.

The cost for the medical school would be about $150 million.  King is looking for $50 million to come from the cities of Kingsport ($40 million) and Bristol ($10 million), $50 million from the State of Tennessee, and the remaining $50 million from private donations.

At the July 7, 2009, Kingsport, Tennessee Board of Mayor and Alderman, a resolution was passed on first reading to endorse the King College Medical School Initiative, and pledged its commitment to work with Bristol, Sullivan County, and King College to advance the project.

While it does sound like a good project for the area, there will be a major impact on the taxpayers if this is funded via a property tax increase.

Mayor Dennis Phillips has stated that if Kingsport were to fund $40 million for the project, property taxes would have to be raised 25 cents.

Below are tax rates that have been extracted from the Tennessee Property Tax Rates that show the top 20 cities that have the highest tax rates in Tennessee from 406 different tax rates for the different cities and counties.

I have added 25 cents to the tax rates for the two Kingsport line items (Kingsport-Sullivan and Kingsport-Hawkins) in the table below.  Kingsport, with the 25 cents added, would have a rank of 10 and 12 as having the most expensive tax rates in the state.  Bristol has a rank of 14 and I have no knowledge if they would increase property taxes.

Top 20 Cities with the most expensive property tax rates
R
a
n
k
CountyCityTotal County and City TaxProperty Tax for $150k HomeHousehold Median Income% Taxes from Household IncomeMedian Home Value
1SHELBY MEMPHIS $7.29$2,734$32,2858.47%$130,695
2SHELBY GERMANTOWN $5.63$2,111$113,7331.86%$278,800
3SHELBY BARTLETT $5.63$2,111$74,0912.85%$164,600
4KNOX KNOXVILLE $5.50$2,063$32,5386.34%$102,300
5ANDERSON OAK RIDGE $5.45$2,044$45,4744.49%$120,100
6SHELBY COLLIERVILLE $5.37$2,014$99,2392.03%$255,400
7HAMILTON CHATTANOOGA $5.36$2,009$35,9135.59%$121,100
8SHELBY MILLINGTON $5.32$1,995$43,7534.56%$124,144
9MADISON HUMBOLDT $5.30$1,988$50,0073.98%$181,800
10HAWKINS KINGSPORT $5.11*$1,916$34,3915.57%$99,900
11SHELBY ARLINGTON $5.09$1,909$59,1313.23%$233,597
12SULLIVAN KINGSPORT $5.08*$1,905$34,3915.54%$99,900
13ROANE OAK RIDGE $5.04$1,890$45,4744.16%$120,100
14SULLIVAN BRISTOL $5.03$1,886$36,4545.17%$94,000
15MORGAN OAKDALE $4.98$1,868$32,1745.81%$47,502
16COFFEE MANCHESTER $4.96$1,860$36,6745.07%$112,275
17HAMILTON LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN $4.95$1,858$117,7671.58%$515,354
18HAMILTON RIDGESIDE $4.95$1,858$103,9951.79%$293,387
19LAUDERDALE HENNING $4.95$1,856$23,4077.93%$65,212
20HAMILTON SIGNAL MOUNTAIN $4.93$1,848$78,1752.36%$283,948

* The current city and county combined tax rate for Kingsport-Sullivan County is $4.86 and Kingsport-Hawkins County is $4.86.  Twenty-five cents has been added to each of the Kingsport tax rates in the above table.


The table below again shows the top 20 cites and the effect on the taxpayers’ Household Median Income.  There appears to be a disconnect with those cities having a high tax rate, lower Household Median Income and the percentage of Household Income needed to pay property taxes.

The household median income for Kingsport is $34,391 and the Kingsport majority of Kingsport property owners would pay over 5.5 percent of household income ($150k home) for property taxes if  the 25 cents is added to the Kingsport tax rate.  The Kingsport rank is 6 and 7 and Bristol comes in at a rank of 8 in the table below for the largest percent of household income needed to pay property taxes.

A taxpayer funded medical school would reduce the already low Kingsport household income and would reduce the standard of living for the majority of Kingsport citizens so the city could reap the benefits of increased revenue to spend on other pet projects.

Top 20 Cities that take the highest percentage of income for property taxes
R
a
n
k
CountyCityTotal County and City TaxProperty Tax for $150k HomeHousehold Median Income% Taxes from Household IncomeMedian Home Value
1SHELBY MEMPHIS $7.29$2,734$32,2858.47%$130,695
2LAUDERDALE HENNING $4.95$1,856$23,4077.93%$65,212
3KNOX KNOXVILLE $5.50$2,063$32,5386.34%$102,300
4MORGAN OAKDALE $4.98$1,868$32,1745.81%$47,502
5HAMILTON CHATTANOOGA $5.36$2,009$35,9135.59%$121,100
6HAWKINS KINGSPORT $5.11*$1,916$34,3915.57%$99,900
7SULLIVAN KINGSPORT $5.08*$1,905$34,3915.54%$99,900
8SULLIVAN BRISTOL $5.03$1,886$36,4545.17%$94,000
9COFFEE MANCHESTER $4.96$1,860$36,6745.07%$112,275
10SHELBY MILLINGTON $5.32$1,995$43,7534.56%$124,144
11ANDERSON OAK RIDGE $5.45$2,044$45,4744.49%$120,100
12ROANE OAK RIDGE $5.04$1,890$45,4744.16%$120,100
13MADISON HUMBOLDT $5.30$1,988$50,0073.98%$181,800
14SHELBY ARLINGTON $5.09$1,909$59,1313.23%$233,597
15SHELBY BARTLETT $5.63$2,111$74,0912.85%$164,600
16HAMILTON SIGNAL MOUNTAIN $4.93$1,848$78,1752.36%$283,948
17SHELBY COLLIERVILLE $5.37$2,014$99,2392.03%$255,400
18SHELBY GERMANTOWN $5.63$2,111$113,7331.86%$278,800
19HAMILTON RIDGESIDE $4.95$1,858$103,9951.79%$293,387
20HAMILTON LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN $4.95$1,858$117,7671.58%$515,354

* The current city and county combined tax rate for Kingsport-Sullivan County is $4.86 and Kingsport-Hawkins County is $4.86.  Twenty-five cents has been added to each of the Kingsport tax rates in the above table.


I have heard some members of the Kingsport BMA express their desire to have a college located in Kingsport.  They should keep in mind that there are very large number of cities that have been successful without having a college and who also have a better standard of living than Kingsport.

College Cities

Household Median Income

Knoxville$32,538
Bristol$36,454
Chattanooga$35,913
Johnson City$35,746
Memphis$35,181

The above cities that have a college appear not to have increased the standard of living and have a low household median income.

Below is the household income distribution for Kingsport and the household median income for Kingsport is $34,391.  In the graph below there are 2,636 people who earn less than $10,000  classifying them as living in poverty.

I challenge the elected officials to venture outside of their social and political groups and try to understand the plight of the majority of wage earners in the Kingsport area.  The medical school would bring jobs, but some of these jobs will be imported jobs and the common folks would not have the background or training for these jobs.  Ask what you can do to raise the standard of living (higher income) for Kingsport citizens without imposing a property tax burden.

I feel that the taxpayers should not be taking the risk of funding a medical school when there already is a state funded one in Johnson City.  The need for doctors in this area is questionable since the population is declining in Sullivan County.  If they area has trouble attracting doctors or keeping doctors, then take a hard look at the reason.

Quality of Life issues are important, but a good Standard of Living for local folks just might make the area prosper by increased spending by the majority of citizens.

The bottom line is that the area needs good paying jobs without the additional burden on the taxpayers.

I need to point out that no funding has been voted on so far, but projects such as this grows legs very fast and then its then to late to react.  The intent of this post is to make you aware of the issues so you can make your views know.  Update:  Many elected officials have expressed their support of this project including Lt. Governor Ron Ramsey who may make it a part of his campaign for governor.  Again, I must point out that I am not against the project but am very concerned about it being funded by taxpayers.

Please contact your elected officials and tell them NO to a taxpayer funded denominational medical school.  Click on the email links below and add your comments in your own email program.

email Kingsport BMA
Mayor Dennis Phillips
Vice Mayor Ben Mallicote
Alderman Larry Munsey
Alderman Jantry Shupe
Alderwoman Valerie Joh
Alderman Ken Marsh, Jr.
Alderman Tom Parham
email Tennessee Legislators for area
Lt. Governor Ron Ramsey
Senator Mike Faulk
Rep. Jason E. Mumpower
Rep. Tony Shipley
Rep. Jon Lundberg
Rep. Dale Ford
email Sullivan County Commissioners
See list for
Commissioners individual emails
or
email Mayor and all Sullivan County Commissioners
email this post to a friend
email Candidates for Tennessee Governor
Mike McWherter
Roy Herron
Ward Cammack
Zack Wamp
Bill Haslam
Ron Ramsey
Kim McMillan
Jim Kyle

Sullivan County declining population – It’s time for a new direction!

July 13th, 2009 No comments

Sullivan County, Tennessee and its cities have a problem with a declining population.  This has been a problem since year 2000 and Sullivan County comes out as the loser as keeping the population.  Elected leaders need to ask some hard questions why this is occurring and make changes to stop this trend.  Elected leaders may be faced with cutting services or raise taxes because of reduced revenue coming in.  However, cutting services or raising taxes and not addressing the problem would show that the elected leaders is not capable of handling the problem.

In the table below are the top 11 Tennessee Counties and their population rank based on state population estimates.  Sullivan County goes from a year 2000 rank of 6 to a rank of 11 in year 2030.

Rank

2000

2005

2010

2015

2020

2025

2030

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Shelby
Davidson
Knox
Hamilton
Rutherford
Sullivan
Montgomery
Sumner
Williamson
Washington
Blount
Shelby
Davidson
Knox
Hamilton
Rutherford
Sullivan
Williamson
Montgomery
Sumner
Blount
Washington
Shelby Davidson Knox Hamilton Rutherford Williamson Sumner Montgomery Sullivan Blount WashingtonShelby
Davidson
Knox
Hamilton
Rutherford
Williamson
Sumner
Montgomery
Sullivan
Blount
Wilson
Shelby
Davidson
Knox
Rutherford
Hamilton
Williamson
Sumner
Montgomery
Blount
Sullivan
Wilson
Shelby
Davidson
Knox
Rutherford
Hamilton
Williamson
Sumner
Montgomery
Blount
Wilson
Sullivan
Shelby
Davidson
Knox
Rutherford
Hamilton
Williamson
Sumner
Montgomery
Blount
Wilson
Sullivan

Below are graphs for selected East Tennessee county and city population estimates.  In the “County Population Estimates”, all counties are showing growth while Sullivan County is showing a decline.

The “City Population Estimates” graph shows population growth for all cities except Sullivan County cities, Kingsport and Bristol.

Data for the above is from the State of Tennessee via the links below.

Population Projections for the State of Tennessee

TACIR, in conjunction with The University of Tennessee Center for Business and Economic Research, has published a new report containing population projections for Tennessee cities and counties in five-year intervals from 2010 to 2030. The purpose of the projections is to aid in local planning efforts, such as those outlined in Public Chapter 1101 (PC1101). The complete report and tables are available below.

Population Projections for the State of Tennessee, 2010 to 2030 Adobe Acrobat Required

Population Projection Tables HTML | EXCEL

  • Aggregate Projections for Tennessee HTML | EXCEL
  • Aggregate Projections for Tennessee Counties HTML | EXCEL
  • Aggregate Projections for Municipalities* Arrayed by County HTML | EXCEL
  • Aggregate Projections for Municipalities* Alphabetically HTML | EXCEL
  • Aggregate Projections for Municipalities* by Development District HTML | EXCEL
  • Aggregate Projections for Tennessee Counties within MSAs HTML | EXCEL

*Does not include the effects of annexations after 2000.