Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Population’

Kingsport, Tennessee High Crime Rate

October 19th, 2009 No comments

image Below is data that was obtained form the website NeighborhoodScout which gives some interesting data concerning the high crime rate in Kingsport, Tennessee.  Kingsport is ranked as having a high crime rank by NeighborhoodScout and states that  Kingsport’s crime rate is higher than the average for the State of Tennessee and  United States.

Are our city officials more concerned about putting in a new swimming pool, expanding the convention center, building more hotels, annexing more property, getting more restaurants, etc. than reducing the high crime rate in Kingsport?

Kingsport, TN Elected Officials – Board of Mayor and Alderman

If you have a concern about the crime in the city of Kingsport, click on the city officials names above to send them an email.

NeighborhoodScout

With a crime rate of 89 per one thousand residents, Kingsport has one of the highest crime rates in America compared to all communities of all sizes – from the smallest towns to the very largest cities. One’s chance of becoming a victim of either violent or property crime here is one in 11. Within Tennessee, more than 90% of the communities have a lower crime rate than Kingsport.

Separately, it is always interesting and important to compare a city’s crime rate with those of similarly sized communities – a fair comparison as larger cities tend to have more crime. NeighborhoodScout has done just that. With a population of 44,560, Kingsport has a combined rate of violent and property crime that is very high compared to other places of similar population size. Regardless of whether Kingsport does well or poorly compared to all other cities and towns in the US of all sizes, compared to places with a similar population, it fares badly. Few other communities of this size have a crime rate as high as Kingsport.

The crime data that NeighborhoodScout used for this analysis are the seven offenses from the uniform crime reports, collected by the FBI from 17,000 local law enforcement agencies, and include both violent and property crimes, combined.

Now let us turn to take a look at how Kingsport does for violent crimes specifically, and then how it does for property crimes. This is important because the overall crime rate can be further illuminated by understanding if violent crime or property crimes (or both) are the major contributors to the general rate of crime in Kingsport.

For Kingsport, we found that the violent crime rate is one of the highest in the nation, across communities of all sizes (both large and small). Violent offenses tracked included forcible rape, murder and non-negligent manslaughter, armed robbery, and aggravated assault, including assault with a deadly weapon. According to NeighborhoodScout’s analysis of FBI reported crime data, your chance of becoming a victim of one of these crimes in Kingsport is one in 107.

In addition, NeighborhoodScout found that a lot of the crime that takes place in Kingsport is property crime. Property crimes that are tracked for this analysis are burglary, larceny over fifty dollars, motor vehicle theft, and arson. In Kingsport, your chance of becoming a victim of a property crime is one in 13, which is a rate of 80 per one thousand population.

Click here to see the data below as well as a map showing where the safest places are in Kingsport.  At the top of the page you can get data for a different city.

image

image

BJS North America East Celebrates Grand Opening in Jefferson County

October 16th, 2009 No comments

Dandridge, TN will get 150 new jobs thanks to the efforts of city, county and state officials.  While these jobs are closer to Sullivan County, we have yet to hear anything about new jobs for Sullivan County.  Another missed opportunity for Sullivan County!

New Manufacturing Facility Creates 150 Jobs

NASHVILLE — Tennessee Economic and Community Development Commissioner Matt Kisber along with BJS North America East, Inc., a Swedish furniture manufacturer specializing primarily in bedroom accessories, announced today the grand opening of a new manufacturing facility in Dandridge, Tenn. This move brings a $6-8 million investment to Dandridge, creating approximately 150 jobs.

“Governor Bredesen and I welcome BJS North America East to the Volunteer State,” Commissioner Kisber said. “We’ve worked hard to create a business friendly climate in Tennessee, and we are grateful for BJS North America East’s investment in our citizens and state.”

The company will celebrate the opening of the new facility with a ceremony and ribbon cutting on Friday, Oct. 16 at 11 a.m. at 1000 Industrial Park Road in Dandridge. In addition to the ribbon cutting, BJS will also be celebrating the production of the one millionth piece of furniture for Swedish furniture company IKEA. Local Jefferson County community leaders and several Swedish dignitaries will be in attendance at the ceremony.

With the help of city, county and state officials, the principles of BJS, Pär Lidåker and Kaj Johansson, have partnered with Klote International Corporation official Carl-Gösta Torstensson to bring this facility to Dandridge. The new manufacturing facility located in the Dandridge Industrial Park contains 95,000 square feet of production, warehouse and office space. Read more…

Shocking News About Sullivan County Aging Population

October 8th, 2009 1 comment

I have done many posts concerning the median age and population in Sullivan County, Tennessee and  Sullivan County has one of the oldest populations in the state (click here to view the data).

The data below is from the state and I hope will help illustrate exactly what will happen if Sullivan County continues as it has in the past.

Below in the graph is a breakdown on the population for the different age groups in Sullivan County for the census year 2000 and projections for year 2025.  Sullivan County population in year 2000 was 153,048 and is projected to be 161,262 in year 2025.

Note that in the graph below that the 2025 population for all age groups are less for age groups that are under the 55 to 59 age group.  The year 2025 graph shows that the population numbers shows the population growing for for ages group 55 and up.  The largest single age group with the largest population is the age group 75 and up and the larger part of them are females.

Sulivan-County-2000-to-2025

Is Sullivan County equipped to handle the aging population?  There should great demand for those businesses offering services to the elderly.  But, if you are a pediatric physician, you might want to start your practice elsewhere because of the low birth rate in Sullivan County.

The table below gives the actual population numbers for the different age groups.  I have added the year 2010 which is not plotted in the above graph so you can see what is projected for 2010.  The data from the state is given as number of males and females for each age group and I have added the male and female population numbers together in the table below and the graph.

Population Projections for Sullivan County, TN



Year
Age Group 2000 2010 2025
0 to 4 8,542 8,593 7,897
5 to 9 9,411 9,012 8,498
10 to 14 9,709 8,697 8,538
15 to 19 9,204 8,330 7,514
20 to 24 7,778 8,692 7,638
25 to 29 9,625 9,751 8,180
30 to 34 10,420 8,669 9,154
35 to 39 11,534 10,078 9,887
40 to 44 11,873 10,864 10,597
45 to 49 11,543 11,697 9,357
50 to 54 11,241 11,644 10,368
55 to 59 9,776 11,501 11,410
60 to 64 8,066 10,981 11,817
65 to 69 6,919 9,112 11,197
70 to 74 6,358 6,981 9,705
75 and up 11,049 13,960 19,506
Total 153,048 158,560 161,262

You can view the data for other Tennessee Counties which includes projections for every five years up to year 2025.  Click on the link below to go to the Tennessee webpage

Demographic Information on Age-Gender Composition

In addition to the population projections for each Tennessee city and county contained in the report above, you may access more detailed cohort-component data for a city or county below. (Please note that updated demographic projections will be forthcoming.)

Please either click a county on the Tennessee state map or click a county name in the alphabetical list below the map to access the cohort-component data. Note the Word of Caution following table listed below.

Click here to view state data for Tennessee Counties


I am one of the older population and am concerned about the future of Sullivan County.   No, you can’t move us out of the county, but you should be concerned about the future of the county when we have left this world.  There must be something in place to keep young people in Sullivan County.  A good start would be get companies that have good paying jobs to locate here.   If you too are concerned, talk to your elected officials.  You can email them at the following links.

email Kingsport BMA

email Candidates for Tennessee Governor

email Tennessee Legislators for area

email Sullivan County Commissioners

See list for

or

Comments are welcome.

Tennessee Counties Median Age Ranking Report

October 5th, 2009 No comments

The table below shows the median age for all of the 95 Tennessee counties.  Sullivan County has a rank of 5 for higher median age and is the 9th largest county in Tennessee.  Data is from the links below.

Population of Tennessee Counties in 2008

Population Estimates by Age in 2008

Rank Tennessee Counties (or equivalents) Median Age Population
1 Benton, TN 43.9 16,193
2 Cumberland, TN 43.7 53,590
3 Pickett, TN 43.5 4,801
4 Unicoi, TN 43.3 17,718
5 Sullivan, TN 42.9 153,900
6 Roane, TN 42.7 53,430
7 Henry, TN 42.6 31,770
8 Clay, TN 42.4 7,794
9 Loudon, TN 42.1 46,445
10 Anderson, TN 41.8 74,169
10 Decatur, TN 41.8 11,288
12 Johnson, TN 41.7 18,112
13 Jackson, TN 41.5 10,847
13 Moore, TN 41.5 6,195
15 Hardin, TN 41.3 26,227
15 Obion, TN 41.3 31,375
17 Giles, TN 40.9 29,184
18 Carroll, TN 40.8 28,719
18 Hancock, TN 40.8 6,693
18 Polk, TN 40.8 15,671
21 Humphreys, TN 40.7 18,149
22 Greene, TN 40.6 66,157
23 Hawkins, TN 40.5 57,477
24 Houston, TN 40.4 8,137
24 Lincoln, TN 40.4 33,116
24 Perry, TN 40.4 7,753
27 Carter, TN 40.3 59,492
27 McNairy, TN 40.3 25,724
27 Stewart, TN 40.3 13,226
30 Campbell, TN 40.2 40,936
30 Van Buren, TN 40.2 5,481
32 Cocke, TN 40.1 35,688
32 Overton, TN 40.1 20,975
34 Claiborne, TN 40 31,461
35 Marion, TN 39.9 28,247
36 Hamilton, TN 39.8 332,848
37 Blount, TN 39.7 121,511
37 Fentress, TN 39.7 17,667
37 Gibson, TN 39.7 49,257
37 White, TN 39.7 25,129
41 Bledsoe, TN 39.6 13,142
41 Franklin, TN 39.6 41,165
41 McMinn, TN 39.6 52,511
44 Sevier, TN 39.5 84,835
45 Grainger, TN 39.3 22,708
46 Cannon, TN 39.2 13,804
47 Crockett, TN 39.1 14,186
48 Trousdale, TN 39 7,822
48 Wayne, TN 39 16,614
50 Lewis, TN 38.8 11,564
51 Coffee, TN 38.7 52,134
52 DeKalb, TN 38.6 18,694
53 Dyer, TN 38.5 37,600
53 Lawrence, TN 38.5 40,954
53 Meigs, TN 38.5 11,790
53 Morgan, TN 38.5 20,404
53 Washington, TN 38.5 118,639
58 Hamblen, TN 38.4 62,132
58 Union, TN 38.4 19,008
60 Henderson, TN 38.2 26,916
60 Smith, TN 38.2 19,107
60 Warren, TN 38.2 39,842
63 Cheatham, TN 38.1 39,396
63 Grundy, TN 38.1 14,220
63 Hickman, TN 38.1 23,841
66 Haywood, TN 38 19,024
66 Jefferson, TN 38 51,074
68 Rhea, TN 37.8 30,781
69 Hardeman, TN 37.7 27,848
69 Knox, TN 37.7 430,019
69 Monroe, TN 37.7 45,648
69 Sumner, TN 37.7 155,474
73 Marshall, TN 37.5 29,731
73 Sequatchie, TN 37.5 13,580
75 Bradley, TN 37.4 96,472
75 Williamson, TN 37.4 171,452
77 Wilson, TN 37.3 109,803
78 Dickson, TN 37.2 47,884
79 Weakley, TN 37.1 33,375
80 Macon, TN 37 21,838
81 Maury, TN 36.9 81,938
82 Davidson, TN 36.8 626,144
83 Madison, TN 36.5 96,376
84 Lake, TN 36.3 7,323
84 Scott, TN 36.3 22,039
86 Chester, TN 36.1 16,309
87 Lauderdale, TN 36 26,692
87 Robertson, TN 36 64,898
89 Shelby, TN 35.8 906,825
90 Tipton, TN 35.6 58,706
91 Fayette, TN 35.3 38,173
92 Putnam, TN 35 71,160
93 Bedford, TN 34.5 44,696
94 Montgomery, TN 33.1 154,756
95 Rutherford, TN 32.2 249,270
Source: US Census Bureau

Business and Personal Bankruptcy Ranking for Tennessee

October 5th, 2009 No comments

The recession has hit Tennessee with business and personal Bankruptcies.  Below in the table is the bankruptcy by chapter and type for 2nd quarter of 2009.  Note the rank that Tennessee has by clicking on the highlighted link in blue. In the data below, Chapter 13 personal bankruptcy is the third worst in the nation in Tennessee.

Elected officials should think twice about raising taxes, funding a pet project at taxpayers expense.


Tennessee -  Bankruptcy by Chapter and Type in Qtr:2 of 2009** Number Rank Percent Distribution Rank
Business Bankruptcy
Total 333 15 100.0%  
Chapter 7 219 16 65.8% 37
Chapter 11 88 10 26.4% 10
Chapter 12 7 4 2.1% 13
Chapter 13 19 20 5.7% 33
Personal Bankruptcy
Total 13,012 8 100.0%  
Chapter 7 6,704 12 51.5% 47
Chapter 11 21 5 0.2% 7
Chapter 13 6,287 3 48.3% 5

**Source: Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts

In the table above, Tennessee has a rank of 8 for total personal bankruptcy.  However if you consider the population, Tennessee is the 2nd worst state for bankruptcy per person in the 2nd quarter of 2009 as indicated in the table below.


State Population Bankruptcies Bankruptcy Rank per Person Bankruptcy per Person
Nevada 2,600,167 7,930 1 0.0030
Tennessee 6,214,888 13,012 2 0.0021
Indiana 6,376,792 12,885 3 0.0020
Alabama 4,661,900 8,508 4 0.0018
Georgia 9,685,744 17,585 5 0.0018
Michigan 10,003,422 17,690 6 0.0018
Ohio 11,485,910 18,418 7 0.0016
Kentucky 4,269,245 6,274 8 0.0015
Colorado 4,939,456 7,113 9 0.0014
California 36,756,666 51,239 10 0.0014
Missouri 5,911,605 8,149 11 0.0014
Illinois 12,901,563 17,740 12 0.0014
Arkansas 2,855,390 3,893 13 0.0014
Utah 2,736,424 3,664 14 0.0013
Wisconsin 5,627,967 7,505 15 0.0013
Arizona 6,500,180 8,646 16 0.0013
Florida 18,328,340 24,111 17 0.0013
Oregon 3,790,060 4,865 18 0.0013
Idaho 1,523,816 1,955 19 0.0013
Rhode Island 1,050,788 1,302 20 0.0012
Mississippi 2,938,618 3,494 21 0.0012
Virginia 7,769,089 9,149 22 0.0012
Washington 6,549,224 7,648 23 0.0012
Maryland 5,633,597 6,233 24 0.0011
Nebraska 1,783,432 1,903 25 0.0011
Kansas 2,802,134 2,933 26 0.0010
Minnesota 5,220,393 5,404 27 0.0010
New Jersey 8,682,661 8,763 28 0.0010
Louisiana 4,410,796 4,451 29 0.0010
Oklahoma 3,642,361 3,519 30 0.0010
New Hampshire 1,315,809 1,199 31 0.0009
Iowa 3,002,555 2,696 32 0.0009
West Virginia 1,814,468 1,607 33 0.0009
Massachusetts 6,497,967 5,455 34 0.0008
Montana 967,440 768 35 0.0008
Delaware 873,092 680 36 0.0008
Maine 1,316,456 1,011 37 0.0008
New York 19,490,297 14,867 38 0.0008
Pennsylvania 12,448,279 9,389 39 0.0008
Connecticut 3,501,252 2,575 40 0.0007
North Carolina 9,222,414 6,635 41 0.0007
New Mexico 1,984,356 1,419 42 0.0007
Wyoming 532,668 364 43 0.0007
North Dakota 641,481 429 44 0.0007
South Dakota 804,194 525 45 0.0007
Vermont 621,270 379 46 0.0006
Hawaii 1,288,198 752 47 0.0006
Texas 24,326,974 12,700 48 0.0005
South Carolina 4,479,800 2,278 49 0.0005
District of Columbia 591,833 285 50 0.0005
Alaska 686,293 241 51 0.0004

Past and New Direction of the No WhiteWash! Blog

September 3rd, 2009 No comments

This blog was started in February 2007 with the title of “Kingsport, TN Government”.  The name was later changed to “No WhiteWash!”, a name less focused on one local government.  We are still focused on Kingsport, TN Government and have expanded into issues that affect Sullivan County, North East Tennessee area, and the State as they are in a lot of case interrelated.

The direction of this blog for the future will be for the average citizen and not the elites who choose to run things for their own self-interest.  There will be no favoritism toward a political party in this blog.  WARNING:  If you are a elected official or running for office and make statements that you can’t back up or not exactly telling the full story, then this blog will expose them.  If you are running for office or an elected official who wants to use this blog for political advantage, then I would suggest you go elsewhere to peddle your story.  This blog is for the people!!

This little blog now has readership that is around 1,000 visits per day and that number could be much higher because other blogs re-publish this blog posts to their blogs.  There have been over 1,700 posts written in this blog since inception and the posts are not forgotten as they slide down the page as newer post take their place on the first page.  The search traffic coming to this blog is very large because this blog posts are indexed on all of the major search engines (Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, etc).  All of the posts go into a RSS news feed where readers can read the posts without having to visit the blog.  The folks using the RSS feed amounts to many hundred per day.

Over the last few years I have seen more local people become more vocal about expressing their views concerning how the local governments operate.  They express their views in the comments areas in the local newspapers, blogs, social media sites (Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, etc)  There have been many local blogs that have been started in the North East Tennessee area in the last few years and I think we will see more of it.

Blogs do get a lot of readership.  The Tea Party protests got their start from blogs and with very little help from local media.

The Show blog is another local blog that has come online and also has it own local talk radio show on Monday and Thursday from 6-8pm on WMCH AM1260.  Local issues are discussed in this radio talk show and in many cases the posts from this blog are discussed and the radio talk show does allow callers to phone in and express their views. 

I have learned much about the City of Kingsport government on how they operate.  The research that I have done has me very concerned about how the “elites” control the city and do things that are in their self-interests.  I do have a concern about their lack to fully understand the problems the area has such as low median wages, declining population, high unemployment, lack of good paying jobs, and young adults leaving the area to find work, etc.

I also have a concern how the mayor selects political appointees to serve on different committees so he can be assured that he get what he wants.  The reporting in the Kingsport Times-News is almost always, in my view, protecting the city officials.  One has to understand that if they reported anything negative about the city, then it would reflect on the upper management at the Kingsport Times-News.  This is because there are many of the top management at the Times-News that are Mayor Dennis Phillips’ political appointees.

We could go on about how certain people decide who should run for political office and then campaign for them and put up the money for them to get elected.

We could talk about the Ridgefield County Club elites or look at the details of the spending of city money by the Kingsport Chamber of Commerce, but these could be posts for another day.

There have been many that have sent this blog information concerning the operation of our local governments and I want to say thank you.  Please continue reporting as you have in the past.

If you have anything to report concerning the below areas, feel free to use the email icon below to report it. The source of the information will be kept confidential.

  • City of Kingsport, TN
  • City of Bristol, TN
  • Sullivan County, TN
  • North East, TN
  • Tennessee Government

Issues such as wasteful spending, local elections, annexation, ethics, crime, conflicts of interest, backroom deals, open government, abuse of taxpayer money, etc., are examples to report, but not limited to those listed.

North East TN Republican Controlled County in Trouble

August 30th, 2009 3 comments

Update: This blog has sent the post below to 83 people via email or U.S.Mail that are in the list below.

Kingsport Board of Mayor and Alderman
Mayor of Sullivan County
Sullivan County Commissioners
Bristol City Council
Bluff City Mayor and Alderman
Kingsport Chamber of Commerce
Tennessee Legislators for North East TN
U.S. Congress Legislators for North East TN
Commissioner Matt Kisber- TN Economic & Community Development
Governor Phil Bredesen
Tennessee Candidates for Governor
NETWORKS Sullivan Partnership Board of Directors and Members


Below is a graph and data table that shows the 1980-2005 actual populations and the projections for the years 2010-2030 for the eleven largest counties in Tennessee.  The data below will show that the estimated population in year 2030 will be less than it was in 1980 for Sullivan County.

I am sure that the past and current elected leaders will want this graph and the facts below to disappear because it reflects on their lack of response to address the problem with Sullivan County and its cities in its declining population and other problems in the Sullivan County area.  This blog will continue to expose the facts and there will be ”No Spin” and “No WhiteWash! of the data presented on this blog.

    Top Eleven Largest Counties Population – 1980 to 2030

Data for the graph and the table below is from the following links State and County Population and Population Projections for the State of Tennessee

Other Facts
  • In 1980, Sullivan County was the fifth largest county and it is estimated that in 2030, Sullivan County will be the eleventh largest county.
  • The population of Sullivan County is an older population and the median age for Sullivan County is 42.9 years, Tennessee is 37.2 years and Florida is 39.8 years.  The Percent 65 Years and Over for Kingsport is 20.1%, Bristol is 19.5%, Sullivan County is 17.8% and Florida is 17.4%.
  • Sullivan County and its cities, (Kingsport and Bristol) have a large number of young adults leaving the area.
  • The death rate for Sullivan County is more than the birth rate.
  • Sullivan County birth rate is low as compared to the state.
  • Sullivan County only gained 852 people between years 2000 to 2008 which gave a net gain of 0.56 percent growth.
  • Average Household median income is low for the area.  Kingsport is $34,391, Bristol is $36,454, and Sullivan County is $37,559. Two people in the same household making the new Federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour would make $30,160 per year.
  • The percent of poverty for those 65 and older in Sullivan County, TN is 12.2%, Kingsport is 11.6%, and Bristol is 16.2%. These percentages are 2007 numbers and could be higher due to the recession.  The household median income for 65 and older in Sullivan County is $28,070.
  • The poverty level for Kingsport is 18%, Bristol is 14.6%, and Sullivan County is 15.8%.  These percentages are 2007 numbers and could be higher due to the recession.  Poverty level for 2009 is defined for a person’s income to be $10,830 per year.
  • Kiplinger’s Personal Finance survey rates the Kingsport MSA as having the highest cost of living, low median income and the worst job growth out of 10 major cities/metro areas in Tennessee.
  • The area unemployment is high with Kingsport having the highest unemployment – See link for more details Jobs/Unemployment
  • The Republican Party has continuously controlled Tennessee’s 1st Congressional District since 1881.  It appears for the most part that most of the new jobs are going to the more Democrat Party area.
  • Kingsport has publicly stated that they would like to make Kingsport a destination city for visitors to the area while not addressing the real problems the area faces.  Spending the tax payers’ money to obtain a short-cut to generate revenue, in my view, does not help the average citizen. Spending money for a conference center expansion and aquatic center will not solve the area’s problems.  The aquatic center will not make any difference when one needs a job and there is not one available locally.  By the same token, if a job exists in the area and you need it badly, then the aquatic center does not enter the picture.
  • The area has one of the largest employers (Eastman Chemical) in the state and a major tourist attraction (Bristol Nascar Race).  It appears that the elected leaders have become complacent about finding new good paying jobs because these two businesses have not increased the population and/or stopped the exit of young adults leaving the area.
  • Kingsport is the largest city in Sullivan County and is proud of its reputation for having good schools.  Dobyns-Bennett High School has been named by Newsweek magazine as one of the top high schools in the country.  Having great schools apparently is not enough to keep the young adults from leaving the area in search of good paying jobs.
  • Kingsport has built a Higher Education Center, but I have a concern that there will not be the needed jobs in the area for those who finish their education.  I am for education, but with the large number of students, and with nothing major coming in as far as jobs, many will leave to look elsewhere for jobs.  Increasing the percentage of college graduates in the area is good, but the percentage of college graduates might be skewed because of the number of college educated young people leaving the area and the fact that the large percentage of older folks that do not have higher education.
  • It appears that local cities are striving to get new retail business into the area as an easy way to increase revenue.  Having retail is a quick way to get revenue, but as retail increases in a given city, then the share that retailers gets decreases because they have to share retail sales among many retailers.  I think a better approach would be to increase the flow of money into the area via good paying jobs, which would  provide for longer term stability for these retailers and this will also increase the standard of living for city/county citizens.
  • Because of declining revenues or increased spending, cities in Sullivan County have chosen to annex new areas for the tax revenue, increase their population, and to enable the city to borrow more because of the increased asset value.  This helps the cities, but decreases the already low standard of living for the citizens.
Conclusion

The facts presented above may concern some that bringing out these issues will cause folks or businesses to avoid the North East Tennessee area.  The facts presented above are available to anyone who desires to do research.  I am sure that any large company would do their research before deciding to invest in Sullivan County.  I also feel that “enough is enough” and the issues need to be up-front and center stage to be addressed.  No more hiding the issues….deal with them head on so the region will begin to respond economically. Good paying jobs in my view is what is needed to restore what has been lost.

    There must be lots of jobs and a few hundred will not do.  It should be a broad mix of jobs that would be attractive to different types of workers who have different skills or educational training.
    We need elected officials that will not cater to special interests groups or use get rich quick schemes to get revenue into the local government.  Get the money flowing into the area via good paying jobs and then the region might become attractive to those job seekers. The current and past economic development efforts are not working and efforts need to be stepped up and action is needed now.  If the economic development people are not capable of delivering results, then they need to be replaced.  If local politics are hindering the economic development efforts, then that needs to be exposed and addressed.
    If you are an elected official or economic development person and your views or lack of vision is holding up the region from rebounding, then you need to step aside.
What you can do?
Comments are Welcome

Please feel free to add comments via this blog

Three States vies for Harley-Davidson site

August 21st, 2009 No comments

Now there are three states trying to get a Harley-Davidson motorcycle assembly plant.  It appears that Sullivan County is not in the picture for jobs that could help the declining population, young adults leaving the area, and high employment rate in the Kingsport area.  Where are the Sullivan County economic development people and what are they doing?

Indiana is trying to edge out Kentucky and Tennessee and land a Harley-Davidson motorcycle assembly plant that could employ at least 1,000 workers.

Economic development leaders in Indiana have met with executives of the motorcycle company and touted the state’s pro-business tax climate, a state official confirmed Wednesday.

Read more via State vies for Harley-Davidson site | IndyStar.com | The Indianapolis Star.

The Toxic 100: The Top Corporate Air Polluters in the U.S.

August 13th, 2009 No comments

Eastman Chemical was ranked at 11 as one of the Top Corporate Air Polluters in the U.S.

The Toxic 100 index identifies the top U.S. air polluters among the world’s largest corporations. The index relies on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Risk Screening Environmental Indicators (RSEI) project. The starting point for the RSEI is the EPA’s Toxics Release Inventory (TRI), which reports on releases of toxic chemicals at facilities across the United States. TRI data are widely cited in press stories on “top polluters,” but they have limitations that the Toxic 100 addresses:

Toxic 100 Index (Top 20 are shown below)

Click here for full list

Links on company names lead to detailed company reports.

Rank

Corporation

Toxic score
(pounds released
x toxicity x
population exposure)

Millions of
pounds of toxic
air releases

Millions of
pounds of toxic
incineration transfers

1

E.I. du Pont de Nemours

285,661

12.73

23.00

2

Archer Daniels Midland (ADM)

213,159

12.92

0.00

3

Dow Chemical

189,673

11.12

42.02

4

Bayer Group

172,773

0.72

6.93

5

Eastman Kodak

162,430

2.66

0.36

6

General Electric

149,061

4.14

7.14

7

Arcelor Mittal

134,573

0.94

0.00

8

US Steel

129,123

2.21

0.09

9

ExxonMobil

128,758

12.70

0.39

10

AK Steel Holding

101,428

0.27

0.00

11

Eastman Chemical

98,432

6.98

0.31

12

Duke Energy

93,174

80.21

0.00

13

ConocoPhillips

91,993

6.56

0.01

14

Precision Castparts

87,500

0.09

0.02

15

Alcoa

85,983

13.11

0.15

16

Valero Energy

83,993

4.46

0.14

17

Ford Motor

75,360

6.24

0.00

18

General Motors

73,248

8.37

0.02

19

Goodyear

67,632

3.16

0.00

20

E.ON

65,579

20.96

0.00

Top Tennessee Counties Ranked on Eight Different Criteria

August 2nd, 2009 No comments

Below is a series of ranking tables that compares the top 20 Tennessee counties that had the largest retail sales in 2008.  The top 20 counties listed below had retail sales that were $71,443,928,487 out of a total $90,007,566,528 for all 95 counties.  The entire data set can be viewed for all counties at this link:  2008 Retail Sales

Sullivan County is highlighted because of its declining population, low median wages, and young adults leaving Sullivan County.  The major cities in Sullivan County are Kingsport and Bristol. Sullivan County has one of the largest private employers in the state (Eastman Chemical) and as well as the Bristol Nascar race.

The tables below will  show that there are many counties that are doing much better than Sullivan County without having an Eastman Chemical or the Bristol races.

The problems as I see it have been ongoing for several decades. As an elected leader or involved in economic development, is this something that you are proud of?  This blog will continue to point out the problems and if elected leaders fail to respond to the problems….at least the world will know about Sullivan County.  The bottom line is that the Northeast Tennessee needs good paying jobs!!

Sullivan County has a history of being controlled by Republicans.  It just might be that this may be the problem.  Maybe we need Democratic leadership to get something done.

Also in Table 1 are links for the county websites.  Some county web pages are well done and project a good image for the county and some are rather plain and are lacking in information such as access to public documents (minutes, etc.).  You can be the judge as to which counties have the best website by clicking on the links below in Table 1.

Table 1

County Rank Population
Shelby 1 906,825
Davidson 2 626,144
Knox 3 430,019
Hamilton 4 332,848
Rutherford 5 249,270
Williamson 6 171,452
Sumner 7 155,474
Montgomery 8 154,756
Sullivan 9 153,900
Blount 10 121,511
Washington 11 118,639
Wilson 12 109,803
Bradley 13 96,472
Madison 14 96,376
Sevier 15 84,835
Maury 16 81,938
Anderson 17 74,169
Putnam 18 71,160
Hamblen 19 62,132
Coffee 20 52,134
Table 2

County Rank Median Household Income
Williamson 1 $84,205
Wilson 2 $60,503
Sumner 3 $52,970
Rutherford 4 $50,623
Montgomery 5 $49,248
Blount 6 $46,009
Knox 7 $45,309
Maury 8 $44,990
Davidson 9 $44,486
Hamilton 10 $44,384
Shelby 11 $43,512
Anderson 12 $41,346
Bradley 13 $39,761
Madison 14 $39,721
Sevier 15 $39,534
Washington 16 $39,238
Hamblen 17 $37,661
Sullivan 18 $37,559
Coffee 19 $37,076
Putnam 20 $34,923

The top 20 counties below in Table 3 had retail sales that were  $71,443,928,487 out of $90,007,566,528 for all 95 counties.  The entire data set can be viewed for all counties at this link:  2008 Retail Sales

Nine counties did better than Sullivan County in the Retail Sales per Person column and four of them were in East Tennessee.

Table 3

County Rank Retail Sales 2008
Davidson 1 $13,865,135,945
Shelby 2 $12,865,439,968
Knox 3 $8,693,885,896
Hamilton 4 $5,438,410,222
Rutherford 5 $5,236,379,546
Williamson 6 $3,586,964,710
Sullivan 7 $2,620,209,989
Washington 8 $2,074,933,033
Montgomery 9 $2,023,611,739
Sevier 10 $1,991,799,739
Madison 11 $1,890,155,368
Blount 12 $1,627,066,213
Sumner 13 $1,545,933,314
Putnam 14 $1,325,563,626
Wilson 15 $1,323,786,540
Hamblen 16 $1,322,352,772
Bradley 17 $1,204,829,952
Maury 18 $1,022,426,600
Anderson 19 $990,798,125
Coffee 20 $794,245,190
Table 4

County Rank Retail Sales Per Person
Sevier 1 $23,479
Davidson 2 $22,144
Hamblen 3 $21,283
Rutherford 4 $21,007
Williamson 5 $20,921
Knox 6 $20,217
Madison 7 $19,612
Putnam 8 $18,628
Washington 9 $17,489
Sullivan 10 $17,025
Hamilton 11 $16,339
Coffee 12 $15,235
Shelby 13 $14,187
Blount 14 $13,390
Anderson 15 $13,359
Montgomery 16 $13,076
Bradley 17 $12,489
Maury 18 $12,478
Wilson 19 $12,056
Sumner 20 $9,943

Tables 5 and 6 below show the Estimated Current Property Values for the counties and shows how strong the property taxes are for a county.  The property values below include industrial and commercial, residential, farms, etc.

The property vales used in table 5 were taken from the 2008 Tax Aggregate Report of Tennessee.  The Estimated Current Property Value column in Table 5 includes the county and municipalities property values and are added together for one property value for the county in Table 5.

Williamson and Sevier Counties are clearly the big winners in Table 6. Washington County which does not have an Eastman Chemical but has more Property Value per Person than Sullivan County and is a smaller county in square miles.

In the above Tables 3 and 4, Bradley County rank was 17 for both retail sales and retail sales per person.  In Table 6, Bradley County has a rank of 5 and would indicate a strong manufacturing base.  Also Bradley County will be getting the $1 billion Wacker Chemie AG plant which will employ 500 – 600 people.

Hemlock Semiconductor Corp.,  plans to build a $1.2 billion facility near Clarksville (Montgomery County). That project is expected to open in 2012 and create 800 jobs.

Volkswagen plans to employ about 2,000 workers and invest about $1 billion in Chattanooga.

Eastman Chemical and the Bristol Nascar Races have been good for Sullivan County, but in my opinion the county, Kingsport, and Bristol have relied on it for far too long and have become complacent when it comes to economic development.

Table 5

County Rank Estimated
Current
Property Value
Shelby 1 $122,116,400,578
Davidson 2 $105,301,418,705
Williamson 3 $55,812,256,667
Knox 4 $45,660,993,815
Hamilton 5 $44,738,981,752
Rutherford 6 $32,255,317,944
Sumner 7 $24,112,350,451
Sevier 8 $21,230,869,507
Sullivan 9 $18,976,725,006
Montgomery 10 $16,958,166,077
Blount 11 $16,469,522,914
Washington 12 $15,481,178,675
Bradley 14 $14,101,364,762
Wilson 13 $14,101,364,762
Madison 15 $11,024,153,912
Maury 16 $9,291,004,712
Anderson 17 $8,804,923,113
Putnam 18 $7,450,597,543
Hamblen 19 $7,328,642,509
Coffee 20 $5,428,259,549
Table 6

County Rank Property Value Per Person
Williamson 1 $325,527
Sevier 2 $250,260
Davidson 3 $168,174
Sumner 4 $155,089
Bradley 5 $146,170
Blount 6 $135,539
Shelby 7 $134,663
Hamilton 8 $134,412
Washington 9 $130,489
Rutherford 10 $129,399
Wilson 11 $128,424
Sullivan 12 $123,305
Anderson 13 $118,714
Hamblen 14 $117,952
Madison 15 $114,386
Maury 16 $113,390
Montgomery 17 $109,580
Knox 18 $106,183
Putnam 19 $104,702
Coffee 20 $104,121

Sullivan County in Table 7 has the worst rank of the top 2 retail sales counties for population growth.  Over an eight year period from years 2000 to 2008, Sullivan County only gained 850 in population.

Sullivan County death rate is higher than the birth rate and the county gained only 850 in population in the time span of 2000 to 2008.  The gain has come from new arrivals to the area.

Sullivan County is considered one of the larger populated counties in Tennessee.  In 1994, Sullivan County was the fifth most populated county.  Because of the growth in other counties and the declining population in Sullivan County, the rank of Sullivan County is estimated to be 11 in year 2030

Table 7

County Rank Population % Change, 2000 to 2008
Rutherford 1 39.94%
Williamson 2 36.94%
Wilson 3 23.64%
Sevier 4 19.20%
Sumner 5 19.18%
Maury 6 17.90%
Montgomery 7 14.83%
Blount 8 14.82%
Putnam 9 14.20%
Knox 10 12.56%
Washington 11 10.67%
Davidson 12 9.87%
Bradley 13 9.67%
Coffee 14 8.58%
Hamilton 15 8.10%
Hamblen 16 6.89%
Madison 17 4.94%
Anderson 18 3.98%
Shelby 19 1.04%
Sullivan 20 0.56%
Table 8

County Land Area Sq Miles Rank Persons Per Sq Mile
Davidson 502 1 1247
Shelby 755 2 1201
Knox 508 3 846
Hamilton 542 4 614
Rutherford 619 5 403
Hamblen 161 6 386
Sullivan 413 7 373
Washington 326 8 364
Williamson 583 9 294
Sumner 529 10 294
Bradley 329 11 293
Montgomery 539 12 287
Anderson 338 13 219
Blount 559 14 217
Wilson 571 15 192
Putnam 401 16 177
Madison 557 17 173
Sevier 592 18 143
Maury 613 19 134
Coffee 429 20 122

All data used in the above tables are from the links highlighted above in blue.