No WhiteWash!

Below is a 2007 Average Annual Wage by Major Industry comparison for Sullivan County and Tennessee.  The graph below is from the State of Tennessee and shows the average wages if you were employed.  The unemployment rate for June 2009 was 12.7 percent for Kingsport

Median household income (in 2007 inflation-adjusted dollars)

• Kingsport $34,391
• Bristol $36,374
• Sullivan County $37,559
• Tennessee $41,821

  

Manufacturing is the winner in the above graph, but Vice Mayor Ben Mallicote in his election debates made some statements that appears that he was anti-smokestack business.  See the short clip below.

Kingsport has led the Tri-Cites area with the highest unemployment rate of 11.8 percent for January, 2010.  For well over a year, Kingsport has been running a higher unemployment rate which cannot be blamed solely on Eastman.

It is important to note that this 11.8 percent unemployment rate for Kingsport is not a true indicator of the actual unemployment rate.  The rate does not reflect those who have given up trying to find a job or those who work as a contractor.

The sad news is that as these unemployed folks look for employment to support their families, they may be forced to move out of Kingsport to take jobs elsewhere.

---

Household Median Income for Tennessee Counties

Below is the household median income for the top 20 Tennessee Counties that had the largest retail sales. The household median income is for the county and may be different for cities within the county. Below is the household median Income for Sullivan County cities

Kingsport $34,391 – Individuals below poverty level 18.0%

Bristol $36,454 – Individuals below poverty level 14.6%

Sullivan County – Individuals below poverty level 15.8%

County	Rank	Household Median Income
Williamson	1	$84,205
Wilson	2	$60,503
Sumner	3	$52,970
Rutherford	4	$50,623
Montgomery	5	$49,248
Blount	6	$46,009
Knox	7	$45,309
Maury	8	$44,990
Davidson	9	$44,486
Hamilton	10	$44,384
Shelby	11	$43,512
Anderson	12	$41,346
Bradley	13	$39,761
Madison	14	$39,721
Sevier	15	$39,534
Washington	16	$39,238
Hamblen	17	$37,661
Sullivan	18	$37,559
Coffee	19	$37,076
Putnam	20	$34,923

Below is the household income distribution for Kingsport and the household median income for Kingsport is $34,391. In the graph below there are 2,636 people who are living in poverty.

The 2009 Poverty Guidelines for the 48 Contiguous States and the District of Columbia
Persons in family	Poverty guideline
1	$10,830
2	$14,570
3	$18,310
4	$22,050
5	$25,790
6	$29,530
7	$33,270
8	$37,010
For families with more than 8 persons, add $3,740 for each additional person.

---

Sullivan County Average Annual Wage by Major Industry

Below is a 2007 Average Annual Wage by Major Industry comparison for Sullivan County and Tennessee.  The graph below is from the State of Tennessee and shows the average wages if you were employed.  The unemployment rate for June 2009 was 12.7 percent for Kingsport

Median household income (in 2007 inflation-adjusted dollars)

• Kingsport $34,391
• Bristol $36,374
• Sullivan County $37,559
• Tennessee $41,821

  

King College, a denominational college located in Bristol, Tennessee, has been in discussions with Kingsport, Bristol, and Sullivan County officials to build a medical school in Kingsport and Bristol.

The cost for the medical school would be about $150 million.  King is looking for $50 million to come from the cities of Kingsport ($40 million) and Bristol ($10 million), $50 million from the State of Tennessee, and the remaining $50 million from private donations.

At the July 7, 2009, Kingsport, Tennessee Board of Mayor and Alderman, a resolution was passed on first reading to endorse the King College Medical School Initiative, and pledged its commitment to work with Bristol, Sullivan County, and King College to advance the project.

While it does sound like a good project for the area, there will be a major impact on the taxpayers if this is funded via a property tax increase.

Mayor Dennis Phillips has stated that if Kingsport were to fund $40 million for the project, property taxes would have to be raised 25 cents.

Below are tax rates that have been extracted from the Tennessee Property Tax Rates that show the top 20 cities that have the highest tax rates in Tennessee from 406 different tax rates for the different cities and counties.

I have added 25 cents to the tax rates for the two Kingsport line items (Kingsport-Sullivan and Kingsport-Hawkins) in the table below.  Kingsport, with the 25 cents added, would have a rank of 10 and 12 as having the most expensive tax rates in the state.  Bristol has a rank of 14 and I have no knowledge if they would increase property taxes.

Top 20 Cities with the most expensive property tax rates

R a n k	County	City	Total County and City Tax	Property Tax for $150k Home	Household Median Income	% Taxes from Household Income	Median Home Value
1	SHELBY	MEMPHIS	$7.29	$2,734	$32,285	8.47%	$130,695
2	SHELBY	GERMANTOWN	$5.63	$2,111	$113,733	1.86%	$278,800
3	SHELBY	BARTLETT	$5.63	$2,111	$74,091	2.85%	$164,600
4	KNOX	KNOXVILLE	$5.50	$2,063	$32,538	6.34%	$102,300
5	ANDERSON	OAK RIDGE	$5.45	$2,044	$45,474	4.49%	$120,100
6	SHELBY	COLLIERVILLE	$5.37	$2,014	$99,239	2.03%	$255,400
7	HAMILTON	CHATTANOOGA	$5.36	$2,009	$35,913	5.59%	$121,100
8	SHELBY	MILLINGTON	$5.32	$1,995	$43,753	4.56%	$124,144
9	MADISON	HUMBOLDT	$5.30	$1,988	$50,007	3.98%	$181,800
10	HAWKINS	KINGSPORT	$5.11*	$1,916	$34,391	5.57%	$99,900
11	SHELBY	ARLINGTON	$5.09	$1,909	$59,131	3.23%	$233,597
12	SULLIVAN	KINGSPORT	$5.08*	$1,905	$34,391	5.54%	$99,900
13	ROANE	OAK RIDGE	$5.04	$1,890	$45,474	4.16%	$120,100
14	SULLIVAN	BRISTOL	$5.03	$1,886	$36,454	5.17%	$94,000
15	MORGAN	OAKDALE	$4.98	$1,868	$32,174	5.81%	$47,502
16	COFFEE	MANCHESTER	$4.96	$1,860	$36,674	5.07%	$112,275
17	HAMILTON	LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN	$4.95	$1,858	$117,767	1.58%	$515,354
18	HAMILTON	RIDGESIDE	$4.95	$1,858	$103,995	1.79%	$293,387
19	LAUDERDALE	HENNING	$4.95	$1,856	$23,407	7.93%	$65,212
20	HAMILTON	SIGNAL MOUNTAIN	$4.93	$1,848	$78,175	2.36%	$283,948

* The current city and county combined tax rate for Kingsport-Sullivan County is $4.86 and Kingsport-Hawkins County is $4.86.  Twenty-five cents has been added to each of the Kingsport tax rates in the above table.

---

The table below again shows the top 20 cites and the effect on the taxpayers’ Household Median Income.  There appears to be a disconnect with those cities having a high tax rate, lower Household Median Income and the percentage of Household Income needed to pay property taxes.

The household median income for Kingsport is $34,391 and the Kingsport majority of Kingsport property owners would pay over 5.5 percent of household income ($150k home) for property taxes if  the 25 cents is added to the Kingsport tax rate.  The Kingsport rank is 6 and 7 and Bristol comes in at a rank of 8 in the table below for the largest percent of household income needed to pay property taxes.

A taxpayer funded medical school would reduce the already low Kingsport household income and would reduce the standard of living for the majority of Kingsport citizens so the city could reap the benefits of increased revenue to spend on other pet projects.

Top 20 Cities that take the highest percentage of income for property taxes

R a n k	County	City	Total County and City Tax	Property Tax for $150k Home	Household Median Income	% Taxes from Household Income	Median Home Value
1	SHELBY	MEMPHIS	$7.29	$2,734	$32,285	8.47%	$130,695
2	LAUDERDALE	HENNING	$4.95	$1,856	$23,407	7.93%	$65,212
3	KNOX	KNOXVILLE	$5.50	$2,063	$32,538	6.34%	$102,300
4	MORGAN	OAKDALE	$4.98	$1,868	$32,174	5.81%	$47,502
5	HAMILTON	CHATTANOOGA	$5.36	$2,009	$35,913	5.59%	$121,100
6	HAWKINS	KINGSPORT	$5.11*	$1,916	$34,391	5.57%	$99,900
7	SULLIVAN	KINGSPORT	$5.08*	$1,905	$34,391	5.54%	$99,900
8	SULLIVAN	BRISTOL	$5.03	$1,886	$36,454	5.17%	$94,000
9	COFFEE	MANCHESTER	$4.96	$1,860	$36,674	5.07%	$112,275
10	SHELBY	MILLINGTON	$5.32	$1,995	$43,753	4.56%	$124,144
11	ANDERSON	OAK RIDGE	$5.45	$2,044	$45,474	4.49%	$120,100
12	ROANE	OAK RIDGE	$5.04	$1,890	$45,474	4.16%	$120,100
13	MADISON	HUMBOLDT	$5.30	$1,988	$50,007	3.98%	$181,800
14	SHELBY	ARLINGTON	$5.09	$1,909	$59,131	3.23%	$233,597
15	SHELBY	BARTLETT	$5.63	$2,111	$74,091	2.85%	$164,600
16	HAMILTON	SIGNAL MOUNTAIN	$4.93	$1,848	$78,175	2.36%	$283,948
17	SHELBY	COLLIERVILLE	$5.37	$2,014	$99,239	2.03%	$255,400
18	SHELBY	GERMANTOWN	$5.63	$2,111	$113,733	1.86%	$278,800
19	HAMILTON	RIDGESIDE	$4.95	$1,858	$103,995	1.79%	$293,387
20	HAMILTON	LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN	$4.95	$1,858	$117,767	1.58%	$515,354

* The current city and county combined tax rate for Kingsport-Sullivan County is $4.86 and Kingsport-Hawkins County is $4.86.  Twenty-five cents has been added to each of the Kingsport tax rates in the above table.

---

I have heard some members of the Kingsport BMA express their desire to have a college located in Kingsport.  They should keep in mind that there are very large number of cities that have been successful without having a college and who also have a better standard of living than Kingsport.

College Cities	Household Median Income
Knoxville	$32,538
Bristol	$36,454
Chattanooga	$35,913
Johnson City	$35,746
Memphis	$35,181

The above cities that have a college appear not to have increased the standard of living and have a low household median income.

Below is the household income distribution for Kingsport and the household median income for Kingsport is $34,391.  In the graph below there are 2,636 people who earn less than $10,000  classifying them as living in poverty.

I challenge the elected officials to venture outside of their social and political groups and try to understand the plight of the majority of wage earners in the Kingsport area.  The medical school would bring jobs, but some of these jobs will be imported jobs and the common folks would not have the background or training for these jobs.  Ask what you can do to raise the standard of living (higher income) for Kingsport citizens without imposing a property tax burden.

I feel that the taxpayers should not be taking the risk of funding a medical school when there already is a state funded one in Johnson City.  The need for doctors in this area is questionable since the population is declining in Sullivan County.  If they area has trouble attracting doctors or keeping doctors, then take a hard look at the reason.

Quality of Life issues are important, but a good Standard of Living for local folks just might make the area prosper by increased spending by the majority of citizens.

The bottom line is that the area needs good paying jobs without the additional burden on the taxpayers.

I need to point out that no funding has been voted on so far, but projects such as this grows legs very fast and then its then to late to react.  The intent of this post is to make you aware of the issues so you can make your views know.  Update:  Many elected officials have expressed their support of this project including Lt. Governor Ron Ramsey who may make it a part of his campaign for governor.  Again, I must point out that I am not against the project but am very concerned about it being funded by taxpayers.

Please contact your elected officials and tell them NO to a taxpayer funded denominational medical school.  Click on the email links below and add your comments in your own email program.

email Kingsport BMA -  Mayor Dennis Phillips -  Vice Mayor Ben Mallicote -  Alderman Larry Munsey -  Alderman Jantry Shupe -  Alderwoman Valerie Joh -  Alderman Ken Marsh, Jr. -  Alderman Tom Parham	email Tennessee Legislators for area -  Lt. Governor Ron Ramsey -  Senator Mike Faulk -  Rep. Jason E. Mumpower -  Rep. Tony Shipley -  Rep. Jon Lundberg -  Rep. Dale Ford
email Sullivan County Commissioners See list for -  Commissioners individual emails or -  email Mayor and all Sullivan County Commissioners	email this post to a friend
email Candidates for Tennessee Governor -  Mike McWherter -  Roy Herron -  Ward Cammack -  Zack Wamp -  Bill Haslam -  Ron Ramsey -  Kim McMillan -  Jim Kyle

Below is a video from the KNETIC debate, that shows two different perspectives on economic development between Pat Shull and Ben Mallicote, who are both running for re-election for the Kingsport Board of Mayor and Alderman.

Ben Mallicote stated in the KNETIC debate that Cincinnati, Ohio is not recruiting businesses and instead recruiting people.  Read the Cincinnati 2009-2013 Work Plan at the bottom of this post and decide yourself if the statement that Ben Mallicote made concerning Cincinnati is a true statement.  Also click on the links below and I think you will see that Cincinnati has a lot going on concerning economic development.

He appears to be anti-smokestack type businesses, but I should remind Ben Mallicote, that the patents that he talks about most likely came from those companies like Eastman that have smokestacks.

Cincinnati also states the following.

Each new company that locates here fortifies the entire region. Research shows that one new company bringing 50 new jobs will create 51 additional jobs in other industries, generating $4.1 million in wages and salaries for the total 101 jobs. This triggers an estimated 67 new housing units with $6.8 million in sales and, subsequently, $2.6 million spent on food, clothing, vehicle, entertainment and other goods purchased. One company. 50 new jobs. Significant regional impact for everyone.

2008 Annual Report

2008 Regional Business Growth Report

2008 Regional Business Retention Report

City of Cincinnati

Below is page 16 from the 2008 Annual Report

It will interesting to see what pet projects, the Kingsport Board of Mayor and Alderman will fund in the upcoming 2009-2010 budget.

There has been discussions concerning the funding of the Summer Concert.  The Chamber of Commerce has requested $94,000 because corporate donations are down.  The city appears that they would be willing to give $70,000 which is what they gave last year.

It appears that the citizens of Kingsport in these tough economic times, will have to fund the Summer Concerts that for the most part benefit the downtown businesses.  I think you would hear downtown businesses get very vocal if the Summer Concerts were held somewhere else besides downtown.  If they want the Summer Concerts, then they should fund it.

One also needs to look at how the KNETIC organization was able to get the concessions and beer sales for the Summer Concerts.  In the past years, it was handled by the Chamber of Commerce who subcontracted to the Downtown Kingsport Association.  On the KNETIC website, they state their members ages ranges from 20 somethings to 40 somethings and they boast that they have 2 Alderman as members.  There are only two Alderman’s ages that fit that age range and only one of the two is running for re-election as an Alderman.  Also, one needs to ask are there any family members of Mayor Dennis Phillips that are connected to KNETIC.

Alderman Pat Shull has stated that the funding of the concerts is a very narrow interest type thing and the $70,000 could be spent elsewhere like fixing streets.

Below are some items that were in the 2008-2009 budget.

• Kingsport Ballet $5,000
• Summer Concert  $70,000
• Kingsport Theatre Guild  $5,000
• Kingsport Art Guild  $2,000
• Symphony of the Mountains  $5,000
• Art Council of Greater Kingsport  $7,000
• Kingsport Housing Redevelopment Authority  – Lincoln Street property  $200,000
• Kingsport Housing Redevelopment Authority – redevelopment program  $63,000
• Kingsport Chamber Foundation  $110,000
• Kingsport Tomorrow Inc community program  $23,000
• Networks  $225,000
• Downtown Kingsport Association  $40,000
• Children Advocacy Center of Sullivan County $5,900
• First Tennessee Development District  $3,200
• Sullivan County Humane Society  $36,000
• First Tennessee Resource Agency  $10,900
• Kingsport Chamber of Commerce – Move to Kingsport $45,000.  Plus Kingsport will pay another $45,000 matching funds
• Holston Business Group  $50,000.  Plus a percentage of the city annual budget.
• Kingsport Chamber of Commerce gets a large percentage of the hotel tax
• City Manager got a 4% pay raise on July 1, 2008 plus his performance increase

I must admit that the decision of the Kingsport BMA to spend over $15 million for an expansion of the MeadowView Convention Center has really raised my blood pressure.

I have written many posts concerning this issue and feel that politics is playing a big part in the decision to expand the convention center.  Good common business sense seems to be absent for the five BMA members (Phillips, Mallicote, Joh, Shupe, Munsey) who voted to expand the convention center.  It appears that there is an incestuous relationship with special interest groups

Alderman Marsh implored the mayor to get public input before the vote, but the mayor railroaded the convention center expansion to a vote.  Alderman Marsh and Shull voted to give back to the city property owners the 1/4 percent regional sales tax that was used to pay off the current convention center, but the gang of five prevailed.

The taxpayers have invested $25.7 million in the current MeadowView Convention Center and Cattails golf course.  The convention center has never made money and the golf course barely breaks even.

The City of Kingsport is spending another $15 million to expand the convention center into an executive conference center.

One needs to ask, what is the real cost to the taxpayers for Kingsport’s part of MeadowView? The combined cost of the current convention center, golf course and the new expansion would be about $41 million.

To get the true cost, the interest expense for the bonds must be added to the cost.  In the table below you will see the actual cost after applying the different interest rates.  The bond life used is 20 years.

Cost	Interest Expense	Real Cost	Interest Rate
41,000,000	18,628,464	59,628,464	4.00%
41,000,000	17,340,210	58,340,210	3.75%
41,000,000	16,068,036	57,068,036	3.50%

I would like to ask, are there any citizens in Kingsport that would invest $57 – $59.6 million in a project that did not make money for them?

It is up to you as voters to decide your future.  Mallicote, Joh, and Phillips who are running for re-election voted to spend more money on the money-losing convention center.

Alderman Shull who is also running for re-election voted against the convention center expansion and instead voted to give the regional sales tax back to city property owners.

I must warn you to beware of the spin that the city officials have been putting out concerning MeadowView.  If MeadowView has been that great for Kingsport, then why do we have a declining population, negative retail growth after inflation, and the highest unemployment rate in the Tri-Cities area.  You decide…see data

Ben Mallicote stated in the Rotary Club debate that he was humbled to serve as Vice Mayor of Kingsport.  Well, that is what he would like for you to believe.

The real story is that Ben Mallicote thought so much of himself that he nominated himself to be Vice Mayor and Mayor Phillips cast the deciding vote to break the tie.

I know of only one vote that Ben Mallicote has voted differently from Mayor Phillips.  He has stated in the past that Mayor Phillips is like a 2nd father to him.

Ben Mallicote would like for people to think he is an independent voice on the BMA.  But, with the exception on one vote that I am aware of, he votes the same as Mayor Phillips.  That is what Mayor Phillips wants, he gets!

Those city residents that go to the BMA meetings or watch on TV have more than likely observed the abrasive nature of Mr. Mallicote’s comments when other BMA members present a different viewpoint.  On this blog I have used the words “attack”, “anger”, “hissy fit” in describing the comments coming from Mr. Mallicote.  It is interesting to note that I have not seen any “hissy fits” coming from Ben Mallicote while he is running for re-election.

Clearly, Ben Mallicote has earned the title of “Tax, Borrow, and Spend” specialist by his voting record.

Below are the July 3, 2007 Regular Business Meeting Minutes for the Vice Mayor vote.

III.A SWEARING-IN ELECTED BOARD MEMBER OFFICIALS. City Recorder Jim Demming swore in the re-elected Mayor Dennis R. Phillips (joined by his wife and son), along with re-elected Alderman Larry A. Munsey (joined by his wife) and newly elected Alderman, Jantry Shupe (whose mother was in the audience). Alderman Marsh was not present and chose to be sworn in at the next business meeting rather than telephonically.

III.B ROLL CALL: By City Recorder Demming. Aldermen Marsh and Shull joined the meeting telephonically at this time.

III.C SELECTION OF VICE-MAYOR. Mayor opened the floor for nominations for vice-mayor. Mr. Marsh moved to postpone this action for two weeks in light of the physical absence of himself and Aldermen Shull, who seconded the motion. Mayor Phillip read from the City Charter stating that selection is required to be made at the first meeting in July, following an election and City Attorney Billingsley confirmed. Alderman Shull nominated Mr. Marsh, if the action is not deferrable. City Attorney Billingsley stated that no second is necessary. Alderman Mallicote offered his services as vice-mayor and Alderman Marsh moved that nominations cease, with Alderman Shull seconding. Board discussion followed whether to limit the nominations.

A vote was taken regarding ceasing nominations and failed, with Joh, Shull and Marsh voted “aye” and Mallicote, Munsey, Shupe and Phillips voting “nay.”

City Attorney Billingsley clarified that the roll call vote for vice-mayor required a majority vote; namely, four votes for one candidate.

Alderman Shupe nominated Mr. Munsey who indicated he was willing to continue as vice-mayor. Mayor Phillips announced the three vice-mayor candidates would be voted on by each Board member stating the name of the candidate for whom they were voting as a roll call vote was taken. A three-way tie resulted as follows:

Joh and Mallicote: Mallicote

Marsh and Shull: Marsh

Munsey and Shupe: Munsey

Mayor Phillips did not vote because no candidate would receive a majority vote. At this point, the mayor asked the three candidates to give a brief synopsis of why each would like to serve as vice-mayor and what each would bring to the board in that position. Another roll call vote was taken and resulted in a majority vote for Mr. Mallicote as follows:

Joh – Mallicote

Mallicote – Mallicote

Marsh – Marsh

Munsey – Munsey

Shull – Marsh

Shupe – Mallicote

Phillips – Mallicote

Mayor Phillips stated his appreciation for Mr. Munsey serving the Board extremely well as vice-mayor and has enjoyed working with him immensely and will continue to do so in his service as alderman. The mayor added that he would like to see the BMA devise a less divisive process for selecting a vice-mayor and would like to discuss improving the procedure further at the Board’s retreat.

Ben Mallicote seems to be in a tight spot in this election over his vote to refuse to give the regional sales tax back to the citizens via a property tax deduction after it had served its purpose.  Alderman Marsh and Alderman Shull voted to give the tax back to the citizens.

I had a chance to watch the video of the Rotary Club debate on cable channel 16 and it was very clear to me that he was trying to justify his vote on the regional sales tax issue.  Mr. Mallicote, why didn’t you not at the time of your vote bring up the same reasons as you did in the Rotary Club debate.

Alderman candidates debate what’s best for city at Kingsport Rotary Club

Kingsport Times-News

Mallicote, also first elected to the BMA four years ago, said you couldn’t consider Shull’s suggestion without considering the cost and trade-off.

“In the midst of this great housing crisis, Kingsport is third in the nation in home price appreciation. When other municipalities are seeing double-digit drops in sales tax collections, Kingsport is seeing double-digit increases,” Mallicote said. “Without the investment this board has made, we wouldn’t have Target, the new Food City, East Stone Commons, all of the new residential options, the higher education and allied health facilities, the revitalization of downtown, the new concert series, and a nationally recognized school system.

Mr. Mallicote mentions double-digit sales tax collections, but I doubt he can back up that statement with data.  See previous post that debunks this statement.  I am sure that Pat Shull is is thankful that Mallicote mentioned all of the other investments that Pat Shull voted for.

Mr. Mallicote again I feel is on the defensive in the radio interview on WJCW on April 23 concerning the regional sales tax.

Could it be that Mallicote does not have the security of the other four members of the Gang of Five to help him defend his vote?   Phillips,Joh,Shupe, and Munsey also voted against giving the regional sales tax back to the property owners.

The October 21, 2008 BMA meeting got a little heated with Vice Mayor Ben Mallicote going on the attack when Marsh and Shull attempted to state their views in a business like way.

See the November 11, 2008 post below for more information.

Click on the More Info button for all posts that discuss  Ben Mallicote

---

Kingsport, Tennessee BMA refuses to rescind Regional Sales Tax after it had served it’s purpose

Alderman Marsh presented a resolution at the October 21, 2008 Kingsport Board of Mayors and Aldermen to eliminate the quarter percent sales tax that voters approved in 1992 to fund the Meadowview Convention Center.  The quarter percent regional sales tax had served it’s purpose and the convention center debt was paid off in 2008.

The resolution was to use a portion of the regional sales tax to reduce the property tax rate for citizens. The citizens of Kingsport could have received a reduction in their city property tax, but the resolution was quickly voted down by the “gang of five”. (Mayor Dennis Phillips, Vice Mayor Mallicote, and Aldermen Munsey, Joh, Shupe)  See Kingsport Times-News article  “Marsh urges scuttling MeadowView expansion

The decision of the “gang of five” showed their true colors by voting against the citizens for a property tax refund and instead voting for special interest groups.

Alderman Shull and Marsh have in the past tried to discuss the future of the regional sales tax, but Mayor Phillips would always table the discussion.  It is my feeling that Mayor Phillips had no intention of ending the regional sales tax and had plans to use it for MeadowView Convention Center expansion.

The October 21, 2008 BMA meeting got a little heated with Vice Mayor Ben Mallicote going on the attack, Alderman Joh stated that Aldermen Shull and Marsh were just sore losers.  Mayor Phillips stated that without MeadowView the city would have to raise taxes.  He also made a statement that MeadowView is needed to keep from reducing police and fire protection and doing trash pick-up every two weeks. Mr. Mayor, stop the spin, it may be news to you, the convention center has been operating at a loss and the taxpayers are in fact keeping the convention center in business.  The voters of Kingsport are smarter than you think, Mayor Phillips.

Maybe, I will in the future do a post about the wasteful spending in the City of Kingsport by Mayor Phillips and his gang.

Famous Quotes from the Kingsport Board of Mayor and Aldermen

Mayor Dennis Phillips – ‘We need MeadowView to keep from reducing fire, police protection, and reducing trash pick-up to every two weeks.” October 21, 2008

Mayor Dennis Phillips –“We need to annex so we don’t have to raise taxes”  February 5, 2008

Alderman Munsey – “We need to do the MeadowView expansion to keep from raising taxes” September 15, 2008

Alderman Munsey – Debt is neither good or bad,”   June 3, 2008

Vice Mayor Mallicote – “I do not believe all of the doom and gloom about the economy”.  June 3, 2008

Mayor Dennis Phillips – “If the taxpayers wanted the city to cut the spending, then we could collect garbage every other week”  June 3, 2008

Mayor Dennis Phillips – “If there were no money to spend, then you would not need politicians”  October, 2007

On September 16, 2008, the Kingsport, Tennessee Board of Mayor and Aldermen voted to spend $819,000 for an architect to design the $15 million expansion at the Meadowview Conference Resort and Convent Center.  This was brought quickly to a vote without much detailed discussion or input from the public.  There were discussions on using the regional sales tax to fund the convention center expansion.

Again, this vote was another example of railroading a vote.  Alderman Marsh expressed concern that this was voted on within 24 hours and that there had not been ample time to study the the financial numbers.  He also asked what is in it for the citizens of Kingsport.  He said that this is more for the special interests of certain people.  He attempted to defer the vote to the latter part of October, but Alderman Marsh’s and Alderman Shull’s votes were not enough to postpone the vote.

Simply put, this is an example of the City of Kingsport catering to special interest groups and there seems to be no value to the citizens of Kingsport.  See posts Kingsport, Tennessee incestuous relationship with special interest groups, Convention Center issues plague cities, and More hissy fits in Kingsport, Tennessee Board of Mayor and Aldermen for more background information.

What are you views on the action of the BMA to not give back to the taxpayers the regional sales tax?  Leave a comment.

A concern that I and many others have  is the current balance of power on the Kingsport Board of Mayor and Aldermen.  For example, the five members below very nearly vote the same.  This means that if Mayor Phillips wants something, he almost always gets it.

Mayor Dennis Phillips *	Vice Mayor Ben Mallicote *	Alderman Larry Munsey	Alderman Valerie Joh *	Alderman Jantry Shupe

Alderman Shull and Alderman Marsh have shown the most restraint in spending the taxpayers money.  Aldermen Shull and Marsh do vote for worthwhile projects such as the Higher Education Center, but draw the line on certain issues such as funding the MeadowView Conference Center Expansion ($15 million).

They voted to give the 1/4 percent regional sales tax back to the citizens because the current Convention Center has been paid off.  They lost the vote because of the gang of five above.

Aldermen Shull and Marsh both were in support of the V.O. Dobbins renovations, but withdrew that support when the project expanded putting the City of Kingsport in direct competition with the private sector as a landlord leasing space to non-profits.  They also had a problem with the citizens’ tax dollars being used to subsidize the non-profit organizations.

They both have shown restraint in their discussions and votes when it comes to bigger budgets and bigger government.

Alderman C. Ken Marsh, Jr.	Alderman Pat Shull *

The three new Aldermen candidates below have stated that they agree with what the BMA has done in the past and they appear to be more like the gang of five.  Since we know what Mallicote and Joh have done in the past, there might be an advantage to elect two of the new candidates below to replace Mallicote and Joh.  Re-electing Pat Shull in my view is needed to have some form of check and balance on the BMA.

I fear that if Shull is not re-elected, then a blank check will be given to city government to do as they please when it comes to spending and new city budgets.

	No Photo	No Photo
Thomas Parham	Wade M. McClellan	Mike McIntire

* Term expires June 30, 2009

Ben Mallicote, who is running for re-election as a Kingsport Alderman made the following statement at a recent Rotary Club Debate that was moderated by candidate Dennis Phillips who is running for re-election as mayor.

“When other municipalities are seeing double-digit drops in sales tax collections, Kingsport is seeing double-digit increases,” Mallicote said.

I would like to suggest to Mr. Mallicote that he become more familiar with the city’s finances before making such a statement.  Take a look at the data below and one can see that Kingsport has not seen double-digit increases in sales tax collections.

The retail sales data is from the following link.  Tri-Cities Retail Sales Report

Using the Kingsport retail sales dollars and applying the yearly inflation percent tells a different story.  Note the “% Growth after Inflation” column below in orange tells a different story.  The year 2003 had a positive growth of 2.53% after inflation was applied.

One can say that the retail sales for Kingsport in 2001 actually meant more for the city in buying power than the current retail sales numbers.

The graph below needs no explaining and one can see that Kingsport is not as progressive as we are led to believe.

Click on the More Info button for all posts that discuss Ben Mallicote