Archive

Archive for the ‘Sullivan County’ Category

The Kiplinger Study Kingsport Area Elected Officials Would Like to Keep Quiet

August 3rd, 2010 1 comment

imageKiplinger’s Personal Finance recently published a list of Best Cities for the Next Decade.

Learn more about how they picked the Best Cities for the Next Decade.

Also they published a list  367 U.S. metropolitan areas that can be sorted and ranked by different criteria.

In the example below, all metro areas in Tennessee have been extracted.  The table below was sorted by median household income.  We see that the Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA has the lowest median household income for the Tennessee metro areas ranked and also has a higher cost of living than the other Tennessee metro areas listed below.

Furthermore, Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA median household income rank is 353 out of a total of 367 U.S. metro areas.  This shows that there were 14 metro areas that had a lower median household income than the Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA metro area.

Click here for the entire list of 367 metro areas.  The list can be sorted online or downloaded in spreadsheet format.

I am sure that our local City, County, and State elected officials will want to keep this data from getting out.

RankMetro AreaPopulationCost of Living IndexPercentage of Workforce in Creative ClassMedian Household IncomeSalary GrowthEmployment Growth
120Nashville-Davidson–Murfreesboro, TN1,518,97188.732.7$49,9793.22%2.52%
214Clarksville, TN-KY258,50888.7824.4$44,5313.55%0.97%
216Knoxville, TN680,44489.3326.9$44,5113.23%0.69%
218Memphis, TN-MS-AR1,278,63486.7537.5$44,4952.64%1.17%
253Chattanooga, TN-GA512,32788.6626.7$42,8012.75%0.61%
324Cleveland, TN110,79291.2127.7$38,6053.14%0.80%
329Jackson, TN112,35790.5224.6$38,3526.05%4.25%
337Morristown, TN134,02688.89n/a$37,3681.48%-0.38%
342Johnson City, TN193,45788.8330.2$36,8532.07%1.85%
353Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA302,99710030.9$36,0173.05%0.81%

Sullivan County, TN Highway Employees Indicted

July 21st, 2010 No comments

Alen Pope Dave Campbell Nashville, TN- The Tennessee Bureau of Investigation today arrested the Sullivan County Highway Commissioner and Department Section Foreman on multiple charges after they were indicted by the Sullivan County Grand Jury yesterday.

Sullivan County Highway Commissioner Allan Pope (left picture), 60, 3273 Ridgeview, Kingsport, TN was indicted on seven counts in five separate cases. Charges include one count of theft over $10,000, four counts of theft over $1,000, one count of official misconduct and one count of private use of county equipment.

Sullivan County Highway Department Section Foreman David Campbell (right picture), 60, 244 Clearbranch Circle, Blountville, TN was indicted on eight counts in six separate cases. The charges against him include one count of theft over $10,000, four counts of theft over $1,000, two counts of official misconduct and one count of private use of county equipment.

While working for the county highway department, both Pope and Campbell had work performed on several different private properties at the county’s expense. The incidents occurred at various times as early as November 2006 through March of 2010. Services diverted included performing improvements to real property, filling in a water line ditch and providing a truck load of free gravel. The work was performed at various locations along Graybeal Road, Muddy Creek Road/Brown Circle, Hawley Road, Rice Cross Road and Brookley Drive. The TBI open the case in March of 2010 at the request of the District Attorney General.

Both Pope and Campbell were booked into the Sullivan County Jail on $10,000 bond each.

See the following links for more information.

Best Schools for Your Housing Buck

April 21st, 2010 No comments

image Bristol, Tennessee made the top ten list for the “Best Schools for Your Housing Buck” for median home prices under $100,000.

See the links below for more information on other cities.

List Reveals Parents Can Find High Quality Schools in Cities and Towns With Homes They Can Afford

GreatSchools (www.greatschools.org), the leading source of information for school performance, and Forbes.com (www.Forbes.com), home page for the world’s business leaders, have debuted “Best Schools for Your Housing Buck”. The list is a unique ranking of the top 25 U.S. areas where parents can find the best schools at every housing price range, including the 2009 national median home price of $178,000. You can read the entire article, which includes the list of schools, on Forbes.com at: www.forbes.com/greatschools.

“Best Schools for Your Housing Buck” dispels the common notion that high performing schools can only be found in expensive communities. While affluent cities and good schools often go hand in hand, the list demonstrates that if parents are relocating, they don’t have to compromise on their child’s education. They can find a great school within their housing budget.

Kingsport-Bristol area is the tenth most obese metro area in the country

March 3rd, 2010 1 comment

The Kingsport, Tennessee area have gotten themselves more National attention with the recent Gallup-Healthways surveys.

WebMD article below gives (America’s Most Obese Metropolitan Areas) a summary of Gallup’s findings.

Please go to the Gallup link (What America’s Most Obese Metro Areas Have in Common) for more detail.

Do we need more restaurants in the Kingsport area?

America’s Most Obese Metropolitan Areas

March 3, 2010 — A ranking of No. 1 — or being in the Top 10 — isn’t always something to crow about.

The latest Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index lists the 10 most obese metropolitan areas in the U.S. and finds that adult obesity rates in each are significantly greater than the national average of 26.5%.

Here’s a list of the 10 most obese metro areas, with those ranking highest having the greatest obesity rates.

  1. (tie) Montgomery, Ala., and Stockton, Calif.: 34.6%
  2. Visalia/Porterville, Calif.: 34.1%
  3. York/Hanover, Pa.: 34%
  4. Flint, Mich.: 33.9%
  5. McAllen/Edinburg/Mission, Texas: 33.7%
  6. Bakersfield, Calif.: 33.6%
  7. (tie) Lynchburg, Va., and Huntington/Ashland, West Va., Ky., Ohio: 33%
  8. Kingsport/Bristol, Tenn., Va.: 32.9%
Eating Fruits and Veggies

The latest Well-Being Index also examines factors that are linked to obesity.

Here’s a look at how metro areas ranked according to the percentage eating fruits and vegetables frequently — listed from worst to best. The nationwide percentage is 56.8%.

  1. McAllen/Edinburg/Mission, Texas:  45.7%
  2. Montgomery, Ala.: 52.7%
  3. Bakersfield, Calif.: 53.1%
  4. Stockton, Calif.: 54.8%
  5. Flint, Mich.: 56.4%
  6. Visalia/Porterville, Calif.: 56.6%
  7. Lynchburg, Va.: 56.8%
  8. York/Hanover, Pa.: 59.0%
  9. Huntington/Ashland/ West Va., Ky., Ohio 60.2 %
  10. Kingsport/Bristol Tenn., Va.:  62.2%
Exercising Frequently

Here’s a look at the rankings — from worst to best — of the percentage of people exercising frequently. The percentage nationwide is 49.9%.

  1. Montgomery, Ala.:  43.3%
  2. Flint, Mich.:  44.5%
  3. McAllen/Edinburg/Mission, Texas: 45.8%
  4. Lynchburg, Va.: 46.1%
  5. Huntington/Ashland, W. Va., Ky., Ohio:   47.7%
  6. York/Hanover, Pa.: 47.8%
  7. Bakersfield, Calif.:  48.4%
  8. Kingsport/Bristol, Tenn., Va.: 48.5%
  9. Visalia/Porterville, Calif.:  49.2%
  10. Stockton, Calif.:  51%

Gallup-Healthways says in a news release that eight of the 10 most obese areas rank in the bottom two-thirds in terms of having easy access to fruits and vegetables and nine rank in the bottom two-thirds for having a safe place to exercise.

Seven of the 10 most obese metro areas rank among the bottom 25 places where residents say there have been times in the past year when they didn’t have enough money to buy food for themselves or family members.

Obesity’s Link to Health Problems

The researchers note that obesity often is a precursor to chronic health problems, including high blood pressure, high cholesterol, diabetes, and heart attack. These conditions were included in the Gallup-Healthways physical health index.

The report also finds that:

  • Each of the 10 most obese metro areas are in the bottom two-thirds of all places in terms of diabetes.
  • The Huntington/Ashland areas of West Va., Kentucky, and Ohio, with Montgomery, Ala., and the Kingsport/Bristol area on the Tennessee-Virginia line are in the bottom 10 among all metro areas surveyed in regard to blood pressure, with rates nearly 10 percentage points above the national average.
  • Huntington and Kingsport, along with Lynchburg, are in the bottom 10 for high cholesterol.
  • Huntington and Kingsport are among the bottom 10 for heart attacks, with rates almost twice the national average.
  • Four of the 10 most obese areas are in the top third among all metro areas for not smoking, but the other six rank in the bottom two-thirds.

The Gallup-Wellbeing report is based on telephone interviews with more than 353,000 adults 18 and over between Jan. 2, 2009, and Dec. 29, 2009. It has a margin of sampling error of 0.2 percentage points.

via America’s Most Obese Metropolitan Areas.

Copyright ©2009, WebMD, LLC. All rights reserved

Residential Building Permit Trend Report – 3rd quarter 2009

October 19th, 2009 No comments

Residential building permits are showing a –42.0% decrease for third quarter 08 to third quarter 09 in Sullivan County, Tennessee.  See the link for more detail  Residential Building Permit Trend Report from The Market Edge.

The Residential Building Permit Trend Report has data from the states of North Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee, Kentucky, and South Carolina.

image

Shocking News About Sullivan County Aging Population

October 8th, 2009 No comments

I have done many posts concerning the median age and population in Sullivan County, Tennessee and  Sullivan County has one of the oldest populations in the state (click here to view the data).

The data below is from the state and I hope will help illustrate exactly what will happen if Sullivan County continues as it has in the past.

Below in the graph is a breakdown on the population for the different age groups in Sullivan County for the census year 2000 and projections for year 2025.  Sullivan County population in year 2000 was 153,048 and is projected to be 161,262 in year 2025.

Note that in the graph below that the 2025 population for all age groups are less for age groups that are under the 55 to 59 age group.  The year 2025 graph shows that the population numbers shows the population growing for for ages group 55 and up.  The largest single age group with the largest population is the age group 75 and up and the larger part of them are females.

Sulivan-County-2000-to-2025

Is Sullivan County equipped to handle the aging population?  There should great demand for those businesses offering services to the elderly.  But, if you are a pediatric physician, you might want to start your practice elsewhere because of the low birth rate in Sullivan County.

The table below gives the actual population numbers for the different age groups.  I have added the year 2010 which is not plotted in the above graph so you can see what is projected for 2010.  The data from the state is given as number of males and females for each age group and I have added the male and female population numbers together in the table below and the graph.

Population Projections for Sullivan County, TN



Year
Age Group200020102025
0 to 48,5428,5937,897
5 to 99,4119,0128,498
10 to 149,7098,6978,538
15 to 199,2048,3307,514
20 to 247,7788,6927,638
25 to 299,6259,7518,180
30 to 3410,4208,6699,154
35 to 3911,53410,0789,887
40 to 4411,87310,86410,597
45 to 4911,54311,6979,357
50 to 5411,24111,64410,368
55 to 599,77611,50111,410
60 to 648,06610,98111,817
65 to 696,9199,11211,197
70 to 746,3586,9819,705
75 and up11,04913,96019,506
Total 153,048158,560161,262

You can view the data for other Tennessee Counties which includes projections for every five years up to year 2025.  Click on the link below to go to the Tennessee webpage

Demographic Information on Age-Gender Composition

In addition to the population projections for each Tennessee city and county contained in the report above, you may access more detailed cohort-component data for a city or county below. (Please note that updated demographic projections will be forthcoming.)

Please either click a county on the Tennessee state map or click a county name in the alphabetical list below the map to access the cohort-component data. Note the Word of Caution following table listed below.

Click here to view state data for Tennessee Counties


I am one of the older population and am concerned about the future of Sullivan County.   No, you can’t move us out of the county, but you should be concerned about the future of the county when we have left this world.  There must be something in place to keep young people in Sullivan County.  A good start would be get companies that have good paying jobs to locate here.   If you too are concerned, talk to your elected officials.  You can email them at the following links.

email Kingsport BMA

email Candidates for Tennessee Governor

email Tennessee Legislators for area

email Sullivan County Commissioners

See list for

or

Comments are welcome.

Governor Bredesen, Commissioner Kisber Announce Unilever Expansion in Covington

October 6th, 2009 No comments

West Tennessee wins and East Tennessee loses again.  What are our local elected officials doing to bring  jobs to the Sullivan County area?

Project will Create 275 New Jobs and an Investment of $100 Million

NASHVILLE – Governor Phil Bredesen and Commissioner Matt Kisber of the Department of Economic and Community Development announced today that the Unilever plant in Covington, Tenn. will be expanding, generating an investment of $100 million and creating approximately 275 new jobs.

“This is great news for Unilever and the state of Tennessee,” Governor Bredesen said. “These new jobs are the result of a strong partnership between the state and the local community. I’m pleased Unilever has chosen to further solidify its presence in Tennessee and we look forward to working with them on this ambitious expansion project.”

Read more via Governor Bredesen, Commissioner Kisber Announce Unilever Expansion in Covington | TN.gov Newsroom.

Tennessee Counties Median Age Ranking Report

October 5th, 2009 No comments

The table below shows the median age for all of the 95 Tennessee counties.  Sullivan County has a rank of 5 for higher median age and is the 9th largest county in Tennessee.  Data is from the links below.

Population of Tennessee Counties in 2008

Population Estimates by Age in 2008

RankTennessee Counties (or equivalents)Median AgePopulation
1Benton, TN43.916,193
2Cumberland, TN43.753,590
3Pickett, TN43.54,801
4Unicoi, TN43.317,718
5Sullivan, TN42.9153,900
6Roane, TN42.753,430
7Henry, TN42.631,770
8Clay, TN42.47,794
9Loudon, TN42.146,445
10Anderson, TN41.874,169
10Decatur, TN41.811,288
12Johnson, TN41.718,112
13Jackson, TN41.510,847
13Moore, TN41.56,195
15Hardin, TN41.326,227
15Obion, TN41.331,375
17Giles, TN40.929,184
18Carroll, TN40.828,719
18Hancock, TN40.86,693
18Polk, TN40.815,671
21Humphreys, TN40.718,149
22Greene, TN40.666,157
23Hawkins, TN40.557,477
24Houston, TN40.48,137
24Lincoln, TN40.433,116
24Perry, TN40.47,753
27Carter, TN40.359,492
27McNairy, TN40.325,724
27Stewart, TN40.313,226
30Campbell, TN40.240,936
30Van Buren, TN40.25,481
32Cocke, TN40.135,688
32Overton, TN40.120,975
34Claiborne, TN4031,461
35Marion, TN39.928,247
36Hamilton, TN39.8332,848
37Blount, TN39.7121,511
37Fentress, TN39.717,667
37Gibson, TN39.749,257
37White, TN39.725,129
41Bledsoe, TN39.613,142
41Franklin, TN39.641,165
41McMinn, TN39.652,511
44Sevier, TN39.584,835
45Grainger, TN39.322,708
46Cannon, TN39.213,804
47Crockett, TN39.114,186
48Trousdale, TN397,822
48Wayne, TN3916,614
50Lewis, TN38.811,564
51Coffee, TN38.752,134
52DeKalb, TN38.618,694
53Dyer, TN38.537,600
53Lawrence, TN38.540,954
53Meigs, TN38.511,790
53Morgan, TN38.520,404
53Washington, TN38.5118,639
58Hamblen, TN38.462,132
58Union, TN38.419,008
60Henderson, TN38.226,916
60Smith, TN38.219,107
60Warren, TN38.239,842
63Cheatham, TN38.139,396
63Grundy, TN38.114,220
63Hickman, TN38.123,841
66Haywood, TN3819,024
66Jefferson, TN3851,074
68Rhea, TN37.830,781
69Hardeman, TN37.727,848
69Knox, TN37.7430,019
69Monroe, TN37.745,648
69Sumner, TN37.7155,474
73Marshall, TN37.529,731
73Sequatchie, TN37.513,580
75Bradley, TN37.496,472
75Williamson, TN37.4171,452
77Wilson, TN37.3109,803
78Dickson, TN37.247,884
79Weakley, TN37.133,375
80Macon, TN3721,838
81Maury, TN36.981,938
82Davidson, TN36.8626,144
83Madison, TN36.596,376
84Lake, TN36.37,323
84Scott, TN36.322,039
86Chester, TN36.116,309
87Lauderdale, TN3626,692
87Robertson, TN3664,898
89Shelby, TN35.8906,825
90Tipton, TN35.658,706
91Fayette, TN35.338,173
92Putnam, TN3571,160
93Bedford, TN34.544,696
94Montgomery, TN33.1154,756
95Rutherford, TN32.2249,270
Source: US Census Bureau

Business and Personal Bankruptcy Ranking for Tennessee

October 5th, 2009 No comments

The recession has hit Tennessee with business and personal Bankruptcies.  Below in the table is the bankruptcy by chapter and type for 2nd quarter of 2009.  Note the rank that Tennessee has by clicking on the highlighted link in blue. In the data below, Chapter 13 personal bankruptcy is the third worst in the nation in Tennessee.

Elected officials should think twice about raising taxes, funding a pet project at taxpayers expense.


Tennessee -  Bankruptcy by Chapter and Type in Qtr:2 of 2009**NumberRankPercent DistributionRank
Business Bankruptcy
Total33315100.0% 
Chapter 72191665.8%37
Chapter 11881026.4%10
Chapter 12742.1%13
Chapter 1319205.7%33
Personal Bankruptcy
Total13,0128100.0% 
Chapter 76,7041251.5%47
Chapter 112150.2%7
Chapter 136,287348.3%5

**Source: Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts

In the table above, Tennessee has a rank of 8 for total personal bankruptcy.  However if you consider the population, Tennessee is the 2nd worst state for bankruptcy per person in the 2nd quarter of 2009 as indicated in the table below.


StatePopulationBankruptciesBankruptcy Rank per PersonBankruptcy per Person
Nevada2,600,1677,93010.0030
Tennessee6,214,88813,01220.0021
Indiana6,376,79212,88530.0020
Alabama4,661,9008,50840.0018
Georgia9,685,74417,58550.0018
Michigan10,003,42217,69060.0018
Ohio11,485,91018,41870.0016
Kentucky4,269,2456,27480.0015
Colorado4,939,4567,11390.0014
California36,756,66651,239100.0014
Missouri5,911,6058,149110.0014
Illinois12,901,56317,740120.0014
Arkansas2,855,3903,893130.0014
Utah2,736,4243,664140.0013
Wisconsin5,627,9677,505150.0013
Arizona6,500,1808,646160.0013
Florida18,328,34024,111170.0013
Oregon3,790,0604,865180.0013
Idaho1,523,8161,955190.0013
Rhode Island1,050,7881,302200.0012
Mississippi2,938,6183,494210.0012
Virginia7,769,0899,149220.0012
Washington6,549,2247,648230.0012
Maryland5,633,5976,233240.0011
Nebraska1,783,4321,903250.0011
Kansas2,802,1342,933260.0010
Minnesota5,220,3935,404270.0010
New Jersey8,682,6618,763280.0010
Louisiana4,410,7964,451290.0010
Oklahoma3,642,3613,519300.0010
New Hampshire1,315,8091,199310.0009
Iowa3,002,5552,696320.0009
West Virginia1,814,4681,607330.0009
Massachusetts6,497,9675,455340.0008
Montana967,440768350.0008
Delaware873,092680360.0008
Maine1,316,4561,011370.0008
New York19,490,29714,867380.0008
Pennsylvania12,448,2799,389390.0008
Connecticut3,501,2522,575400.0007
North Carolina9,222,4146,635410.0007
New Mexico1,984,3561,419420.0007
Wyoming532,668364430.0007
North Dakota641,481429440.0007
South Dakota804,194525450.0007
Vermont621,270379460.0006
Hawaii1,288,198752470.0006
Texas24,326,97412,700480.0005
South Carolina4,479,8002,278490.0005
District of Columbia591,833285500.0005
Alaska686,293241510.0004

Past and New Direction of the No WhiteWash! Blog

September 3rd, 2009 No comments

This blog was started in February 2007 with the title of “Kingsport, TN Government”.  The name was later changed to “No WhiteWash!”, a name less focused on one local government.  We are still focused on Kingsport, TN Government and have expanded into issues that affect Sullivan County, North East Tennessee area, and the State as they are in a lot of case interrelated.

The direction of this blog for the future will be for the average citizen and not the elites who choose to run things for their own self-interest.  There will be no favoritism toward a political party in this blog.  WARNING:  If you are a elected official or running for office and make statements that you can’t back up or not exactly telling the full story, then this blog will expose them.  If you are running for office or an elected official who wants to use this blog for political advantage, then I would suggest you go elsewhere to peddle your story.  This blog is for the people!!

This little blog now has readership that is around 1,000 visits per day and that number could be much higher because other blogs re-publish this blog posts to their blogs.  There have been over 1,700 posts written in this blog since inception and the posts are not forgotten as they slide down the page as newer post take their place on the first page.  The search traffic coming to this blog is very large because this blog posts are indexed on all of the major search engines (Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, etc).  All of the posts go into a RSS news feed where readers can read the posts without having to visit the blog.  The folks using the RSS feed amounts to many hundred per day.

Over the last few years I have seen more local people become more vocal about expressing their views concerning how the local governments operate.  They express their views in the comments areas in the local newspapers, blogs, social media sites (Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, etc)  There have been many local blogs that have been started in the North East Tennessee area in the last few years and I think we will see more of it.

Blogs do get a lot of readership.  The Tea Party protests got their start from blogs and with very little help from local media.

The Show blog is another local blog that has come online and also has it own local talk radio show on Monday and Thursday from 6-8pm on WMCH AM1260.  Local issues are discussed in this radio talk show and in many cases the posts from this blog are discussed and the radio talk show does allow callers to phone in and express their views. 

I have learned much about the City of Kingsport government on how they operate.  The research that I have done has me very concerned about how the “elites” control the city and do things that are in their self-interests.  I do have a concern about their lack to fully understand the problems the area has such as low median wages, declining population, high unemployment, lack of good paying jobs, and young adults leaving the area to find work, etc.

I also have a concern how the mayor selects political appointees to serve on different committees so he can be assured that he get what he wants.  The reporting in the Kingsport Times-News is almost always, in my view, protecting the city officials.  One has to understand that if they reported anything negative about the city, then it would reflect on the upper management at the Kingsport Times-News.  This is because there are many of the top management at the Times-News that are Mayor Dennis Phillips’ political appointees.

We could go on about how certain people decide who should run for political office and then campaign for them and put up the money for them to get elected.

We could talk about the Ridgefield County Club elites or look at the details of the spending of city money by the Kingsport Chamber of Commerce, but these could be posts for another day.

There have been many that have sent this blog information concerning the operation of our local governments and I want to say thank you.  Please continue reporting as you have in the past.

If you have anything to report concerning the below areas, feel free to use the email icon below to report it. The source of the information will be kept confidential.

  • City of Kingsport, TN
  • City of Bristol, TN
  • Sullivan County, TN
  • North East, TN
  • Tennessee Government

Issues such as wasteful spending, local elections, annexation, ethics, crime, conflicts of interest, backroom deals, open government, abuse of taxpayer money, etc., are examples to report, but not limited to those listed.

אורן יומטוב