Archive

Archive for the ‘Pat Shull’ Category

Kingsport Alderman Candidate Mallicote states Cincinnati is not recruiting businesses

May 16th, 2009 9 comments

Below is a video from the KNETIC debate, that shows two different perspectives on economic development between Pat Shull and Ben Mallicote, who are both running for re-election for the Kingsport Board of Mayor and Alderman.

Ben Mallicote stated in the KNETIC debate that Cincinnati, Ohio is not recruiting businesses and instead recruiting people.  Read the Cincinnati 2009-2013 Work Plan at the bottom of this post and decide yourself if the statement that Ben Mallicote made concerning Cincinnati is a true statement.  Also click on the links below and I think you will see that Cincinnati has a lot going on concerning economic development.

He appears to be anti-smokestack type businesses, but I should remind Ben Mallicote, that the patents that he talks about most likely came from those companies like Eastman that have smokestacks.


Cincinnati also states the following.

Each new company that locates here fortifies the entire region. Research shows that one new company bringing 50 new jobs will create 51 additional jobs in other industries, generating $4.1 million in wages and salaries for the total 101 jobs. This triggers an estimated 67 new housing units with $6.8 million in sales and, subsequently, $2.6 million spent on food, clothing, vehicle, entertainment and other goods purchased. One company. 50 new jobs. Significant regional impact for everyone.

2008 Annual Report

2008 Regional Business Growth Report

2008 Regional Business Retention Report

City of Cincinnati

Below is page 16 from the 2008 Annual Report

Cincinnati

Related posts

East Tennessee City pours more money into losing investment

April 29th, 2009 1 comment

I must admit that the decision of the Kingsport BMA to spend over $15 million for an expansion of the MeadowView Convention Center has really raised my blood pressure.

I have written many posts concerning this issue and feel that politics is playing a big part in the decision to expand the convention center.  Good common business sense seems to be absent for the five BMA members (Phillips, Mallicote, Joh, Shupe, Munsey) who voted to expand the convention center.  It appears that there is an incestuous relationship with special interest groups

Alderman Marsh implored the mayor to get public input before the vote, but the mayor railroaded the convention center expansion to a vote.  Alderman Marsh and Shull voted to give back to the city property owners the 1/4 percent regional sales tax that was used to pay off the current convention center, but the gang of five prevailed.

The taxpayers have invested $25.7 million in the current MeadowView Convention Center and Cattails golf course.  The convention center has never made money and the golf course barely breaks even.

The City of Kingsport is spending another $15 million to expand the convention center into an executive conference center.

One needs to ask, what is the real cost to the taxpayers for Kingsport’s part of MeadowView? The combined cost of the current convention center, golf course and the new expansion would be about $41 million.

To get the true cost, the interest expense for the bonds must be added to the cost.  In the table below you will see the actual cost after applying the different interest rates.  The bond life used is 20 years.

Cost Interest Expense Real Cost Interest Rate
41,000,000 18,628,464 59,628,464 4.00%
41,000,000 17,340,210 58,340,210 3.75%
41,000,000 16,068,036 57,068,036 3.50%

I would like to ask, are there any citizens in Kingsport that would invest $57 – $59.6 million in a project that did not make money for them?

It is up to you as voters to decide your future.  Mallicote, Joh, and Phillips who are running for re-election voted to spend more money on the money-losing convention center.

Alderman Shull who is also running for re-election voted against the convention center expansion and instead voted to give the regional sales tax back to city property owners.

I must warn you to beware of the spin that the city officials have been putting out concerning MeadowView.  If MeadowView has been that great for Kingsport, then why do we have a declining population, negative retail growth after inflation, and the highest unemployment rate in the Tri-Cities area.  You decide…see data

Related posts

Mallicote voted not to give back regional sales tax to citizens

April 23rd, 2009 3 comments

It appears that Kingsport, TN Alderman Ben Mallicote, who is running for re-election, is trying to defend his vote to not give back the regional sales tax back to the property owners in Kingsport. 

The gang of five (Phillips, Mallicote, Joh, Munsey, and Shupe) voted to use the 1/4 percent regional sales tax for a new Convention Center Expansion.   Kingsport citizens back in mid 1990’s voted for the 1/4 percent regional sales tax to build the Meadowview Convention Center.

This became apparent in the Rotary Club debate yesterday when Alderman Shull stated that he voted to give the regional sales tax back to the citizens.  Since the Convention Center debt was paid off, Alderman Shull as well as Alderman Marsh were attempting to return the money back to the citizens via a property tax reduction.

I am not surprised at Ben Mallicote’s position.  He made the following statement in 2008, “I do not believe all of the doom and gloom about the economy”. 

Related posts

Kingsport Rotary Club selects Mayor candidate to moderate Alderman debate

April 23rd, 2009 No comments

The Kingsport Rotary Club held a debate for the candidates seeking a position on the Kingsport Board of Mayor and Alderman.

The Kingsport Times-News article below fails to mention that the moderator for the debate was Mayor Dennis Dennis Phillips who is running unopposed for a third term as mayor.

It is no secret that the Mayor would like certain candidates to win in the upcoming election.  I am shocked that the Rotary Club would select the Mayor as moderator and not surprised that Mayor Dennis Phillips accepted.

Kingsport citizens deserve better ethics.

KINGSPORT – Five of the candidates running for seats on the Kingsport Board of Mayor and Aldermen presented themselves to another local civic club on Wednesday, with two of the candidates sparring over their philosophy for the direction of Kingsport.

Kingsport’s city election is May 19, and six candidates are running for the three open alderman seats. The incumbents – Valerie Joh, Ben Mallicote and Pat Shull – are facing challenges from Wade McClellan, Mike McIntire and Tom Parham. Dennis Phillips is running unopposed for a third term as mayor.

Read more via Kingsport Times-News Online – Kingsport,

Related posts

Pat Shull, Candidate for Kingsport Board of Mayor and Alderman interview

April 23rd, 2009 No comments

Listen to the April 22 WJCW radio interview with Pat Shull who is seeking re-election as Alderman on the Kingsport Board of Mayor and Alderman

Click here for interview

A recent Kingsport Times-News article below gives additional information on Pat Shull.

Shull is a retired U.S. Army colonel, owner of Mary’s Kitchen Shop in downtown Kingsport, and more recently, the chief of staff for the president of Virginia Intermont College. Shull said the one thing he would like to see accomplished if re-elected is a vision for the future of Kingsport over the next 10 to 20 years.

“We don’t do that. We tackle projects one at a time, incrementally,” Shull said, noting the city could have a variety of summits (economic and education) and work on a comprehensive annexation plan for the city. “I believe in limited, responsible government, keeping our taxes low, and I’m fiscally conservative. We can have a first-class infrastructure, good schools while keeping taxes low.”

Coping with a recession in a thoughtful and intelligent manner is what Shull thinks is Kingsport’s greatest challenge.

“Three years ago, we went over a list of capital projects, and one of the board members said we can do it all without raising taxes. That’s been the thought of a majority of the board,” Shull said. “In the meantime we’ve almost doubled our city debt. We need to prioritize spending and gradually reduce our debt. We need to take a look at some of these projects. Some of these projects we’ve done, there are areas where we disagreed and spent more money than we needed to.”

Related posts

Sullivan County, TN School Capacity

February 19th, 2009 2 comments

At the February 17, 2008 Kingsport, TN Board of Mayor and Alderman meeting, Alderman Pat Shull expressed his views/concerns over a Kingsport Times-News editorial Lawmakers should facilitate school consolidation efforts.

Below is what he presented at the BMA meeting.


TALKING POINTS: SULLIVAN COUNTY SCHOOL CAPACITY

  • INTRO – The Sullivan County Commission is currently debating the issues of declining school enrollment, subsequent over-capacity of Sullivan County Schools, and how best to address these issues to save money without compromising academic standards.
  • This issue should concern  Kingsport residents since the majority of our citizens live and pay taxes in  Sullivan County
  • I’ve surfaced this issue before, especially in a paper that I wrote – any unnecessary spending in the Sullivan County system affects us
  • This past Sunday the Times-News published an Editorial  on this issue
  • First, they praised Commissioner Brittenham for urging cooperation with the respective cities within the county.  I also commend her, and I commend the commission for taking on this issue.  I don’t  know the specific actions that they should take, let’s see the results of their analysis and discussions
  • Tennessee State Law allows for cooperation within a county with multiple school districts  and I urge the respective school boards to work together
  • One commissioner suggested raising the county sales tax rate.  Strictly in terms of supporting Kingsport City schools I believe this action to be unnecessary.
  • The editorial recommends Consolidation of the County and City School Systems under one consolidated Board of Education with taxing authority.  I am adamantly opposed to this.  I cannot support any action that might weaken educational standards in Kingsport City Schools.
  • Further, I believe that creation of a new taxing authority that would compete with the Cities and County Commission for scarce public funds is a very bad idea.
  • In summary, let’s give the County Commission time to work through this issue and determine how to save money.  Kingsport should be prepared to cooperate in ways that make sense, but similar to the first rule of medical practice – we should do no harm to the current City School System.
Related posts

Alderman Shull’s perspective on the Kingsport Aquatic Center

February 4th, 2009 5 comments

I think that your readers may be interested in a quick history on the Aquatic Center.

Before I joined the BMA the board established a fund to repair the Legion Pool. Previous Boards “raided” that fund. The City tried patching the pool several times, but the pool continued to leak.

The BMA then considered starting over again with a new pool in current location. Then the board began entertaining the idea of also having an indoor pool, quickly emerged into the Aquatic Center concept.

Let’s pause – the entire BMA agreed that the current situation – leaking old pool was unacceptable. But then the differences in opinions began to emerge as the City staff provided different versions of an Aquatic Center. While ALL members requested that the City manager discuss the situation with the YMCA, it was never immediately agreed upon (as was inferred last night at the BMA business meeting) that the city would enter the type of agreement with the YMCA that we seem to be headed toward.

Last summer we had a special called session to decide 2 issues: 1) Location of the pool, and 2) Should it be co-located with the YMCA. I voted against BOTH for the following reasons.

- The Meadowview is not the ideal location for the pool. I won’t elaborate here, but I would be glad to discuss further with any citizen. I favored the Legion Pool area

- Co-locating with the YMCA gives them a tremendous competitive advantage over the other fitness center operators. In effect, the city would be subsidizing an already NON-PROFIT organization to the detriment of tax-paying enterprises in the city (Great Body Company and others).

I asked the question of Mr. Gray, the YMCA Board President, that night – what would the Y do if the city built a world-class outdoor pool at the legion area? He replied that they would go forth with their plans (an outdoor & indoor pool plus fitness center) at their site behind K-Mart. He ALSO assured us that they had the funding to do this.

I immediately proposed to my fellow members that we build the city facility at Legion (a great new outdoor pool) and let the YMCA build theirs. Please note that the citizens of Kingsport would then have two options for indoor swimming – the Dobyns-Bennett pool and the YMCA.

Not only do I believe this to be the best option, I’m even more strongly for it considering the Recession that we are now in. What’s wrong with saving tax-payer dollars.

As a side note about the DB pool. It belongs to the citizens – we simply need to get that point across to the BOE.

One other point – under the current concept the Y will only build a fitness center (no pools) right next door to the City Aquatic Center. This will save them a lot of money. I have nothing against the Y. But I’m interested in saving the City money.

Thank you.

Pat Shull, Alderman

Technorati Tags:
Related posts

Mayor is out of control with spending in a recession

January 28th, 2009 5 comments

In this recession, the City of Kingsport, Tennessee has decided to go ahead with borrowing $34.77 million to fund various projects listed below.  While companies and citizens are having a difficult time in this economy, the city is going ahead with the spending of taxpayers money.  The addition of the $34.77 million would put the total debt for the City of Kingsport around $190 million.

According to Moody’s the three bonds have been issued and are listed below.  The dollar amounts below do not include interest expense.

General Obligation Public Improvement Bonds, Series 2009A
Sale Date: 22 JAN 2009
Sale Amt: $12.31 million

The detailed spending for this bond is listed in the table below.

K Play Park and Recreation Facility Improvements (Grant Match) $400,000
Various Road Improvements listed below (items 1-5)
1. Cleek Road Phase I – This project consists of adding width to both New Beasonwell Rd. and Cleek Rd. at their intersection with Stone Drive (SR 1, US 1IW) to provide for the separation of left, thru and right turns, reduce delays and improve the alignment between left turning traffic. Also included in this project is the addition of a left turn lane on Stone Dr. westbound for traffic turning onto Cleek Rd. as well as the extension of the eastbound left turn. This project would improve approximately 500′ of New Beasonwell Rd. and 770′ of Cleek Rd. $825,000
2. Harbor Chapel Road – This project would provide a wider two lane roadway with a multi-use mobility path along Harbor Chapel Drive from just south of Skyland Dr. to Cooks Valley Rd. and also improve the alignment of Cooks Valley Road between Harbor Chapel Road and Harbor Springs Dr. At the Road Workshop this was presented as a two phase project due to maintenance of traffic, however at this time we propose that it be design as one project and we will take care of the maintenance of traffic through the contract documents. $1,680,000
3. Clinchfield / Center Intersection Improvements – This project includes the resurfacing of the intersection, mast arm traffic signal, additional right turn lanes and an additional lane in the area of the old railroad bed to align the two Clinchfield St. approaches and provide a left turn northbound. This will remove the grade problem the railroad tracks caused and provide for reduced delays and confusion. $385,000
4. Netherland Inn Road / Industry Drive / Center Street Roundabout – This project would construct a modern roundabout at this intersection, similar to the one built at the intersections of Watauga / Gibson Mill / Ravine. This would Increase safety and reduce delay and confusion experienced at the existing intersection and is an integral part of the development of the Kingsport Riverwalk Redevelopment. $935,000
5. Rock Springs Road Improvements – This project involves upgrading Rock Springs Road from the southwesterly City Limits to Rock Springs Drive (SR 347) to an improved two-lane section. It will provide wider travel lanes, shoulder and some realignments at key locations to improve safety. $1,175,000
Stormwater Management Project – Modeling Study, Land Acquisition, Pipe $700,000
Riverwalk Project – Land acquisition, engineering design studies, select infrastructure improvements $600,000
School Projects – land acquisition, expand band room, security modifications for school entrances $1,100,000
Library Design and renovations – site assessment and preliminary design $200,000
Justice Center – design and architect fees (Total cost $4,000,000) $260,000
Downtown Parking Garage – 300 space garage with retail and office space $3,800,000
Bond #1 General Improvement Bond total for above items $12,305,000

General Obligation Bonds, Series 2009B
Sale Date: 22 JAN 2009
Sale Amt: $7.15 million

The bond above is for rebuilding of the V.O. Dobbins Community Center as well as the creation of a new non-profit center.  This non-profit center will take tenants away from the private sector, which means, the City of Kingsport becomes a competitor with it’s own tax customers.  Alderman Marsh and Shull voted against this project.

Local Option Sales Tax Revenue and Tax Bonds, Series 2009C
Sale Date: 22 JAN 2009
Sale Amt: $15.31 million

The above bond is for the MeadowView Conference Center Expansion.  This expansion is a very controversial subject with many citizens because of it benefiting special interest groups.  The current convention center loses money and it wishful thinking that the expansion would break even.

This new $15.31 million bond for the convention center expansion combined with the $25.7 million already spent for the current convention center and Cattails Golf Course would make it $41 million that the taxpayers will have poured into MeadowView.  The Cattails and the current convention center do not make money.  Alderman Marsh and Shull voted against this project.  See link for additional information on Meadowview

Technorati Tags:
Related posts

Kingsport’s water and sewer departments overcharges customers?

January 26th, 2009 No comments

The Kingsport Times-News article, Fiscal year 2008 audit OKs Kingsport financial health does some explaining on the recent audit of Kingsport’s finances.

However there seems to be some things left out or a press release issued by the city that never made it into the newspaper.

The press release below in the last two paragraphs state that the five enterprise funds had $16.3 million in cash.

Enterprise funds have to be self-supporting and we know that the Cattails Golf Course does not make any money and the MeadowView Convention Center ended the year with a $1.3 million loss

This would mean that the city is running a profit center in the water and sewer departments.  The raising of water and sewer rates each year has helped this cash position.  How else could they have gotten all of this extra cash?

If the City of Kingsport is doing so well, then how come they did not want to refund the 1/4 percent regional sales tax, back to the citizens when the MeadowView Convention Center was paid off?   Alderman Marsh and Shull tried to get the regional sales tax refunded back to the citizens but was voted down by Mayor Phillips, Vice Mayor Mallicote, Aldermen Munsey, Joh, and Shupe.

Press Release

KINGSPORT – Kingsport garnered a clean opinion of its financial statement for fiscal year 2008 from auditors Blackburn, Childers & Steagall, and rectified all four findings reported in the prior year.

“This audit represents what the citizens of Kingsport expect from their local government, transparency in financial reporting and responsibility with the taxpayer dollar,” Kingsport Audit Committee Chair and Alderman Larry Munsey said Tuesday. “I’m pleased to note that city finance staff corrected four items identified in last year’s audit, while auditors, whose job it is to go over things with a fine-tooth comb, only found three items in need of some work going forward into 2009. By any measure, our city continues to stand on firm financial ground.”

Auditors noted in their 2008 findings the need for a change in the way property purchases and sales are recorded by the Kingsport Industrial Development Board; better record keeping on the disposition of city capital assets; and better segregation of duties within payroll processing.

“We’re very pleased with this report, and already have projects underway to address the findings on capital asset recording and payroll processing,” Kingsport Finance Director Jim Demming said Tuesday. “The third finding on KIDB is just a matter of changing from net reporting to include all costs related to property acquisitions and sales.”

Demming also noted that the addition of a new internal auditor position and realignment of finance staff duties should quickly correct the findings.

Meanwhile, as of June 30, Kingsport posted $14.84 million in its unrestricted fund balance for 2008, with another $3 million to be added over the next few years as the general fund is repaid funding it advanced for the construction of Cattails Golf Course. Board policy is to maintain a minimum of $11.4 million at all times.

City Manager John Campbell said the pace of city government has quickened with regards to a number of key areas, including the development of a higher education center; greater internal support for job recruitment and retention efforts; expansion of commercial and tourism development; and implementing technology to increase efficiency.

“We have the staff in place to ensure we offer the greatest transparency possible,” Campbell said. “At the same time, we continue to operate well within the self-imposed debt limit of 10 percent of assessed property value, with new capital projects funded by the debt service roll-off as old debt is paid off.

“Without a doubt, the Board of Mayor and Aldermen is making sound investments that position our community for continued growth, which is how we keep property taxes low for everyone.”

Kingsport City Government is organized into six reporting units, starting with the general fund which covers emergency services, development services, leisure services and administration.

Five enterprise funds include the water fund, for the production and distribution of clean water, funded solely by user fees; a sewer fund, again self-supporting through user fees; a solid waste fund for garbage collection and disposal, reported separately but funded through property taxes; and two funds that cover MeadowView Conference Center and the golf course.

Collectively, enterprise funds reported $16.3 million in cash as of June 30, a strong cash position Campbell said he intends to maintain.

Technorati Tags:
Related posts

Mike McIntire – no fresh ideas, but wants to run for Kingsport’s BMA

January 25th, 2009 No comments

The Kingsport Times-News article, Mike McIntire files petition to run for Kingsport alderman, to me revealed that Mike Mclntire does not offer much except to say that he agrees with the direction that Kingsport has been going in the past.

It is my opinion that Mike McIntire has been hand picked to run as an alderman, because his views coincides with the majority on the Board of Mayor and Alderman.  It appears that Mike McIntire and Tom Parham are being used to replace Pat Shull in this upcoming election.  But at least Pat Shull has put out information that shows he is willing to think outside of the box.

There are no fresh ideas, he has no problem with the debt the city has and states that  he understands why some people think MeadowView is for the elite but he is for the MeadowView expansion.

Both Mike Mclntire and Tom Parham could be labeled as “insiders” because of their past involvement with the City of Kingsport and I am not sure this is what we need.  Currently, we have the “gang of five” (Phillips, Mallicote, Munsey, Joh, and Shupe) on the BMA that almost vote the same on every issue.  It is my opinion that this “gang of five” does not reflect the views of the majority of the citizens of Kingsport, but instead caters more to the special interest groups.

What Kingsport needs is not another person on the BMA who agrees with everything Mayor Phillips and City Manager, John Campbell wants.

This election is not about special interest groups.  It is an election for the citizens of Kingsport to elect BMA members that reflect their views on the direction that the city should go.  The citizens need to tell the elites, that this election cannot not be won with the elites money.

Is this what the citizens want?  Read the Times-News link above, make comments on the Times-News webpage and also here.

Please leave a comment.

 

Technorati Tags:
Related posts