Archive

Archive for the ‘Jeff Fleming’ Category

Study states that the City of Kingsport should not be aligned with State Theater project

January 11th, 2010 1 comment

image

I have previously written concerning the proposal that the City of Kingsport buy the old State Theater  See post Kingsport Developer gets in over his head, thinks old theater may be haunted and wants city to bail him out.

Now the completed study by the Cinema Preservation Group is out and can be read in its entirety in the link below.  Read and form your own conclusions.

Kingsport Economic Development Board recently voted to spend nearly $10,000 to fund a study to determine the economic impact of a restored theater in downtown Kingsport. The Cinema Preservation Group is now conducting the work.

KEDB Chairman Bob Feathers said he contacted Beatty about the possibility of the city purchasing or investing in the theater after learning that Beatty was considering nonprofit status for the facility.

Feathers said he believes some type of investment can occur to complete the theater project — regardless of what the economic development study shows.

Read more via City may consider buying State Theater building – Kingsport Times-News Online.

In the recent Kingsport Times-News article below, Mayor Dennis Phillips denies that the city plans to buy the State Theatre outright.  I wonder what Mayor Phillips has in mind when he stated “without an enormous expense to the taxpayers”?

Mayor Dennis Phillips said he hopes the study will encourage some individual or organization to invest in the State Theater, complete the renovations, and begin operating it for the benefit of the downtown district.

“I think if we can accomplish this without an enormous expense to the taxpayers, it certainly would be a service that is sorely needed,” Phillips said.

Asked about the Strand Theater, another Broad Street historic facility that has recently been used as a venue for live music and old movies, Phillips said the Cinema Preservation Group study could also be used by the Strand owners if they would want to market the facility one day. The Strand Theatre is owned by Restoration Church.

“I don’t know if the Strand Theater is available today. The Strand Theatre is a church,” he said.

But if the Strand were put on the market, “this report would apply … then it becomes a matter of economics of which one could be done at the least cost,” Phillips said.

He denied that the city plans to buy the State Theatre outright.

via Study envisions new future for State Theatre – Kingsport Times-News Online.

The report from the Cinema Preservation Group states that there are major problems when a non-profit theater is aligned too closely with city hall.  Below are two paragraphs from the study.  I would encourage you to read the entire report.

Non-profit theatres aligned too closely with city hall often fall prey to two particular problems. The first occurs when the theatre building comes to be perceived as a public facility. Various public entities feel that they should be allowed to use the facility for significantly discounted rates, or even for free. Though currently not an issue in the case of the State, this type of agreement is often adopted in order to ensure initial approval for restoration by the council and guarantee the allocation of funds for building renovations and/or other expenses. Severely discounted rates take revenue away from the theatre and occupy blocks of time that could be filled by other groups who would pay to use the building. The second problem arises when city residents perceive the theatre to be a municipal building. When this happens, it becomes extremely difficult to raise money from the community. Fundraising efforts are either simply ignored or opposed outright, and individual donors become wary of contributing to an entity they feel could and should be largely financed by tax dollars.

…….Though ticket and concession sales are the primary sources of revenue for a theatre, there are other means of earning revenue that must be explored. The vast majority of live theatres in America today will never be self-supporting, they can simply never make enough money on ticket sales and concessions to cover expenses. Even in good economic times many theatres are fortunate to earn 50% of their revenue from events. Two strategies for overcoming this revenue shortfall are fundraising and rental.

Read more via The Cinema Preservation Group Study

The survey that was used in the study is questionable because the Cinema Preservation Group chose to use the blog that is maintained by Kingsport’s Assistant Manager, Jeff Flemming.  The readership of Jeff Flemming’s blog in my opinion would show a bias for the city of Kingsport and would not reflect the majority views of the Kingsport citizens.  See Time Sensitive: How do you feel about State Theatre?  I am sure that the response would have been different if this blog posted the survey.

It is interesting that the Cinema Preservation Group is from Asheville, NC.  Prior to coming to Kingsport, Doug Beatty lived in the Asheville area.

Also, it is interesting that  Richard Rose, artistic director at the Barter Theatre in Abingdon, sent a letter of support for the State Theatre restoration to Kingsport City Manager, John Campbell.  Rose said he reviewed the Cinema Preservation study.  It is also interesting that Doug Beatty lives in the Abingdon, Virginia area

See also DKA to partner with Restoration Church on Strand Theater project,

Drama unfolds at DKA press conference on old Strand Theater

Silver Eagle Bus Manufacturing lands in Gallatin | tennessean.com | The Tennessean

June 18th, 2009 No comments

It is great to see a city such as Gallatin get the new bus manufacturing plant.  Is Kingsport and Sullivan County doing anything to bring new jobs to East Tennessee?

Long-term plans to create more than 500 jobs

Silver Eagle reviewed sites in middle and western Tennessee as well as Ohio, Michigan, Alabama, and Mississippi and negotiated with a handful of communities from a short list over the past year before settling on Gallatin.

There were two factors Silver Eagle used to whittle down its short list to a Gallatin focus, Craig Hanloh said. The proactive efforts of Clay Walker, executive director of Gallatin’s Economic Development Agency, was one of those.

“Two things: location and Clay Walker working with us,” Hanloh said. “He’s been very proactive since we had the first discussion. … The cooperation with the city of Gallatin has been outstanding.

Read more via Silver Eagle Bus Manufacturing lands in Gallatin | tennessean.com | The Tennessean.

Kingsport, TN area has one of the largest 1st quarter 2009 loss for House Price Appreciation in the U.S.

June 5th, 2009 No comments

The real estate house prices in the Kingsport area appears to have stopped its rising trend.

Kingsport area had one of the largest 1st quarter 2009 house price decrease of all of the cities in United States that are listed in the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s House Price Index (HPI report.

Kingsport’s first quarter house prices were down –2.9 percent.  This gave Kingsport a rank of 288 out of 294 MSA’s ranked on the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s House Price Index (HPI report. There were six other MSA’s that had a lower 2009 first quarter than Kingsport and they are:

Monroe, LA  -3.08%Reno-Sparks, NV  -3.72%
Decatur, AL  -3.09%Miami-Miami Beach-Kendall,  FL  -4.97%
Montgomery, AL  -3.49%Port St Lucie, FL  -6.3%

Much has been said about the housing values in the Kingsport area. It seem that Kingsport is not doing as well despite what the local politicians have stated.  While it is true that Kingsport did beat other Tennessee areas with its one year growth of 1.27 percent, but, one needs also to look at what has happened in the first quarter of 2009 and also look at the 5-year growth.

There are other areas of Tennessee that did not experience the loss that Kingsport had in the first quarter of 2009 and the other areas have an equal or better 5-year growth.

Metropolitan Statistical Area ++Rank

1-Yr**

1-Yr.Rank 1st Qtr 091st-Qtr. 2009Rank

5-Yr

5-Yr.
Kingsport-Bristol, TN-VA441.27%288-2.99%9128.68%
Nashville-Murfreesboro-Franklin, TN890.00%227-0.79%8729.32%
Knoxville, TN90-0.03%1270.35%8018.50%
Chattanooga, TN-GA921.34%381.94%12122.83%
Memphis, TN-MS-AR125-0.82%491.46%20413.90%

The table below show other Tennessee areas that are not ranked in the home price index report.

Unranked Metropolitan Statistical Areas

1-Yr.5-Yr.
Morristown, TN-1.35%31.87%
Cleveland, TN-1.36%24.95%
Clarksville, TN-KY1.05%28.16%
Jackson, TN0.09%13.52%
Johnson City, TN-0.04%28.57%

(Estimates above use all-transactions HPI which includes purchase and refinance mortgages)

**Note: Rankings based on annual percentage change, for all MSAs containing at least 15,000 transactions over the last 10 years.

The graph below shows the last nine quarters for the Kingsport-Bristol, TN-VA MSA.

Data below is used for above graph.

1st Qtr 07 -1.67%4th Qtr 07 2.14%3rd Qtr 08 0.69%
2nd Qtr 07 1.40%1st Qtr 08 0.62%4th Qtr 08 4.02%
3rd Qtr 07 1.42%2nd Qtr 08 1.51%1st qtr 09 -2.99%

++ 28700 Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA Metropolitan Statistical Area
Principal Cities: Kingsport, TN; Bristol, TN; Bristol, VA
Hawkins County, TN; Sullivan County, TN; Scott County, VA; Washington County, VA; Bristol city, VA

Kingsport changes unemployment data to suit itself

March 6th, 2009 No comments

Jeff Fleming, Assistant City Manager for Economic Development for the City of Kingsport, TN just posted a post on his blog concerning the January unemployment rates.  Jeff Fleming is paid  $91,898 per year by the taxpayers of Kingsport and he finds time to point out how well other areas are doing or not doing so well in the unemployment area.  Jeff Fleming fails to mention anything about how Kingsport is doing and changes the State data to suit him. 

Below in Red, I have corrected Jeff Flemings post to reflect the State’s report and added data left out by Jeff Fleming for Kingsport, Bristol, and Johnson City. 

See link:  Tennessee – January 2009 Kingsport and Sullivan County Unemployment Rate, and Kingsport Times-News article; Kingsport’s January unemployment rate hits 10.5%, Morristown at 15.2%; Sullivan County has 4th lowest rate in state

Sullivan County has 3rd (4th) lowest unemployment rate in Tennessee

While the unemployment rate rose in all 95 of Tennessee’s counties, Sullivan County has the 3RD (4th) lowest unemployment rate and Washington County is 5th.
8.5% (7.6%) = U.S.
9.3% (8.6%) = State of Tennessee
6.9% = Sullivan County

Counties with lowest unemployment rates (out of 95 counties):

1.  (2.) Knox County (6.6%) – Knoxville
1. (1.) Lincoln County (6.6%) – Fayetteville
2. (3.) Williamson County (6.8%) – Franklin-Brentwood
3. (4.) Sullivan County (6.9%) – Kingsport-Bristol
4. (5.)Davidson County (7.0%) – Nashville
5. (6.) Washington County (7.4%) – Johnson City
5. (7.) Hamilton County (7.4%) – Chattanooga
6. (8.) Montgomery County (7.6%) – Clarksville

Other Cities of interest in the Tri-Cites area
10.5%  Kingsport
7.1%  Bristol
7.0%  Johnson City

Other counties of regional interest:

14.1% = Greene County (Greeneville)
13.8% = Cocke County (Newport)
12.6% = Sevier County (Sevierville-Gatlinburg-Pigeon Forge)
12.6% = Hancock County (Sneedville)
12.4% = Johnson County (Mountain City)
12.4% = Grainger County (Rutledge)
11.8% = Jefferson County (Jefferson City-Dandridge)
11.6% = Claiborne County (Tazewell)
11.3% = Campbell County (LaFollette-Jacksboro)
10.8% = Hawkins County (Church Hill-Mount Carmel-Rogersville)
10.4% = Hamblen County (Morristown)
9.5% = Unicoi County (Erwin)
9.5% = Union County (Maynardville)
9.2% = Blount County (Maryville-Alcoa)
9.1% = Carter County (Elizabethton)
8.4% = Anderson County (Oak Ridge-Clinton)

For additional reading, see the following link: Jeff Fleming

What do you think about this type of reporting?  Is it ok to put the political spin on to help the city?  Is this the ethical way of reporting?

Alderwoman Joh not telling the whole story

March 4th, 2009 No comments

Alderwoman Joh, who is running for re-election made a statement last night at the Kingsport Board of Mayor and Alderman meeting that is not exactly true.

Alderwoman Joh stated that 875 families have moved to Kingsport since July, 2008.  What she did not say is how many families have moved away and that the data included not only Kingsport but the surrounding areas.

I have written posts on this subject before.  See the following link for more information.  East Tennessee city steals data to enhance it’s image

East Tennessee city steals data to enhance it’s image

January 15th, 2009 No comments

Claims by the administration of Mayor Dennis Phillips in the City of Kingsport, Tennessee makes one wonder what really is the truth. There is a pattern of making statements that don’t exactly tell the true story.

A December 30, 2008 Kingsport Times-News article made the following statement below

“Fleming said Kingsport’s efforts are paying off, as more than 2,700 families from 44 states have moved here in the past two years.”

In the above statement by Kingsport’s Assistant City Manager, Jeff Fleming, at first glance, one might say that having 2,700 families move to Kingsport in the last two years is great success.

The 2000 U.S. Census states that there are 2.48 people per household in Kingsport and this would mean that the population of Kingsport increased by 6,696 people.

Using the Kingsport population in the table below, we see that in 2006, the population was 44,122.  Add the new residents(6,696), the total would be 50,818 population.  This would equate to 3.70 families moving to Kingsport everyday for the past two years.  If these numbers are true, Kingsport would need to set up some form of “tent city” because of lack of housing in the area.

In the table below we see that Kingsport population growth rate is –1.8% for years 2000 to 2007.

City Population Table

YearKingsportJohnson CityBristolGreenevilleMorristown
200045,12555,99825,39115,39226,292
200144,74156,15025,33915,31326,468
200244,57257,47125,33015,21026,268
200344,41057,64925,14015,15626,316
200444,08158,07124,97915,20126,490
200544,11459,10425,06715,27826,765
200644,12260,34825,24415,42027034
200744,43561,02825,47415,44627,432
% Growth 2000-2007-1.6%8.2%0.3%0.3%4.2%

On January 4, 2009, Jeff Fleming stated that “716 families from 34 states moved to Kingsport July-Dec 2008”.  Click on the link at the bottom of the post on the Kingsport! blog maintained by Kingsport’s Assistant City Manager Jeff Fleming and you will see that 600 families moved away from Kingsport during this period.

Now, we can see that the City of Kingsport is using data from other areas and hopes that people would take it as gospel.  But using data from other areas and not telling the full story unless you drill down to see how many people moved away, to me, is not honest.

The United States does not ride on the coattails of other countries. Tennessee does not rely on other States for better numbers/data and Sullivan County should also be only concerned about it’s own data or numbers.  Kingsport should get out of the business of stealing data from the surrounding areas to enhance it’s image.

The links below give information how the City of Kingsport uses data from other areas to enhance it’s image.

Kingsport, TN conveniently twists unemployment data

Blog reader debunks city claims

What are your views on this style of reporting by the city?  Leave a comment

Blog reader debunks city claims

January 12th, 2009 No comments

A blog reader who goes by the name of “Never Done” wrote a response about Assistant City Manager Jeff Fleming claims about the number of jobs in the Kingsport area.  This is another example of the City of Kingsport using data from the surrounding area to enhance it’s image.

But, I guess the city has to do something to ride on the coattails of other areas because of the City of Kingsport high unemployment rate of 7.2 percent for November, 2008

The City of Kingsport funded “Move to Kingsport” website lists a total of 114 jobs.  Not all of these jobs are from the Kingsport area.  They state on the  “Move To Kingsport” website, that the jobs database  is updated daily, and is is a coalition of the Kingsport Times-News and participating employers.  The 2,026 jobs that Jeff Fleming states that are available are a lot different from the “Move to Kingsport” database and the research that the blog reader conducted below.

Maybe this is Jeff Fleming’s way of saying, we want you to “Move to Kingsport”, but you may need to find work elsewhere because of our lack of jobs and our high unemployment rate.

Good research, “Never Done”!

As far as the labor portion of the economy in Kingsport it’s shaky because of the lack of diversity in employers (too heavy emphasis on retail and fast food), and the continual denial of economic problems in Kingsport.

Today’s (Jan 11th) Kingsport Time-News (maybe they should change their name to Kingsport Rah-Rah) has a most interesting poll asking how safe readers think their job is. As of this morning, 49% say their job is between somewhat and very safe.(they must work the city or the Kingsport Times-News) 51% believe their jobs are at risk, at great risk, or have lost their job (including me), which accounts for 51% or the respondents. How can this possibly be in such a booming, no problem city like Kingsport? Who believes the final results of the poll will be skewed to be more positive when it is complete? (…and likely used in a breathless e-mail announcing the large percentage of Kingsport residents who have no worries about losing their jobs.)

As an example of what seems to be the “official” view of the economy from those in charge of Kingsport, I offer the following: on December 30, Jeff Fleming sent out an e-mail titled “2,026 jobs advertised within 25 miles of Kingsport” and included a link to the job search (www.indeed.com) site the information was taken from. Guess he figured no one would ever check to see the jobs. Just accept the number and move along. But I checked, and found some interesting facts:

  1. Once again, he gloms onto neighboring jurisdictions when it can benefit. If you are pushing Kingsport, then use data for the city.
  2. The search used has no expiration date, so all jobs ever posted will display as far back as the server hosts.
  3. The site includes “jobs wanted”, military recruiting, “work at home” listings, and job training (such as driving schools, etc.)
  4. Numerous duplicate listings, especially the work at home scams listed on numerous dates.

Shouldn’t the facts be vetted and due diligence be done by those being paid to do this?

This is not a reliable site to get accurate information from, and I don’t why he didn’t use the Kingsport Times-News, as it would seem more likely to accurately reflect what is offered locally. At any rate, here’s some results found using the Indeed.com site and the Kingsport Times-News:

  1. Using the advanced search to find jobs in Kingsport only, it lists 200 jobs from the last 15 days. This of course includes the jobs wanted, work at home, etc.
  2. Today’s (Jan.11) Kingsport Times-News (www.tricityjobs.com) advertises 17 open jobs actually in Kingsport.

Both 17 and 200 are a far cry from over 2,000. I understand these guys are paid to put Kingsport in the best light, and that is important to do. But it’s okay to say times are tough and that Kingsport is not exempt from them. I believe the residents would respect them more, and indeed support them more, if they would acknowledge it and then work to improve the situation. That certainly requires more leadership than denying a problem exists.

Kingsport’s good old-boy network – you help my cause and I’ll help yours

January 4th, 2009 No comments

Kingsport, it’s seems likes to talk about all the success that it is experiencing, but one needs to ask the question, if Kingsport is doing all that well, then why don’t they use some of that money from that success and pay for projects instead of borrowing money.

It appears that this ramped up spinning started the day that Eastman Chemical announced the $100 million cost reduction.  Part of this cost reduction was that no Eastman Chemical employee would get wage/salary increases in 2009.

There has been many newspaper articles about this success lately and the Kingsport Times-News has announced that there will be many more to come.  Some of the newspaper articles are poorly researched and it is very clear to this blogger, that the author of the newspaper is not doing investigative reporting.  It appears that the newspaper is taking the City of Kingsport word as the gospel.

An example of spinning data was reported by Jeff Fleming, Kingsport Assistant City Manager, that the Kingsport area (Sullivan County) had the 3rd best unemployment rate in Tennessee.  What Jeff Fleming conveniently failed to do is mention that the City of Kingsport rate was 7.2 percent.  You can check it out yourself by going to the link: Kingsport Area = 3rd Lowest Unemployment in Tennessee.  The first part of the post that Jeff Fleming is the press release from the State of Tennessee.  The percentages posted at the bottom are from Jeff Fleming’s selected extraction of data from the Tennessee numbers.  Also, see previous post on a citizen reaction to City of Kingsport claims and Tennessee – November 2008 Unemployment rate for Tri-Cities area.

There may be a concern in the City of Kingsport about the public perception of the Tax, Borrow, and Spend label that has been given to city leaders.  It is quite possible that the “spin” the city has been doing lately is to justify all the spending.

Also, it is an election year where four Board of Mayor and Alderman positions are up for grabs.

The Kingsport Times-News is a willing participant in the spin on how great things are going.  But, one needs to look at the role of the top two management positions at the newspaper.  Keith Wilson who is the publisher and Ted Como as editor are not exactly innocent and unbiased bystanders.

These two newspaper people are deeply involved with the City of Kingsport and economic development in the region.  You could do a goggle search on Keith Wilson and Ted Como to see for yourself their involvement in local government affairs.

It is difficult if not impossible to find a politician, whether early in their career or a political office veteran, who has not given in to political pressure, special interest groups, lobbyists, or the good-old-boy-network practice of you-help-my-cause-and-I’ll-help-yours

There is nothing wrong about talking about success, but please cut out the spinning of data.

A Blog reader’s reaction to Kingsport, TN twist on unemployment data

December 24th, 2008 No comments

There was a comment made on this blog by a person that goes by the name “Never Done”.  This commenter has made many comments on this blog and his comments are well stated and almost always hits the nail on the head.  I value his comments and below is a comment that he made and the research he did on his own.  He came up with the same conclusion as I did in a previous post.

I wanted to bring the comment below up front and center stage so everyone could see what is happening.  The City of Kingsport needs to realize that the citizens are smarter and can see the spin on the unemployment numbers.

Never Done said…

Kingsport’s unemployment rate is 7.2%! This morning in the Official Kingsport Spin e-mail, the city employee who sends it out gives it a title that Kingsport has the 3rd lowest unemployment rate in the state of TN. He even includes a link to the gvt document, apparently thinking no one would look it up for themselves.

If you look at the document, the so-called #3 ranking is for all of Sullivan County, not for the city of Kingsport. The report breaks down the unemployment rate for the 25 cities in TN that have a population of 25,000 or more, and Kingsport is #13 out of 25, with a rate of 7.2%. Of the Tri-Cities, Kingsport is behind Johnson City (5.7%) and Bristol (5.6%).

However, the false e-mail has been published and has been picked up by other blogs and such and has made it to Google Alerts which helps spread the misinformation.

Those in charge of leading Kingsport really do seem to be in denial of what is happening with the city’s and the nation’s economy. It is imperative that the citizens of Kingsport get the true facts and hold those in charge accountable. If city leaders are so concerned that the truth is not helpful to the image of the city, then they need to take appropriate actions to correct the problems, not twist them to their liking to hide unfavorable information.

Standing in a garden and repeating over and over “there are no weeds” doesn’t make the weeds go away. You have to admit they are there, work to remove them and keep working to keep them out.

Below, is a correction for the Jeff Fleming Blog.  I have added in red below the unemployment rate for Kingsport that was conveniently left out.

Regional Unemployment Rates (Nov 2008):

  • 5.1% = Sullivan County (Kingsport-Bristol)
  • 5.6% = Washington County (Johnson City)
  • 5.6% = KNOXVILLE METRO
  • 5.8% = KINGSPORT-BRISTOL METRO
  • 5.9% = TRI-CITIES COMBINED METRO
  • 6.1% = JOHNSON CITY METRO
  • 6.7% = U.S. AVERAGE
  • 6.8% = Hawkins County (Church Hill-Mt Carmel-Rogersville)
  • 6.8% = Carter County (Elizabethton)
  • 6.8% = Sevier County (Sevierville-Pigeon Forge-Gatlinburg)
  • 6.9% = STATE OF TENNESSEE
  • 7.1% = Unicoi County (Erwin)
  • 7.2% = Kingsport
  • 7.5% = Hamblen County (Morristown)
  • 7.8% = Jefferson County (Jefferson City)
  • 8.1% = Johnson County (Mountain City)
  • 8.5% = Grainger County (Rutledge)
  • 8.6% = Hancock County (Sneedville)
  • 8.8% = Cocke County (Newport)
  • 9.1% = Greene County (Greeneville)

Kingsport, TN conveniently twists unemployment data

December 24th, 2008 No comments

There is a blog that uses the same November 2008 unemployment data as I have, but does not tell the full story and is in fact misleading.  This blog is run by Jeff Fleming, Assistant City Manager for Development for the City of Kingsport, Tennessee.

There is a post on this blog that has the title “Kingsport Area = 3rd Lowest Unemployment Rate in Tennessee” .  What Jeff Fleming conveniently fails to do, is mention that Kingsport’s unemployment rate is 7.2 percent. This is an example of putting the “spin” on the data and riding on the coattails of better numbers in Sullivan County.   The Sullivan County unemployment rate is 5.1 percent

I would like to suggest to Jeff Fleming the following title for his post.  “Kingsport has the highest unemployment rate in the Tri-Cities area.”

To see the state data yourself, go to the following link November 2008.  Page 6 has the information for Kingsport.

I would like to thank a reader of this blog for pointing this discrepancy out.

You Report It!If you have anything to report concerning the City of Kingsport, Tennessee Government, feel free to use the email icon below to report it.  Issues such as wasteful spending, local elections, annexation, ethics, crime, conflicts of interest, backroom deals, open government, etc., are examples to report, but not limited to those listed.