Archive

Archive for the ‘Elected Officials’ Category

The Kiplinger Study Kingsport Area Elected Officials Would Like to Keep Quiet

August 3rd, 2010 5 comments

imageKiplinger’s Personal Finance recently published a list of Best Cities for the Next Decade.

Learn more about how they picked the Best Cities for the Next Decade.

Also they published a list  367 U.S. metropolitan areas that can be sorted and ranked by different criteria.

In the example below, all metro areas in Tennessee have been extracted.  The table below was sorted by median household income.  We see that the Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA has the lowest median household income for the Tennessee metro areas ranked and also has a higher cost of living than the other Tennessee metro areas listed below.

Furthermore, Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA median household income rank is 353 out of a total of 367 U.S. metro areas.  This shows that there were 14 metro areas that had a lower median household income than the Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA metro area.

Click here for the entire list of 367 metro areas from Kiplinger.  The list can be sorted online or downloaded in spreadsheet format.  Click here to see the Kiplinger data sorted by “Median Household Income for all Metro Areas”

I am sure that our local City, County, and State elected officials will want to keep this data from getting out.

RankMetro AreaPopulationCost of Living IndexPercentage of Workforce in Creative ClassMedian Household IncomeSalary GrowthEmployment Growth
120Nashville-Davidson–Murfreesboro, TN1,518,97188.732.7$49,9793.22%2.52%
214Clarksville, TN-KY258,50888.7824.4$44,5313.55%0.97%
216Knoxville, TN680,44489.3326.9$44,5113.23%0.69%
218Memphis, TN-MS-AR1,278,63486.7537.5$44,4952.64%1.17%
253Chattanooga, TN-GA512,32788.6626.7$42,8012.75%0.61%
324Cleveland, TN110,79291.2127.7$38,6053.14%0.80%
329Jackson, TN112,35790.5224.6$38,3526.05%4.25%
337Morristown, TN134,02688.89n/a$37,3681.48%-0.38%
342Johnson City, TN193,45788.8330.2$36,8532.07%1.85%
353Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA302,99710030.9$36,0173.05%0.81%

Sullivan County, TN Highway Employees Indicted

July 21st, 2010 No comments

Alen Pope Dave Campbell Nashville, TN- The Tennessee Bureau of Investigation today arrested the Sullivan County Highway Commissioner and Department Section Foreman on multiple charges after they were indicted by the Sullivan County Grand Jury yesterday.

Sullivan County Highway Commissioner Allan Pope (left picture), 60, 3273 Ridgeview, Kingsport, TN was indicted on seven counts in five separate cases. Charges include one count of theft over $10,000, four counts of theft over $1,000, one count of official misconduct and one count of private use of county equipment.

Sullivan County Highway Department Section Foreman David Campbell (right picture), 60, 244 Clearbranch Circle, Blountville, TN was indicted on eight counts in six separate cases. The charges against him include one count of theft over $10,000, four counts of theft over $1,000, two counts of official misconduct and one count of private use of county equipment.

While working for the county highway department, both Pope and Campbell had work performed on several different private properties at the county’s expense. The incidents occurred at various times as early as November 2006 through March of 2010. Services diverted included performing improvements to real property, filling in a water line ditch and providing a truck load of free gravel. The work was performed at various locations along Graybeal Road, Muddy Creek Road/Brown Circle, Hawley Road, Rice Cross Road and Brookley Drive. The TBI open the case in March of 2010 at the request of the District Attorney General.

Both Pope and Campbell were booked into the Sullivan County Jail on $10,000 bond each.

See the following links for more information.

Past and New Direction of the No WhiteWash! Blog

September 3rd, 2009 No comments

This blog was started in February 2007 with the title of “Kingsport, TN Government”.  The name was later changed to “No WhiteWash!”, a name less focused on one local government.  We are still focused on Kingsport, TN Government and have expanded into issues that affect Sullivan County, North East Tennessee area, and the State as they are in a lot of case interrelated.

The direction of this blog for the future will be for the average citizen and not the elites who choose to run things for their own self-interest.  There will be no favoritism toward a political party in this blog.  WARNING:  If you are a elected official or running for office and make statements that you can’t back up or not exactly telling the full story, then this blog will expose them.  If you are running for office or an elected official who wants to use this blog for political advantage, then I would suggest you go elsewhere to peddle your story.  This blog is for the people!!

This little blog now has readership that is around 1,000 visits per day and that number could be much higher because other blogs re-publish this blog posts to their blogs.  There have been over 1,700 posts written in this blog since inception and the posts are not forgotten as they slide down the page as newer post take their place on the first page.  The search traffic coming to this blog is very large because this blog posts are indexed on all of the major search engines (Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, etc).  All of the posts go into a RSS news feed where readers can read the posts without having to visit the blog.  The folks using the RSS feed amounts to many hundred per day.

Over the last few years I have seen more local people become more vocal about expressing their views concerning how the local governments operate.  They express their views in the comments areas in the local newspapers, blogs, social media sites (Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, etc)  There have been many local blogs that have been started in the North East Tennessee area in the last few years and I think we will see more of it.

Blogs do get a lot of readership.  The Tea Party protests got their start from blogs and with very little help from local media.

The Show blog is another local blog that has come online and also has it own local talk radio show on Monday and Thursday from 6-8pm on WMCH AM1260.  Local issues are discussed in this radio talk show and in many cases the posts from this blog are discussed and the radio talk show does allow callers to phone in and express their views. 

I have learned much about the City of Kingsport government on how they operate.  The research that I have done has me very concerned about how the “elites” control the city and do things that are in their self-interests.  I do have a concern about their lack to fully understand the problems the area has such as low median wages, declining population, high unemployment, lack of good paying jobs, and young adults leaving the area to find work, etc.

I also have a concern how the mayor selects political appointees to serve on different committees so he can be assured that he get what he wants.  The reporting in the Kingsport Times-News is almost always, in my view, protecting the city officials.  One has to understand that if they reported anything negative about the city, then it would reflect on the upper management at the Kingsport Times-News.  This is because there are many of the top management at the Times-News that are Mayor Dennis Phillips’ political appointees.

We could go on about how certain people decide who should run for political office and then campaign for them and put up the money for them to get elected.

We could talk about the Ridgefield County Club elites or look at the details of the spending of city money by the Kingsport Chamber of Commerce, but these could be posts for another day.

There have been many that have sent this blog information concerning the operation of our local governments and I want to say thank you.  Please continue reporting as you have in the past.

If you have anything to report concerning the below areas, feel free to use the email icon below to report it. The source of the information will be kept confidential.

  • City of Kingsport, TN
  • City of Bristol, TN
  • Sullivan County, TN
  • North East, TN
  • Tennessee Government

Issues such as wasteful spending, local elections, annexation, ethics, crime, conflicts of interest, backroom deals, open government, abuse of taxpayer money, etc., are examples to report, but not limited to those listed.

North East TN Republican Controlled County in Trouble

August 30th, 2009 No comments

Update: This blog has sent the post below to 83 people via email or U.S.Mail that are in the list below.

Kingsport Board of Mayor and Alderman
Mayor of Sullivan County
Sullivan County Commissioners
Bristol City Council
Bluff City Mayor and Alderman
Kingsport Chamber of Commerce
Tennessee Legislators for North East TN
U.S. Congress Legislators for North East TN
Commissioner Matt Kisber- TN Economic & Community Development
Governor Phil Bredesen
Tennessee Candidates for Governor
NETWORKS Sullivan Partnership Board of Directors and Members


Below is a graph and data table that shows the 1980-2005 actual populations and the projections for the years 2010-2030 for the eleven largest counties in Tennessee.  The data below will show that the estimated population in year 2030 will be less than it was in 1980 for Sullivan County.

I am sure that the past and current elected leaders will want this graph and the facts below to disappear because it reflects on their lack of response to address the problem with Sullivan County and its cities in its declining population and other problems in the Sullivan County area.  This blog will continue to expose the facts and there will be ”No Spin” and “No WhiteWash! of the data presented on this blog.

    Top Eleven Largest Counties Population – 1980 to 2030

Data for the graph and the table below is from the following links State and County Population and Population Projections for the State of Tennessee

Other Facts
  • In 1980, Sullivan County was the fifth largest county and it is estimated that in 2030, Sullivan County will be the eleventh largest county.
  • The population of Sullivan County is an older population and the median age for Sullivan County is 42.9 years, Tennessee is 37.2 years and Florida is 39.8 years.  The Percent 65 Years and Over for Kingsport is 20.1%, Bristol is 19.5%, Sullivan County is 17.8% and Florida is 17.4%.
  • Sullivan County and its cities, (Kingsport and Bristol) have a large number of young adults leaving the area.
  • The death rate for Sullivan County is more than the birth rate.
  • Sullivan County birth rate is low as compared to the state.
  • Sullivan County only gained 852 people between years 2000 to 2008 which gave a net gain of 0.56 percent growth.
  • Average Household median income is low for the area.  Kingsport is $34,391, Bristol is $36,454, and Sullivan County is $37,559. Two people in the same household making the new Federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour would make $30,160 per year.
  • The percent of poverty for those 65 and older in Sullivan County, TN is 12.2%, Kingsport is 11.6%, and Bristol is 16.2%. These percentages are 2007 numbers and could be higher due to the recession.  The household median income for 65 and older in Sullivan County is $28,070.
  • The poverty level for Kingsport is 18%, Bristol is 14.6%, and Sullivan County is 15.8%.  These percentages are 2007 numbers and could be higher due to the recession.  Poverty level for 2009 is defined for a person’s income to be $10,830 per year.
  • Kiplinger’s Personal Finance survey rates the Kingsport MSA as having the highest cost of living, low median income and the worst job growth out of 10 major cities/metro areas in Tennessee.
  • The area unemployment is high with Kingsport having the highest unemployment – See link for more details Jobs/Unemployment
  • The Republican Party has continuously controlled Tennessee’s 1st Congressional District since 1881.  It appears for the most part that most of the new jobs are going to the more Democrat Party area.
  • Kingsport has publicly stated that they would like to make Kingsport a destination city for visitors to the area while not addressing the real problems the area faces.  Spending the tax payers’ money to obtain a short-cut to generate revenue, in my view, does not help the average citizen. Spending money for a conference center expansion and aquatic center will not solve the area’s problems.  The aquatic center will not make any difference when one needs a job and there is not one available locally.  By the same token, if a job exists in the area and you need it badly, then the aquatic center does not enter the picture.
  • The area has one of the largest employers (Eastman Chemical) in the state and a major tourist attraction (Bristol Nascar Race).  It appears that the elected leaders have become complacent about finding new good paying jobs because these two businesses have not increased the population and/or stopped the exit of young adults leaving the area.
  • Kingsport is the largest city in Sullivan County and is proud of its reputation for having good schools.  Dobyns-Bennett High School has been named by Newsweek magazine as one of the top high schools in the country.  Having great schools apparently is not enough to keep the young adults from leaving the area in search of good paying jobs.
  • Kingsport has built a Higher Education Center, but I have a concern that there will not be the needed jobs in the area for those who finish their education.  I am for education, but with the large number of students, and with nothing major coming in as far as jobs, many will leave to look elsewhere for jobs.  Increasing the percentage of college graduates in the area is good, but the percentage of college graduates might be skewed because of the number of college educated young people leaving the area and the fact that the large percentage of older folks that do not have higher education.
  • It appears that local cities are striving to get new retail business into the area as an easy way to increase revenue.  Having retail is a quick way to get revenue, but as retail increases in a given city, then the share that retailers gets decreases because they have to share retail sales among many retailers.  I think a better approach would be to increase the flow of money into the area via good paying jobs, which would  provide for longer term stability for these retailers and this will also increase the standard of living for city/county citizens.
  • Because of declining revenues or increased spending, cities in Sullivan County have chosen to annex new areas for the tax revenue, increase their population, and to enable the city to borrow more because of the increased asset value.  This helps the cities, but decreases the already low standard of living for the citizens.
Conclusion

The facts presented above may concern some that bringing out these issues will cause folks or businesses to avoid the North East Tennessee area.  The facts presented above are available to anyone who desires to do research.  I am sure that any large company would do their research before deciding to invest in Sullivan County.  I also feel that “enough is enough” and the issues need to be up-front and center stage to be addressed.  No more hiding the issues….deal with them head on so the region will begin to respond economically. Good paying jobs in my view is what is needed to restore what has been lost.

    There must be lots of jobs and a few hundred will not do.  It should be a broad mix of jobs that would be attractive to different types of workers who have different skills or educational training.
    We need elected officials that will not cater to special interests groups or use get rich quick schemes to get revenue into the local government.  Get the money flowing into the area via good paying jobs and then the region might become attractive to those job seekers. The current and past economic development efforts are not working and efforts need to be stepped up and action is needed now.  If the economic development people are not capable of delivering results, then they need to be replaced.  If local politics are hindering the economic development efforts, then that needs to be exposed and addressed.
    If you are an elected official or economic development person and your views or lack of vision is holding up the region from rebounding, then you need to step aside.
What you can do?
Comments are Welcome

Please feel free to add comments via this blog

Top Tennessee Counties Ranked on Eight Different Criteria

August 2nd, 2009 No comments

Below is a series of ranking tables that compares the top 20 Tennessee counties that had the largest retail sales in 2008.  The top 20 counties listed below had retail sales that were $71,443,928,487 out of a total $90,007,566,528 for all 95 counties.  The entire data set can be viewed for all counties at this link:  2008 Retail Sales

Sullivan County is highlighted because of its declining population, low median wages, and young adults leaving Sullivan County.  The major cities in Sullivan County are Kingsport and Bristol. Sullivan County has one of the largest private employers in the state (Eastman Chemical) and as well as the Bristol Nascar race.

The tables below will  show that there are many counties that are doing much better than Sullivan County without having an Eastman Chemical or the Bristol races.

The problems as I see it have been ongoing for several decades. As an elected leader or involved in economic development, is this something that you are proud of?  This blog will continue to point out the problems and if elected leaders fail to respond to the problems….at least the world will know about Sullivan County.  The bottom line is that the Northeast Tennessee needs good paying jobs!!

Sullivan County has a history of being controlled by Republicans.  It just might be that this may be the problem.  Maybe we need Democratic leadership to get something done.

Also in Table 1 are links for the county websites.  Some county web pages are well done and project a good image for the county and some are rather plain and are lacking in information such as access to public documents (minutes, etc.).  You can be the judge as to which counties have the best website by clicking on the links below in Table 1.

Table 1

CountyRankPopulation
Shelby1906,825
Davidson2626,144
Knox3430,019
Hamilton4332,848
Rutherford5249,270
Williamson6171,452
Sumner7155,474
Montgomery8154,756
Sullivan9153,900
Blount10121,511
Washington11118,639
Wilson12109,803
Bradley1396,472
Madison1496,376
Sevier1584,835
Maury1681,938
Anderson1774,169
Putnam1871,160
Hamblen1962,132
Coffee2052,134
Table 2

CountyRankMedian Household Income
Williamson1$84,205
Wilson2$60,503
Sumner3$52,970
Rutherford4$50,623
Montgomery5$49,248
Blount6$46,009
Knox7$45,309
Maury8$44,990
Davidson9$44,486
Hamilton10$44,384
Shelby11$43,512
Anderson12$41,346
Bradley13$39,761
Madison14$39,721
Sevier15$39,534
Washington16$39,238
Hamblen17$37,661
Sullivan18$37,559
Coffee19$37,076
Putnam20$34,923

The top 20 counties below in Table 3 had retail sales that were  $71,443,928,487 out of $90,007,566,528 for all 95 counties.  The entire data set can be viewed for all counties at this link:  2008 Retail Sales

Nine counties did better than Sullivan County in the Retail Sales per Person column and four of them were in East Tennessee.

Table 3

CountyRankRetail Sales 2008
Davidson1$13,865,135,945
Shelby2$12,865,439,968
Knox3$8,693,885,896
Hamilton4$5,438,410,222
Rutherford5$5,236,379,546
Williamson6$3,586,964,710
Sullivan7$2,620,209,989
Washington8$2,074,933,033
Montgomery9$2,023,611,739
Sevier10$1,991,799,739
Madison11$1,890,155,368
Blount12$1,627,066,213
Sumner13$1,545,933,314
Putnam14$1,325,563,626
Wilson15$1,323,786,540
Hamblen16$1,322,352,772
Bradley17$1,204,829,952
Maury18$1,022,426,600
Anderson19$990,798,125
Coffee20$794,245,190
Table 4

CountyRankRetail Sales Per Person
Sevier1$23,479
Davidson2$22,144
Hamblen3$21,283
Rutherford4$21,007
Williamson5$20,921
Knox6$20,217
Madison7$19,612
Putnam8$18,628
Washington9$17,489
Sullivan10$17,025
Hamilton11$16,339
Coffee12$15,235
Shelby13$14,187
Blount14$13,390
Anderson15$13,359
Montgomery16$13,076
Bradley17$12,489
Maury18$12,478
Wilson19$12,056
Sumner20$9,943

Tables 5 and 6 below show the Estimated Current Property Values for the counties and shows how strong the property taxes are for a county.  The property values below include industrial and commercial, residential, farms, etc.

The property vales used in table 5 were taken from the 2008 Tax Aggregate Report of Tennessee.  The Estimated Current Property Value column in Table 5 includes the county and municipalities property values and are added together for one property value for the county in Table 5.

Williamson and Sevier Counties are clearly the big winners in Table 6. Washington County which does not have an Eastman Chemical but has more Property Value per Person than Sullivan County and is a smaller county in square miles.

In the above Tables 3 and 4, Bradley County rank was 17 for both retail sales and retail sales per person.  In Table 6, Bradley County has a rank of 5 and would indicate a strong manufacturing base.  Also Bradley County will be getting the $1 billion Wacker Chemie AG plant which will employ 500 – 600 people.

Hemlock Semiconductor Corp.,  plans to build a $1.2 billion facility near Clarksville (Montgomery County). That project is expected to open in 2012 and create 800 jobs.

Volkswagen plans to employ about 2,000 workers and invest about $1 billion in Chattanooga.

Eastman Chemical and the Bristol Nascar Races have been good for Sullivan County, but in my opinion the county, Kingsport, and Bristol have relied on it for far too long and have become complacent when it comes to economic development.

Table 5

CountyRankEstimated
Current
Property Value
Shelby1$122,116,400,578
Davidson2$105,301,418,705
Williamson3$55,812,256,667
Knox4$45,660,993,815
Hamilton5$44,738,981,752
Rutherford6$32,255,317,944
Sumner7$24,112,350,451
Sevier8$21,230,869,507
Sullivan9$18,976,725,006
Montgomery10$16,958,166,077
Blount11$16,469,522,914
Washington12$15,481,178,675
Bradley14$14,101,364,762
Wilson13$14,101,364,762
Madison15$11,024,153,912
Maury16$9,291,004,712
Anderson17$8,804,923,113
Putnam18$7,450,597,543
Hamblen19$7,328,642,509
Coffee20$5,428,259,549
Table 6

CountyRankProperty Value Per Person
Williamson1$325,527
Sevier2$250,260
Davidson3$168,174
Sumner4$155,089
Bradley5$146,170
Blount6$135,539
Shelby7$134,663
Hamilton8$134,412
Washington9$130,489
Rutherford10$129,399
Wilson11$128,424
Sullivan12$123,305
Anderson13$118,714
Hamblen14$117,952
Madison15$114,386
Maury16$113,390
Montgomery17$109,580
Knox18$106,183
Putnam19$104,702
Coffee20$104,121

Sullivan County in Table 7 has the worst rank of the top 2 retail sales counties for population growth.  Over an eight year period from years 2000 to 2008, Sullivan County only gained 850 in population.

Sullivan County death rate is higher than the birth rate and the county gained only 850 in population in the time span of 2000 to 2008.  The gain has come from new arrivals to the area.

Sullivan County is considered one of the larger populated counties in Tennessee.  In 1994, Sullivan County was the fifth most populated county.  Because of the growth in other counties and the declining population in Sullivan County, the rank of Sullivan County is estimated to be 11 in year 2030

Table 7

CountyRankPopulation % Change, 2000 to 2008
Rutherford139.94%
Williamson236.94%
Wilson323.64%
Sevier419.20%
Sumner519.18%
Maury617.90%
Montgomery714.83%
Blount814.82%
Putnam914.20%
Knox1012.56%
Washington1110.67%
Davidson129.87%
Bradley139.67%
Coffee148.58%
Hamilton158.10%
Hamblen166.89%
Madison174.94%
Anderson183.98%
Shelby191.04%
Sullivan200.56%
Table 8

CountyLand Area Sq MilesRankPersons Per Sq Mile
Davidson50211247
Shelby75521201
Knox5083846
Hamilton5424614
Rutherford6195403
Hamblen1616386
Sullivan4137373
Washington3268364
Williamson5839294
Sumner52910294
Bradley32911293
Montgomery53912287
Anderson33813219
Blount55914217
Wilson57115192
Putnam40116177
Madison55717173
Sevier59218143
Maury61319134
Coffee42920122

All data used in the above tables are from the links highlighted above in blue.

Household Median Income for Tennessee Counties

July 30th, 2009 No comments

Below is the household median income for the top 20 Tennessee Counties that had the largest retail sales.  The household median income is for the county and may be different for cities within the county.  Below is the household median Income for Sullivan County cities

Kingsport  $34,391  – Individuals below poverty level 18.0%

Bristol  $36,454 – Individuals below poverty level 14.6%

Sullivan County – Individuals below poverty level 15.8%


CountyRankHousehold Median Income
Williamson1$84,205
Wilson2$60,503
Sumner3$52,970
Rutherford4$50,623
Montgomery5$49,248
Blount6$46,009
Knox7$45,309
Maury8$44,990
Davidson9$44,486
Hamilton10$44,384
Shelby11$43,512
Anderson12$41,346
Bradley13$39,761
Madison14$39,721
Sevier15$39,534
Washington16$39,238
Hamblen17$37,661
Sullivan18$37,559
Coffee19$37,076
Putnam20$34,923

 

Below is the household income distribution for Kingsport and the household median income for Kingsport is $34,391.  In the graph below there are 2,636 people who are living in poverty.

 

The 2009 Poverty Guidelines for the 48 Contiguous States and the District of Columbia

Persons in familyPoverty guideline
1$10,830
2$14,570
3$18,310
4$22,050
5$25,790
6$29,530
7$33,270
8$37,010

For families with more than 8 persons, add $3,740 for each additional person.

 

Young adults continue to leave Sullivan County, TN

July 29th, 2009 No comments

I would be embarrassed to be a current or past elected leader or those having been responsible for economic development in Sullivan County, Kingsport, and Bristol Tennessee.  The ongoing problem of several decades with the young adults leaving the area and the fact that Sullivan County and its cities have an older population has not been addressed to stop the pattern of a declining population.

I am sure that our elected leaders would not want to publicly discuss this subject, but this blog will continue to make the public aware of the situation.  In my opinion, having a company like Eastman Chemical and the Bristol Nascar Race is good for the area, but having them has made the area complacent and the leaders have not done enough to get other good paying jobs here.

There may be some who may be wondering why approach this subject because of the negative impact it may have on future people moving to the area.  My answer is that there are about two decades of not addressing this problem with results.  Enough is enough!!  Let’s get it out front and center so the citizens/leaders can understand the problems and find solutions.

The graph below is from the State of Tennessee and gives a comparison for Sullivan County against Tennessee.  The time span for the graph is from 1990 to 2000 and shows that Sullivan did lag behind in the number of young people residing in the county.  Note in the graph that it appears that the age bracket 18-24 shows that our young folks are leaving the area and the age bracket 25-44 only had a 0.1% increase.  The 65 and over age bracket in Sullivan County did better than the state with a 19.1 percent increase.

The last line in the graph gives the county rank and Sullivan County did not fare well.  In the 18-24 age bracket, Sullivan County came in as having the worst rank of all 95 counties in the state.  The 65 and over age bracket gave Sullivan County a better rank of 28.

Population Growth Rate (1990 to 2000) was 6.6% which gave Sullivan County a rank of 90 out of 95 counties.  The growth rate for years 2000- 2008 is .56%

*A rank of 1 indicates the best condition.

Population Growth by Age Bracket, 1990 to 2000

Using more current data from the U.S. Census shows that Sullivan County and its cities have a low birth rate, young adults are still leaving the area, high median age and a high percentage of older adults age 65 and over.

The age distribution graph below on the left shows that Kingsport has a greater number of young adults leaving the area and has more older adults.

The graph on the right compares Tennessee, Florida, and Sullivan County.  Most folks have an impression that Florida has a lot of retirement-age people, but Sullivan County has a larger percentage of older adults.

Percent 65 Years and Over

  • Kingsport, Tennessee  20.1
  • Bristol, Tennessee  19.5
  • Sullivan County, Tennessee  17.8
  • Florida  17.4

Median Age

  • Bristol, Tennessee  43.2
  • Sullivan County, Tennessee  42.9
  • Kingsport, Tennessee  42.6
  • Florida  39.8

2005-2007 age distribution data from U. S. Census

The City of Kingsport uses a method of water meter turn on and off to keep track of its movement in the population.  This method is flawed since the young adults are more likely living with their parents and would not be picked up by the water meter method when they leave the area.

Sullivan County death rate is higher than the birth rate and the county gained only 850 in population in the time span of 2000 to 2008.  The gain has come from new arrivals to the area.

Sullivan County is considered one of the larger populated counties in Tennessee.  In 1994, Sullivan County was the fifth most populated county.  Because of the growth in other counties and the declining population in Sullivan County, the rank of Sullivan County is estimated to be 11 in year 2030.

Elections Administrator Gena Frye Ousted

April 15th, 2009 No comments

Amid allegations it violated Tennessee’s open meetings law and engaged in a “back-room deal,” the Sullivan County Election Commission voted 3-2 along party lines Tuesday to fire the county’s longtime elections administrator, a Democrat, and replace her with the county’s GOP chairman.

Republican election commissioners ousted Gena Frye after 13 years and appointed Jason Booher, an insurance salesman in Bristol, Va.

Read more via Elections Administrator Gena Frye Ousted | TriCities.