Archive

Archive for the ‘Economic Development’ Category

Top Tennessee Counties Ranked on Eight Different Criteria

August 2nd, 2009 No comments

Below is a series of ranking tables that compares the top 20 Tennessee counties that had the largest retail sales in 2008.  The top 20 counties listed below had retail sales that were $71,443,928,487 out of a total $90,007,566,528 for all 95 counties.  The entire data set can be viewed for all counties at this link:  2008 Retail Sales

Sullivan County is highlighted because of its declining population, low median wages, and young adults leaving Sullivan County.  The major cities in Sullivan County are Kingsport and Bristol. Sullivan County has one of the largest private employers in the state (Eastman Chemical) and as well as the Bristol Nascar race.

The tables below will  show that there are many counties that are doing much better than Sullivan County without having an Eastman Chemical or the Bristol races.

The problems as I see it have been ongoing for several decades. As an elected leader or involved in economic development, is this something that you are proud of?  This blog will continue to point out the problems and if elected leaders fail to respond to the problems….at least the world will know about Sullivan County.  The bottom line is that the Northeast Tennessee needs good paying jobs!!

Sullivan County has a history of being controlled by Republicans.  It just might be that this may be the problem.  Maybe we need Democratic leadership to get something done.

Also in Table 1 are links for the county websites.  Some county web pages are well done and project a good image for the county and some are rather plain and are lacking in information such as access to public documents (minutes, etc.).  You can be the judge as to which counties have the best website by clicking on the links below in Table 1.

Table 1

CountyRankPopulation
Shelby1906,825
Davidson2626,144
Knox3430,019
Hamilton4332,848
Rutherford5249,270
Williamson6171,452
Sumner7155,474
Montgomery8154,756
Sullivan9153,900
Blount10121,511
Washington11118,639
Wilson12109,803
Bradley1396,472
Madison1496,376
Sevier1584,835
Maury1681,938
Anderson1774,169
Putnam1871,160
Hamblen1962,132
Coffee2052,134
Table 2

CountyRankMedian Household Income
Williamson1$84,205
Wilson2$60,503
Sumner3$52,970
Rutherford4$50,623
Montgomery5$49,248
Blount6$46,009
Knox7$45,309
Maury8$44,990
Davidson9$44,486
Hamilton10$44,384
Shelby11$43,512
Anderson12$41,346
Bradley13$39,761
Madison14$39,721
Sevier15$39,534
Washington16$39,238
Hamblen17$37,661
Sullivan18$37,559
Coffee19$37,076
Putnam20$34,923

The top 20 counties below in Table 3 had retail sales that were  $71,443,928,487 out of $90,007,566,528 for all 95 counties.  The entire data set can be viewed for all counties at this link:  2008 Retail Sales

Nine counties did better than Sullivan County in the Retail Sales per Person column and four of them were in East Tennessee.

Table 3

CountyRankRetail Sales 2008
Davidson1$13,865,135,945
Shelby2$12,865,439,968
Knox3$8,693,885,896
Hamilton4$5,438,410,222
Rutherford5$5,236,379,546
Williamson6$3,586,964,710
Sullivan7$2,620,209,989
Washington8$2,074,933,033
Montgomery9$2,023,611,739
Sevier10$1,991,799,739
Madison11$1,890,155,368
Blount12$1,627,066,213
Sumner13$1,545,933,314
Putnam14$1,325,563,626
Wilson15$1,323,786,540
Hamblen16$1,322,352,772
Bradley17$1,204,829,952
Maury18$1,022,426,600
Anderson19$990,798,125
Coffee20$794,245,190
Table 4

CountyRankRetail Sales Per Person
Sevier1$23,479
Davidson2$22,144
Hamblen3$21,283
Rutherford4$21,007
Williamson5$20,921
Knox6$20,217
Madison7$19,612
Putnam8$18,628
Washington9$17,489
Sullivan10$17,025
Hamilton11$16,339
Coffee12$15,235
Shelby13$14,187
Blount14$13,390
Anderson15$13,359
Montgomery16$13,076
Bradley17$12,489
Maury18$12,478
Wilson19$12,056
Sumner20$9,943

Tables 5 and 6 below show the Estimated Current Property Values for the counties and shows how strong the property taxes are for a county.  The property values below include industrial and commercial, residential, farms, etc.

The property vales used in table 5 were taken from the 2008 Tax Aggregate Report of Tennessee.  The Estimated Current Property Value column in Table 5 includes the county and municipalities property values and are added together for one property value for the county in Table 5.

Williamson and Sevier Counties are clearly the big winners in Table 6. Washington County which does not have an Eastman Chemical but has more Property Value per Person than Sullivan County and is a smaller county in square miles.

In the above Tables 3 and 4, Bradley County rank was 17 for both retail sales and retail sales per person.  In Table 6, Bradley County has a rank of 5 and would indicate a strong manufacturing base.  Also Bradley County will be getting the $1 billion Wacker Chemie AG plant which will employ 500 – 600 people.

Hemlock Semiconductor Corp.,  plans to build a $1.2 billion facility near Clarksville (Montgomery County). That project is expected to open in 2012 and create 800 jobs.

Volkswagen plans to employ about 2,000 workers and invest about $1 billion in Chattanooga.

Eastman Chemical and the Bristol Nascar Races have been good for Sullivan County, but in my opinion the county, Kingsport, and Bristol have relied on it for far too long and have become complacent when it comes to economic development.

Table 5

CountyRankEstimated
Current
Property Value
Shelby1$122,116,400,578
Davidson2$105,301,418,705
Williamson3$55,812,256,667
Knox4$45,660,993,815
Hamilton5$44,738,981,752
Rutherford6$32,255,317,944
Sumner7$24,112,350,451
Sevier8$21,230,869,507
Sullivan9$18,976,725,006
Montgomery10$16,958,166,077
Blount11$16,469,522,914
Washington12$15,481,178,675
Bradley14$14,101,364,762
Wilson13$14,101,364,762
Madison15$11,024,153,912
Maury16$9,291,004,712
Anderson17$8,804,923,113
Putnam18$7,450,597,543
Hamblen19$7,328,642,509
Coffee20$5,428,259,549
Table 6

CountyRankProperty Value Per Person
Williamson1$325,527
Sevier2$250,260
Davidson3$168,174
Sumner4$155,089
Bradley5$146,170
Blount6$135,539
Shelby7$134,663
Hamilton8$134,412
Washington9$130,489
Rutherford10$129,399
Wilson11$128,424
Sullivan12$123,305
Anderson13$118,714
Hamblen14$117,952
Madison15$114,386
Maury16$113,390
Montgomery17$109,580
Knox18$106,183
Putnam19$104,702
Coffee20$104,121

Sullivan County in Table 7 has the worst rank of the top 2 retail sales counties for population growth.  Over an eight year period from years 2000 to 2008, Sullivan County only gained 850 in population.

Sullivan County death rate is higher than the birth rate and the county gained only 850 in population in the time span of 2000 to 2008.  The gain has come from new arrivals to the area.

Sullivan County is considered one of the larger populated counties in Tennessee.  In 1994, Sullivan County was the fifth most populated county.  Because of the growth in other counties and the declining population in Sullivan County, the rank of Sullivan County is estimated to be 11 in year 2030

Table 7

CountyRankPopulation % Change, 2000 to 2008
Rutherford139.94%
Williamson236.94%
Wilson323.64%
Sevier419.20%
Sumner519.18%
Maury617.90%
Montgomery714.83%
Blount814.82%
Putnam914.20%
Knox1012.56%
Washington1110.67%
Davidson129.87%
Bradley139.67%
Coffee148.58%
Hamilton158.10%
Hamblen166.89%
Madison174.94%
Anderson183.98%
Shelby191.04%
Sullivan200.56%
Table 8

CountyLand Area Sq MilesRankPersons Per Sq Mile
Davidson50211247
Shelby75521201
Knox5083846
Hamilton5424614
Rutherford6195403
Hamblen1616386
Sullivan4137373
Washington3268364
Williamson5839294
Sumner52910294
Bradley32911293
Montgomery53912287
Anderson33813219
Blount55914217
Wilson57115192
Putnam40116177
Madison55717173
Sevier59218143
Maury61319134
Coffee42920122

All data used in the above tables are from the links highlighted above in blue.

Household Median Income for Tennessee Counties

July 30th, 2009 No comments

Below is the household median income for the top 20 Tennessee Counties that had the largest retail sales.  The household median income is for the county and may be different for cities within the county.  Below is the household median Income for Sullivan County cities

Kingsport  $34,391  – Individuals below poverty level 18.0%

Bristol  $36,454 – Individuals below poverty level 14.6%

Sullivan County – Individuals below poverty level 15.8%


CountyRankHousehold Median Income
Williamson1$84,205
Wilson2$60,503
Sumner3$52,970
Rutherford4$50,623
Montgomery5$49,248
Blount6$46,009
Knox7$45,309
Maury8$44,990
Davidson9$44,486
Hamilton10$44,384
Shelby11$43,512
Anderson12$41,346
Bradley13$39,761
Madison14$39,721
Sevier15$39,534
Washington16$39,238
Hamblen17$37,661
Sullivan18$37,559
Coffee19$37,076
Putnam20$34,923

 

Below is the household income distribution for Kingsport and the household median income for Kingsport is $34,391.  In the graph below there are 2,636 people who are living in poverty.

 

The 2009 Poverty Guidelines for the 48 Contiguous States and the District of Columbia

Persons in familyPoverty guideline
1$10,830
2$14,570
3$18,310
4$22,050
5$25,790
6$29,530
7$33,270
8$37,010

For families with more than 8 persons, add $3,740 for each additional person.

 

Young adults continue to leave Sullivan County, TN

July 29th, 2009 No comments

I would be embarrassed to be a current or past elected leader or those having been responsible for economic development in Sullivan County, Kingsport, and Bristol Tennessee.  The ongoing problem of several decades with the young adults leaving the area and the fact that Sullivan County and its cities have an older population has not been addressed to stop the pattern of a declining population.

I am sure that our elected leaders would not want to publicly discuss this subject, but this blog will continue to make the public aware of the situation.  In my opinion, having a company like Eastman Chemical and the Bristol Nascar Race is good for the area, but having them has made the area complacent and the leaders have not done enough to get other good paying jobs here.

There may be some who may be wondering why approach this subject because of the negative impact it may have on future people moving to the area.  My answer is that there are about two decades of not addressing this problem with results.  Enough is enough!!  Let’s get it out front and center so the citizens/leaders can understand the problems and find solutions.

The graph below is from the State of Tennessee and gives a comparison for Sullivan County against Tennessee.  The time span for the graph is from 1990 to 2000 and shows that Sullivan did lag behind in the number of young people residing in the county.  Note in the graph that it appears that the age bracket 18-24 shows that our young folks are leaving the area and the age bracket 25-44 only had a 0.1% increase.  The 65 and over age bracket in Sullivan County did better than the state with a 19.1 percent increase.

The last line in the graph gives the county rank and Sullivan County did not fare well.  In the 18-24 age bracket, Sullivan County came in as having the worst rank of all 95 counties in the state.  The 65 and over age bracket gave Sullivan County a better rank of 28.

Population Growth Rate (1990 to 2000) was 6.6% which gave Sullivan County a rank of 90 out of 95 counties.  The growth rate for years 2000- 2008 is .56%

*A rank of 1 indicates the best condition.

Population Growth by Age Bracket, 1990 to 2000

Using more current data from the U.S. Census shows that Sullivan County and its cities have a low birth rate, young adults are still leaving the area, high median age and a high percentage of older adults age 65 and over.

The age distribution graph below on the left shows that Kingsport has a greater number of young adults leaving the area and has more older adults.

The graph on the right compares Tennessee, Florida, and Sullivan County.  Most folks have an impression that Florida has a lot of retirement-age people, but Sullivan County has a larger percentage of older adults.

Percent 65 Years and Over

  • Kingsport, Tennessee  20.1
  • Bristol, Tennessee  19.5
  • Sullivan County, Tennessee  17.8
  • Florida  17.4

Median Age

  • Bristol, Tennessee  43.2
  • Sullivan County, Tennessee  42.9
  • Kingsport, Tennessee  42.6
  • Florida  39.8

2005-2007 age distribution data from U. S. Census

The City of Kingsport uses a method of water meter turn on and off to keep track of its movement in the population.  This method is flawed since the young adults are more likely living with their parents and would not be picked up by the water meter method when they leave the area.

Sullivan County death rate is higher than the birth rate and the county gained only 850 in population in the time span of 2000 to 2008.  The gain has come from new arrivals to the area.

Sullivan County is considered one of the larger populated counties in Tennessee.  In 1994, Sullivan County was the fifth most populated county.  Because of the growth in other counties and the declining population in Sullivan County, the rank of Sullivan County is estimated to be 11 in year 2030.

Tennessee County Ranking Report for Population Growth

July 27th, 2009 No comments

County Population Estimates

Annual Estimates of the Resident Population for Counties: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2008

Tennessee Counties are ranked in the table below as percent growth in the highlighted column.  Sullivan County growth rate was .56 percent and gained 852 people over an eight year period.  Sullivan County rank was 75 and Shelby County rank was 72.

Data is from U.S. Census and you can see data for all states by going to the following link.

County Population Estimates

Geographic AreaPopulation Estimate 07/01/2008Change, 2000 to 2008Rank
NumberPercent
Rutherford County249,27067,24736.94%1
Williamson County171,45244,81435.39%2
Fayette County38,1739,36732.53%3
Wilson County109,80320,99423.64%4
Sequatchie County13,5802,21019.44%5
Robertson County64,89810,46519.23%6
Sevier County84,83513,66519.20%7
Sumner County155,47425,02519.18%8
Bedford County44,6967,11018.92%9
Loudon County46,4457,35918.83%10
Maury County81,93812,44017.90%11
Monroe County45,6486,68717.16%12
Jefferson County51,0746,78015.31%13
Montgomery County154,75619,98814.83%14
Blount County121,51115,68814.82%15
Cumberland County53,5906,78814.50%16
Tipton County58,7067,43514.50%17
Putnam County71,1608,84514.20%18
Knox County430,01947,98712.56%19
Marshall County29,7312,96411.07%20
Dickson County47,8844,72810.96%21
Washington County118,63911,44110.67%22
Grainger County22,7082,0499.92%23
Davidson County626,14456,2539.87%24
Cheatham County39,3963,4849.70%25
Bradley County96,4728,5079.67%26
Tennessee6,214,888525,6059.24%
White County25,1292,0278.77%27
Coffee County52,1344,1208.58%28
Rhea County30,7812,3818.38%29
Hamilton County332,84824,9528.10%30
Moore County6,1954557.93%31
Smith County19,1071,3957.88%32
Trousdale County7,8225637.76%33
Cannon County13,8049787.63%34
Hawkins County57,4773,9147.31%35
DeKalb County18,6941,2717.30%36
McMinn County52,5113,4967.13%37
Macon County21,8381,4527.12%38
Hickman County23,8411,5466.93%39
Stewart County13,2268566.92%40
Hamblen County62,1324,0046.89%41
Union County19,0081,2006.74%42
Meigs County11,7907046.35%43
Cocke County35,6882,1236.33%44
Fentress County17,6671,0426.27%45
Bledsoe County13,1427756.27%46
Lincoln County33,1161,7765.67%47
Henderson County26,9161,3945.46%48
Greene County66,1573,2485.16%49
Claiborne County31,4611,5995.34%50
Chester County16,3097694.95%51
Madison County96,3764,5394.94%52
Carter County59,4922,7504.85%53
Franklin County41,1651,8954.83%54
Scott County22,0399124.32%55
McNairy County25,7241,0714.34%56
Overton County20,9758574.26%57
Warren County39,8421,5664.09%58
Anderson County74,1692,8393.98%59
Johnson County18,1126133.50%60
Morgan County20,4046473.27%61
Roane County53,4301,5202.93%62
Campbell County40,9361,0822.72%63
Lawrence County40,9541,0282.57%64
Hardin County26,2276492.54%65
Gibson County49,2571,1052.29%66
Henry County31,7706552.11%67
Lewis County11,5641971.73%68
Marion County28,2474711.70%69
Perry County7,7531221.60%70
Humphreys County18,1492201.23%71
Shelby County906,8259,3531.04%72
Dyer County37,6003210.86%73
Houston County8,137490.61%74
Sullivan County153,9008520.56%75
Unicoi County17,718510.29%76
Van Buren County5,481-27-0.49%77
Grundy County14,220-112-0.78%78
Giles County29,184-263-0.89%79
Hardeman County27,848-257-0.91%80
Jackson County10,847-137-1.25%81
Hancock County6,693-93-1.37%82
Wayne County16,614-228-1.35%83
Lauderdale County26,692-409-1.51%84
Benton County16,193-344-2.08%85
Clay County7,794-182-2.28%86
Crockett County14,186-346-2.38%87
Polk County15,671-379-2.36%88
Carroll County28,719-756-2.56%89
Pickett County4,801-144-2.91%90
Obion County31,375-1,075-3.31%91
Decatur County11,288-443-3.78%92
Haywood County19,024-773-3.90%93
Weakley County33,375-1,520-4.36%94
Lake County7,323-631-7.93%95

100 Fastest Growing Counties – Tennessee Has Three

July 27th, 2009 No comments

Tennessee has three counties that made it in the U.S.Census 100 Fastest Growing Counties.  You can see all 100 counties by clicking on the Excel link below.

Resident Population Estimates for the 100 Fastest Growing U.S. Counties with 10,000 or More Population in 2008: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2008(CO-EST2008-08)

Excel (30k) CSV (7k)

Table 8: Resident Population Estimates for the 100 Fastest Growing U.S. Counties with 10,000 or More Population in 2008: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2008

Rank

Geographic Area

Population Estimates

Change, 2000 to 2008

July 1, 2008

April 1, 2000 Estimates Base

Number

Percent

57

Rutherford County, TN

249,270

182,023

67,247

36.9

70

Williamson County, TN

171,452

126,641

44,811

35.4

87

Fayette County, TN

38,173

28,796

9,377

32.6

Median Age Continues to Rise in Sullivan County, TN

July 26th, 2009 No comments

The median age of the population in Sullivan County and its major cities has been rising.  This is a function of young adults leaving the area and the low birth rate.


TennesseeSullivan County
2008 U.S. Census Estimate37.242.9
2000 Census340
1990 Census3437

Below in the table are median ages for the nine largest Tennessee Counties, Tennessee and Florida.Median-Age.gif

Data in the graph from U.S.Census

CNBC’s Top States For Business 2009—And The Winner Is

July 24th, 2009 No comments

And The Winner Is….
Virginia reclaims the title of America’s Top State for Business this year, squeezing past last year’s Top State, Texas, by a nose—just four points. Texas  is still a business powerhouse—the Lone Star State still has the top Economy in the nation despite the falling price of oil, and its Transportation and Infrastructure remain second to none.  But Virginia, always a solid performer across the board, managed just enough improvement in the right areas—like Economy (7 vs. 17 last year)–to regain the title it won in 2007.

State Ranking Report Shows Where People Retire

July 24th, 2009 No comments

Below is data that show the percent of people that are age 65 and older for the states below.  I have included Sullivan County, Tennessee and its two largest cities (Kingsport and Bristol).  The percent of poverty for those 65 and older in Sullivan County, TN is 15 percent and the household median income is $28,070.

The percent below is the percent of the population for the locations below.  Do not assume that the top three high-lighted areas below in the table are a haven for retires.  For the three high-lighted areas, it more of a function of low birth rates and young adults leaving the area.  There will have another post with the details on on all ages for Sullivan County, TN.

United States — States GCT-T4-R. Percent of the Total Population Who Are 65 Years and Over (geographies ranked by estimate). Data Set: 2008 Population Estimates

Rank

Geographic area

Percent 65 Years and Over

Kingsport, Tennessee

20.1*

Bristol, Tennessee

19.5*

Sullivan County, Tennessee

17.8

1

Florida

17.4

2

West Virginia

15.7

3

Pennsylvania

15.3

4

Maine

15.1

5t

Hawaii

14.8

5t

Iowa

14.8

7

North Dakota

14.7

8

South Dakota

14.4

9

Arkansas

14.3

10

Montana

14.2

11

Rhode Island

14.1

12t

Delaware

13.9

12t

Vermont

13.9

14

Alabama

13.8

15t

Connecticut

13.7

15t

Ohio

13.7

17

Missouri

13.6

18t

Nebraska

13.5

18t

Oklahoma

13.5

20t

Massachusetts

13.4

20t

New York

13.4

22t

Arizona

13.3

22t

Kentucky

13.3

22t

New Jersey

13.3

22t

Oregon

13.3

22t

South Carolina

13.3

22t

Wisconsin

13.3

28

Tennessee

13.2

29t

Kansas

13.1

29t

New Mexico

13.1

31

Michigan

13

32

New Hampshire

12.9

33

Indiana

12.8

34

Mississippi

12.6

35

Minnesota

12.5

36

North Carolina

12.4

37

Wyoming

12.3

38t

Illinois

12.2

38t

Louisiana

12.2

40t

Maryland

12.1

40t

Virginia

12.1

42t

Idaho

12

42t

Washington

12

44

District of Columbia

11.9

45

Nevada

11.4

46

California

11.2

47

Colorado

10.3

48

Texas

10.2

49

Georgia

10.1

50

Utah

9

51

Alaska

7.3

* – 2007 Estimate

All data is from U.S. Census

East TN County needs young adults to populate county

July 22nd, 2009 No comments

In the table below are the top nine largest populated counties in Tennessee.

The table shows that the Sullivan County death rate is 1,228 more than the birth rate.  Sullivan County had a Total Population Change of 850 people over an eight year period (April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2008) whereas Washington County that adjoins Sullivan County had a net gain of 11,441.

The data below is from U.S. Census and you can download the data set for any state at the following link.  The data is in XLS spreadsheet format. County Population Estimates

If you want to see just the Tennessee County data, go to the link below.

http://www.census.gov/popest/counties/tables/CO-EST2008-04-47.xls

Table 4: Cumulative Estimates of the Components of Resident Population Change for Counties of Tennessee: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2008
Geographic AreaTotal Population Change1Natural IncreaseVital EventsNet Migration
BirthsDeathsTotalInternational2Domestic
Shelby County9,35355,307119,38264,075-41,66112,192-53,853
Davidson County56,25533,87875,78141,903-1,09219,295-20,387
Rutherford County67,24717,21227,53810,32650,9142,41348,501
Montgomery County19,98613,34520,8217,4767,052-6017,653
Knox County47,98711,77041,88830,11831,7883,11128,677
Williamson County44,8119,79916,1426,34335,4941,69333,801
Hamilton County24,9386,95533,51726,5624,8343,3591,475
Sumner County25,0256,41315,7619,34819,2251,18518,040
Washington County11,4411,41911,0969,67710,5997659,834
Sullivan County850-1,22813,66014,8882,7126612,051

Using the data set from the U.S. Census and sorting all Tennessee Counties on the Natural Increase column shows Sullivan County as having the largest decrease for Natural Increase in the state.  Shown below are the top ten Tennessee Counties that had the largest Natural Decrease. (more deaths than births)

Table 4: Cumulative Estimates of the Components of Resident Population Change for Counties of Tennessee: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2008
Geographic AreaTotal Population Change1Natural IncreaseVital EventsNet Migration
BirthsDeathsTotalInternational2Domestic
Sullivan County850-1,22813,66014,8882,7126612,051
Roane County1,520-6334,4655,0982,3531602,193
Henry County667-6213,0183,6391,426851,341
Carroll County-767-5672,8883,455-8939-128
Unicoi County51-5621,5002,062681-4685
Gibson County1,108-5125,1455,6571,8571471,710
Cumberland County6,789-5054,3214,8267,434667,368
Benton County-344-4641,3601,82420214188
Hardin County649-4022,3382,7401,167331,134
Carter County2,752-3965,0265,4223,3191473,172
1 Total population change includes a residual. This residual represents the change in population that cannot be attributed to any specific demographic component. See State and County Terms and Definitions at http://www.census.gov/popest/topics/terms/state
2 Net international migration includes the international migration of both native and foreign-born populations. Specifically, it includes: (a) the net international migration of the foreign born, (b) the net migration between the United States and Puerto
Note: The April 1, 2000 estimates base reflects changes to the Census 2000 population resulting from legal boundary updates, other geographic program changes, and Count Question Resolution actions. All geographic boundaries for the 2008 population estima
Suggested Citation:
Table 4: Cumulative Estimates of the Components of Resident Population Change for Counties of Tennessee: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2008 (CO-EST2008-04-47)
Source: Population Division, U.S. Census Bureau
Release Date: March 19, 2009

Update: Sullivan Commission Supports King College Med School

July 22nd, 2009 No comments

The comments of citizens in the Bristol Herald Courier link below might be of interest to you.  Some great comments concerning the King Medical School.


Sullivan County Commissioners voted on July 20, 2009 to support the King College proposed medical school.

There was one lone commissioner that voted against the resolution  to support the medical school.  Thank you Commissioner John McKamey for using good logic in your “no” vote.  It appears that the remaining commissioners are more concerned about money than they are about understanding the area’s problems.

Sullivan County’s resolution, approved in a 21-1 vote, also included no money for the project.

Commissioner John McKamey of Piney Flats cast the lone dissenting vote. He said the county has a shortage of doctors because it hasn’t done anything to keep the ones who graduate from programs like the Quillen College of Medicine at East Tennessee State University in Johnson City, Tenn., from leaving the area.

“Over half the people who graduate [from Quillen] leave the area,” McKamey said as he challenged one of the reasons for supporting the school. “The solution to this thing is to keep the doctors here.”

McKamey said if the county supports the medical school now, it would commit itself to paying $100 million in taxpayer money. He said the $50 million in local taxes and $50 million in state taxes would be too large a burden for the region’s residents to bear.

Read more via Sullivan Commission Supports King College Med School | TriCities.